It's been a few years since I've actually run a web site which uses
libapache-mod-perl or apache-perl. If there's anyone more interested than I
in maintaining these packages, I'd be glad to pass them on.
They're in pretty good shape; there's one mysterious apache-perl bug which
shouldn't be too h
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthias Urlichs writes:
>
>> Maybe it's time to force gcc-3.2 into testing..?
>
> No, it should go in after binutils gets into testing.
What has happened to Chris Chimelis? He seems to be missing since early
February, and the last 6 uploads of binut
> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Colin> Assuming you're <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you have
Colin> four open release-critical bugs, none of which have had any
Colin> response, and three of which have been open since October.
Nope, that's a screwup on my part. The bu
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 04:25:52PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 03:56:48PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > i don't really know where that gcc-3.2 is coming from. as you can see
> > curl doesn't depend on it explicitly.
>
> libcurl2 and libcurl2-dbg depend on libgcc1 on
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > depth, i cannot help all that much about it, and libvorbis is a valid
> > > candidate, but his install
> "Andrew" == Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> cadaver
Andrew> You get ten of these to the penny.
Actually, cadaver shouldn't be on that list. The current maintainer
is continuing to support it and doesn't want to give it up unless
someone else ports it to GnuTLS (I aske
"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> all the footnote says is that imake Does The Right Thing, which is why
> it is exempted.
See, now I read it as "imake doesn't quite do the right thing, really,
but it's imake, so we'll let it slide - fixing it everywhere is
officially deemed no
I demand that Michael Banck may or may not have written...
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 02:00:33PM -0700, Elladan wrote:
>> Couldn't this be done more easily just by having the debian packages be
>> multi-arch bundles where an executable for each platform is included?
> And that would solve/help wha
[ I host the xshipwars upstream mailing lists... ]
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:32:04AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:27:06AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:06:29AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, BugScan reporter wrote:
> > >
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 01:44, Martin Schulze wrote:
> With two Debian conferences ([1] [2]) taking place this year, I wonder
> which topics other developers would like to see covered by the talks
> and/or workshops held within.
Although it hasn't yet been announced, there's also the Debian Mini-Con
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 07:27:42PM -0400, Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> Overall I think it is wonderful to see support for read-only root being
> worked on.
>
> On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 15:41, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> >
> > (doing this with bind mounts)
> >
> > >2.2 kernels are
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > Package: libcurl2
> > Architecture: arm
> > Version: 7.10.4-1
> > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.3-0pre6), ...
>
> Sorry for being a pain, but how are these dependencies assigned?
Through the shlibdeps system. Probably
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:11:17AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 10:56:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > lintian says:
> >
> > W: planets: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/planets
> > /usr/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib
> > N:
> > N: The binary or shared library defines the `RP
Anthony Towns wrote:
> You'll find it does on arm and probably one or two other architectures,
> but in particular:
>
> Package: libcurl2
> Architecture: arm
> Version: 7.10.4-1
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.3-0pre6), ...
Sorry for being a pain, but how are thes
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 02:00:33PM -0700, Elladan wrote:
> Couldn't this be done more easily just by having the debian packages be
> multi-arch bundles where an executable for each platform is included?
And that would solve/help what exactly? *I* don't have a s/390 at home
to produce such packages
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 09:22:45PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> And introduces the people who adopted the offending packages:
> Martin Butterweck ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Or not; I edited him out manually (pingus, which is orphaned and being
adopted very slowly) the first time around and forgot to
Matthias Urlichs writes:
> Maybe it's time to force gcc-3.2 into testing..?
No, it should go in after binutils gets into testing.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Yes, but it is better than having our packages hold back by libvorbis
> and the 105 or so packages that will be breaken by its inclusion in
> testing, many of them have big RC bugs and such, and will not be
> includable in testing for a
Couldn't this be done more easily just by having the debian packages be
multi-arch bundles where an executable for each platform is included?
Why is it necessary to pack them all into the same elf file and then
strip that later?
It's not really a good idea to modify the files produced by a binary
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 01:44:40PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > BTW, do you know if uploading a package to testing-update will be
> > considered by the testing scripts if the unstable version is a new
> > version and/or too buggy and such ? This would be a neat way to
> > rebui
Figures, there was a bug inherited from the original script that could
(semi-randomly) assign packages to the old maintainer if they were
adopted since potato. I have also filtered out packages which have
been removed from unstable but are still present in older suites. That
knocks the following pe
On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 20:08, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> If we're going to have /run/resolver, why not use /run/resolver/resolv.conf?
Fine with me. Any objections?
