$BpJs<<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B#T(B/045-474-5237$B!!#F(B/045-475-0764
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bhttp://www.yap.co.jp
(B
(B
(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B2#IM%"%I!&%W%m%b!<%7%g%s6(F1AH9g!J([EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
$B?75,;v6H;2F~$r$*9M$($N4k6HMM$X!Z?M:`%S%8%M%9$N5/6H!A1?1D![(B
$B$rA4LLE*$K$*e#1
>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> From the changelog of Debian policy package:
>>
>> debian-policy (3.5.7.0) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>> [...]
>> * we no longer have task packages, instead, we define tasks using a
>> special field in the control file (and these shou
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 06:19, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > In a chrooted environment, we can install deboostrap and
> > package dependencies through APT.
>
> About 6 months ago I started writing some code in expect to do just this, to
> test my qu
> "Andrew" == Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> Recommends and Suggests are not considered when installing
Andrew> build-dependencies.
And packages aren't supposed to be built staticly either. Packages
that do build staticly could explicitly Build-Depend on whatever
Clint Adams wrote:
> alias ren='noglob zmv -W'
> ren *.c *.x
Ok, I love zsh and all, but: RUN AWAY!!
> I find the last preferable to the more cumbersome syntaxes of rename and
> mmv.
rename 's/\.c$/.x/' cumbersome?
--
see shy jo, suffering 4dos flashbacks (see my .zshrc)
pgpl43ZOy1ZMN.pgp
De
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hmm. According to the latest policy the Task: method should be used
> which I think is not the best thing...
>
> From the changelog of Debian policy package:
>
> debian-policy (3.5.7.0) unstable; urgency=low
>
> [...]
> * we no longer have task packages, instead, we
On Tue, 03 Sep 2002, Stephen Zander wrote:
> I wrote a longer response to this but then thought about what you
> wrote a bit more and deleted it.
>
> > "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Henrique> The lack of symbol versioning, about 90% of the time.
>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:34:23PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I deleted /var/cache/* today to free up some space on my /var
> partition. However, instead of applications re-creating the files as I
> expected, I recieved a bunch of error messages.
> apt/apt-get refused to do anything until I ma
Duncan Findlay wrote:
> True, the FHS does not specifically say that directories have to be
> recreated, but I would consider it a bug if they aren't. Anyone agree?
I think it would be at best a feature request, but I would like to see
that feature implemented, nontheless..
--
see shy jo
pgpDT
I deleted /var/cache/* today to free up some space on my /var
partition. However, instead of applications re-creating the files as I
expected, I recieved a bunch of error messages.
apt/apt-get refused to do anything until I manually created the
directory /var/cache/apt/archives/partial
I also got
On Sep 03, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> some weeks ago I was installing an HP OfficeJet and on the hpoj mailing list
> somebody was pointing out that I need the latest version of foomatic to get
> good results.but it seems that the Debian foomatic-{bin,db} packages in
> sid are outdated. I contact
I wrote a longer response to this but then thought about what you
wrote a bit more and deleted it.
> "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Henrique> The lack of symbol versioning, about 90% of the time.
Then why not mandate symbol versioning instead; that
On Tue, 03 Sep 2002, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What is the thinking behind always requiring libfoo-dev to depend on
> > libbar-dev when libfoo depends on libbar? I understand the need when
The lack of symbol versioning, about 90% of the time.
> > bu
Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 09:50]:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >> What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable.
> >> How to do this? They should be rather be tagged t
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:13:07PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > A NMU is a waste of effort if the same thing can be done by the maintainer
> > after just one quick email message -- primarily a waste of effort for the
> > NMUer who
i'm not 100% certain that it's related but for the last week or so, i've
been unable to run apt-get update on any of my home machines. what i
get is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [09:01:52] ~# apt-get update
Get:1 http://siva.taz.net.au unstable/main Packages [2097kB]
Get:2 http://siva.taz.net.au unstable/m
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 18:13, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> And lastly, am I the only one who finds complaining about *other
> people* wasting effort to be insane in a volunteer-based organisation?
> There's a difference between advice, and telling people what to spend
> their time on.
Am I the only
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:57:33PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ray" == J H M Dassen writes:
> Ray> How opaque is that opaque when considering the case of
> Ray> linking against a library statically?