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There is a nice graphical front-end to Postgresql, in the non-US
section :
gk:~$ apt-cache show pgaccess| grep -A 100 Description
Description: Tk/Tcl interface to PostgreSQL
A Tk/Tcl program for X that provides a front-end to PostgreSQL. It can be
used to generate and store queries, views, repo
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
>> Andreas Tille wrote:
>> > > mpsql -- A graphical frontend for PostgreSQL [#89957]
>> > > * Orphaned 755 days ago
>> > It would be great if someone would step in here. Graphical frontends to
>> > PostgreS
Sven Luther wrote:
> BTW, do you know if uploading a package to testing-update will be
> considered by the testing scripts if the unstable version is a new
> version and/or too buggy and such ? This would be a neat way to
> rebuilding a testing package which is holding back huge amount of other
> p
Years ago, NeXT modified GCC and the rest of the GNU tools to allow
them to produce multi-architecture binaries, so that a single binary
executable could run on both 68k and i386 platforms. They also had a
tool that could strip out hunks for unwanted architectures.
Maybe that code has decayed, an
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > mpsql -- A graphical frontend for PostgreSQL [#89957]
> > > * Orphaned 755 days ago
> > It would be great if someone would step in here. Graphical frontends to
> > PostgreSQL are quite rare.
>
> It's non-free. However, Eri
On Monday 14 April 2003 02:36 am, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Proposal: Implementation steps for dynamic resolver configuration
[snip]
> * New "resolver" package includes /etc/init.d/resolver which
> generates /run/resolv.conf from /run/resolver/interface/*
> and does a run-parts on /etc/resolver/up
Hi,
Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> (2) do people really update their records? (For example, what
> percentage of entries were updated last year? What percentage of
> entries have not been updated at all for two years? three years?)
Well, personal information is not that often updated when it does
Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've volunteered to help build a database of KDE advocates and am
> starting the design. A previous kde-promo thread mentioned the
> Debian LDAP gateway as a possible model to follow.
> I would be interested in any feedback the Debian developers hav
There's a problem somewhere in postgresql-dump which is called by the
post-installation script, but I can't find it. I would welcome help
from anyone who can take a look and find where the bug is.
Problem: under some circumstances, /etc/postgresql/pg_hba.conf is
overwritten by a one line file rea
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 09:45:29AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> I'd like to see a place where the status of all the various places where
> potential Sarge release issues are tracked. I feel that
> http://www.debian.org/devel/testing was missing things, and I didn't see
> anything else like th
Hi,
> I'll go and check why
> dpkg-shlibdeps (what else??) thinks so.
Well, it doesn't. Not on i386 and ppc, anyway. As aj wrote, though,
apparently it does on arm. :-/
--
Matthias Urlichs|noris network AG|http://smurf.noris.de/
--
"We learn from history that we learn nothin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is there any kind of Hardware Compatibility List for Debian(Woody)?
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 04:19:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Boot a Knoppix CD. If it detects and runs your hardware, it is supported.
> If it doesn't, it isn't.
[...]
> Wasn't there a hardwar
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 04:20:45PM +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
> On Monday 14 April 2003 09:44, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > This is a sorted (worst offenders first) list of maintainers who have
> > excessive numbers of old RC bugs open against their packages. Bugs
> ...
> > Josef Spillner
>
> Your
With two Debian conferences ([1] [2]) taking place this year, I wonder
which topics other developers would like to see covered by the talks
and/or workshops held within.
For the Debian day [1] I'm maintaining a list anyway, so I would be
glad to be flooded with ideas to add and for which we could
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After re-reading my message, I would like to apologize for having been
> unnecessarily rude, being already tense for other reasons.
Apology accepted.
> I don't want to handle libnet-perl, but I can try to provide a patch
> for that specific issue if
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 03:56:48PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> i don't really know where that gcc-3.2 is coming from. as you can see
> curl doesn't depend on it explicitly.
libcurl2 and libcurl2-dbg depend on libgcc1 on arm. libgcc1 supplies
certain parts of the C runtime. There isn't really
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:17:33PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Duh. You're right. I admit to not being able to think of any other good
> (i.e. not-a-bug) reason why this dependency should be there, then. Since
> one of my packages has the same problem, I'll go and check why
> dpkg-shlibdeps
Hi,
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> $ ldd `which curl`
> [ no libgcc or similar ]
Duh. You're right. I admit to not being able to think of any other good
(i.e. not-a-bug) reason why this dependency should be there, then. Since
one of my packages has the same problem, I'll go and check why
dpkg-shli
Hi,
attached is a small patch that allows apt-check-sigs to also check
absolute dists (i.e. ending in a '/') like:
deb http://people.debian.org/~foo/woody-backports bar/
(in case http://people.debian.org/~foo/woody-backports/bar/ contains a
signed release file with the md5sum of the Packages file
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:42:07 +, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-11 14:34]:
>> Whatever happened to the idea of using a common database access library
>> like iODBC? It's reasonably small, Not A Burden if you happen to not
>> require any database look
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 03:56:48PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> i don't really know where that gcc-3.2 is coming from. as you can see
> curl doesn't depend on it explicitly.
> anyway debian has migrated to gcc 3.2 as default compiler and i build
> curl with gcc 3.2 since a couple of releases
$ ldd `which curl`
libcurl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcurl.so.2 (0x27ae1000)
libssl.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x27b06000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x27b35000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x27c25000)
libz.s
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 13:56:48 +, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> i don't really know where that gcc-3.2 is coming from. as you can see curl
> doesn't depend on it explicitly.
>
If it is built with gcc-3.2 and it needs a symbol from libgcc-3.2, then
the resulting package will depend on gcc-3.2.
I'd like to see a place where the status of all the various places where
potential Sarge release issues are tracked. I feel that
http://www.debian.org/devel/testing was missing things, and I didn't see
anything else like this. Following the debian-devel convention, I created
something myself.
I ma
I've volunteered to help build a database of KDE advocates and am
starting the design. A previous kde-promo thread mentioned the
Debian LDAP gateway as a possible model to follow.
I would be interested in any feedback the Debian developers have on
this system. It seems to have a lot of nice f
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 03:56:48PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> i don't really know where that gcc-3.2 is coming from. as you can see
> curl doesn't depend on it explicitly.
You'll find it does on arm and probably one or two other architectures,
but in particular:
Package: libcurl2
A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Debian Devs,
>
> Is there any kind of Hardware Compatibility List for Debian(Woody)?
Boot a Knoppix CD. If it detects and runs your hardware, it is supported.
If it doesn't, it isn't.
> I know there is the Hardware-Howto but this document is (too) old.
orphaned,
On Monday 14 April 2003 14:13, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Please, kick out all those questions. They have nothing to do here and
> should be replaced by either configuration files or autodetection. There
> have been 4 bug reports for more than 6 months asking for this and you
> haven't even replied
On Monday 14 April 2003 09:44, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> This is a sorted (worst offenders first) list of maintainers who have
> excessive numbers of old RC bugs open against their packages. Bugs
...
> Josef Spillner
Your script is buggy, fix it :-)
Are sponsored NMUs allowed in case of RC bugs ri
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I'd like to congratulate Michael Alan Dorman for the most stupid and
> annoying use of debconf. The bunch of questions asked on the libnet-perl
> installation are just annoying people installing it for what it is : a
> dependency f
Andreas Tille wrote:
> > mpsql -- A graphical frontend for PostgreSQL [#89957]
> > * Orphaned 755 days ago
> It would be great if someone would step in here. Graphical frontends to
> PostgreSQL are quite rare.
It's non-free. However, Erik Tews fixed the package so it has proper
build dependenc
Michael Alan Dorman a écrit :
> Josselin,
>
> As I have publically stated before, I will happily give up this
> package to someone who is obviously motivated to improve it
>
> Are you that person?
After re-reading my message, I would like to apologize for having been
unnecessarily rude, being a
hi,
i don't really know where that gcc-3.2 is coming from. as you can see
curl doesn't depend on it explicitly.
anyway debian has migrated to gcc 3.2 as default compiler and i build
curl with gcc 3.2 since a couple of releases ago. maybe it is required
someway. i'm CC debian-devel@, maybe some ki
On Monday 14 April 2003 14:30, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Maybe it should be recalled to everyone that debconf is not a place for
> asking users a bunch of stupid crap (how many % of our users know what
> is SNMP ?), but a place to configure the few things that cannot be
> autodected. Thank you.
I
Is there some equivalent to defoma for other distributions?
How would you describe the defoma data that applications read? Is it just
font configuration files or is there more?
I want to setup appropriate SE Linux policy for applications which defoma
files and want to not have it Debian specif
Josselin,
As I have publically stated before, I will happily give up this
package to someone who is obviously motivated to improve it
Are you that person?
Mike
En réponse à Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe it should be recalled to everyone that debconf is not a place
> for
> asking users a bunch of stupid crap (how many % of our users know what
> is SNMP ?), but a place to configure the few things that cannot be
> autodected. Thank you.
And
I'd like to congratulate Michael Alan Dorman for the most stupid and
annoying use of debconf. The bunch of questions asked on the libnet-perl
installation are just annoying people installing it for what it is : a
dependency for packages needing networking functionality for perl.
Please, kick out a
Sigh...
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 04:26:33AM -0700, Denton, Robert wrote:
> I don't know what happened, but I am not happy. Your shit is showing up as
> the homepage of Rimfirecentral.com. Whatever caused this needs to be
> resolved.
Well, I can't reach that server at all, but if you mean somethi
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Steve Kemp wrote:
> Mail me offlist if you'd like me to start hosting this package, etc.
I just keep this on list just to announce that some more images are available
now in version 0.2 of wallpapers-at package at
http://people.debian.org/~tille/debian-background/
I won
I don't know what happened, but I am not happy. Your shit is showing up as
the homepage of Rimfirecentral.com. Whatever caused this needs to be
resolved.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mangband
Version : 0.7.2a
Upstream Author : Robert Seifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.mangband.org/
* License : see the file COPYING in the source tarball:
non-free as in for non-com
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 03:14:21AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> The DD who updated the 3.0 version into unstable should work to make
> sure it enters testing. Until it does they should not upload a less
> stable version. They should drive the process and not let the process
> drive them.
but often
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:21:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > If you don't understand why you are on this list, use the "maintainer
> > address" query on http://bugs.debian.org/ and look for old RC bugs. If
> > you still don't understand, mail m
Proposal: Implementation steps for dynamic resolver configuration
Assuming that it is impossible to update networking daemons and
DNS caches simultaneously with providing the infrastructure for
dynamic resolver configuration, we need a plan for doing it in
stages.
Each of the following steps shou
>> On Sun, 13 Apr 2003 22:34:39 +0300,
>> Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm now getting a redefinition error and couldn't easily figure it
> out:
> In file included from conf_analysis_yy.h:5,
> from conf_analysis.yy:7:
> /usr/include/FlexLexer.h:112: r
Bjorn Stenberg wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Just minor searching through the archive turned these up with relevent
> > discussion.
>
> These posts, as your reply in debian-testing, concern packages that are not
> Valid Candidates.
But they did concern how testing operates. Insight into the de
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> If you don't understand why you are on this list, use the "maintainer
> address" query on http://bugs.debian.org/ and look for old RC bugs. If
> you still don't understand, mail me and I'll tell you.
You just should add the "maintainer address" to this
* Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-11 14:34]:
> Personally, I do not like all those -mysql, -pgsql, -whatever packages.
>
> Whatever happened to the idea of using a common database access library
> like iODBC? It's reasonably small, Not A Burden if you happen to not
> require any data
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 09:43:28AM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Just minor searching through the archive turned these up with relevent
> > discussion.
>
> These posts, as your reply in debian-testing, concern packages that are not
> Valid Candidates.
>
> My question conce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 02:34:32PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:57:34PM +0200, Lars Bahner wrote:
>> > pptp-linux
[...]
> Additionally, pptp-linux seems to be the only/prefe
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Just minor searching through the archive turned these up with relevent
> discussion.
These posts, as your reply in debian-testing, concern packages that are not
Valid Candidates.
My question concerns perfectly working packages that are suitable for testing,
yet are never cons
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 07:55:36AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 00:39, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 11:11:27PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > * Colin Walters
> > >
> > > | Anthony Towns has mentioned a few times that he thinks sarge will
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 07:38:00AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> (Personally, I'd vote against a proposal to make it mandatory. We have more
> than enough release-critical issues at the moment - cleaning up
> documentation to conform completely to W3C standards and recommendations is
> probab
On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 00:39, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 11:11:27PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Colin Walters
> >
> > | Anthony Towns has mentioned a few times that he thinks sarge will use
> > | Linux 2.6, which comes with most of the goodies like preemption already
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-14
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bacula
Version : 1.29
Upstream Author : Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.bacula.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Network backup system with mul
* David Nusinow
| On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 11:11:27PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > * Colin Walters
| >
| > | Anthony Towns has mentioned a few times that he thinks sarge will use
| > | Linux 2.6, which comes with most of the goodies like preemption already
| > | included. We'll probably ju
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> with the packages I have uploaded to http://www.arndb.de/debian/.
[...]
> There is a lot that can be done before the hardware is available,
> so if there is enough interest, we should start a coordinated
> effort soon.
yes, please submit bug reports to glibc, binutils and g
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 19:44:35 -0500, Thomas Bliesener wrote:
> Do you consider the recommendations of the W3 Consortium as binding or
> optional for the Debian project?
I'd say having our documentation conform to W3C standards and
recommendations is desirable, but not a binding requirement. If
81 matches
Mail list logo