>
> That need might reasonably be met with a Recommends: or Suggests:
Recommend
Hi Joey,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > Thanks. Then is everyone ok if I include (or submit bug against the
> > packages that
> > don't) Task: spanish to the control files for
>
> No, that's not how it works. File a bug against tasksel if you are not
> seeing the sp
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gjay
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Chuck Groom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gjay.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : an automatic and learning DJ for xmms
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rrdcollect
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Dawid Kuroczko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rrdcollect.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : RRDcollect - Round-Rob
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> A NMU is a waste of effort if the same thing can be done by the maintainer
> after just one quick email message -- primarily a waste of effort for the
> NMUer who has to go in and figure out how to fix the package, not the
> maintainer.
And if you use zsh, you don't need to bother with mmv or rename, since
there's zmv.
> > Anyway, it's similar to the 'rename' command that someone else mentioned.
> > It renames multiple files like converting all the files in a directory
> > from upper to lower case
>
> mmv \* \#l1
zmv '(*)' '$
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:07:28PM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
> >
> > >> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > > tab and untab (I just discovered that this can be done with pr).
> > > If it can be done with something else it
> "Ray" == J H M Dassen writes:
Ray> How opaque is that opaque when considering the case of
Ray> linking against a library statically?
That need might reasonably be met with a Recommends: or Suggests:
--
Stephen
To Republicans, limited government means not assisting people they
wou
Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the thinking behind always requiring libfoo-dev to depend on
> libbar-dev when libfoo depends on libbar? I understand the need when
> /usr/include/foo.h contains
>
> #include
>
> but if libfoo opaquely wraps libbar, why have libfoo-dev dep
"J. Scott Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed Aug 28 11:37:29 2002 Allan Wind wrote:
> > On 2002-08-27 21:59:28, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
> > > file slicer (that can slice up a file into different size chunks).
> >
> > dd?
>
> Yea, that would do it, slightly more cumbersome to use.
spli
Martin Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
>
> > If you're not able to maintain
> > your packages properly and in a timely manner, and your holding up a
> > major part of the distribution, it's your fault.
>
> I'm interested in this.
> Individuals d
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:58:10 -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> but if libfoo opaquely wraps libbar, why have libfoo-dev depend on
> libbar-dev?
How opaque is that opaque when considering the case of linking against a
library statically?
Ray
--
"The problem with the global village is all the glo
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, I wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Romain Lerallut wrote:
> >
> > Thus spake J. Scott Edwards on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:59:28PM -0600:
> > > file renamer (that can change case).
> >
> > Just asking: anything that mmv can't do ?
> >
>
> (I guess that you meant 'mv'?)
>
I feel
Hello!
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:52:13PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:56:46PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
...
> > What I'm saying is that to must have a mail-server install, even if it is
> > just ssmtp or something like that.
>
> Yes,
Hello!
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:16:15AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 23:05, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>
> > That will also break rsyncing them, which saves a lot.
>
> Let's just keep pestering gzip upstream to include the rsyncable patch.
...
I want to second this, as th
Anthony Towns writes:
> Build time is important too: that's the only time you can attempt fine
> grained testing of modules rather than executables, and it lets you catch
> problems before you upload too. eg, after some irritating bugs that happened
> to only show up on one or two architectures,
Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> some weeks ago I was installing an HP OfficeJet and on the hpoj
> mailing list somebody was pointing out that I need the latest
> version of foomatic to get good results.but it seems that the
> Debian foomatic-{bin,db} packages in sid are o
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:02:20PM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Romain Lerallut wrote:
> > Thus spake J. Scott Edwards on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:59:28PM -0600:
> > > file renamer (that can change case).
> >
> > Just asking: anything that mmv can't do ?
>
> (I guess that yo
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 03:03:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Additionally I'm of half a mind to suggest that the maintainer have the
> ability to remove the files from the DELAYED system; their timing may be
> off, the person who put them there may be unavailable, etc.
I agree. Actually I was
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
> >> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > tab and untab (I just discovered that this can be done with pr).
> > If it can be done with something else it might not be too necessary. It
> > is your choice though.
>
> JFYI, it can als
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 Romain Lerallut wrote:
>
> Thus spake J. Scott Edwards on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:59:28PM -0600:
> > file renamer (that can change case).
>
> Just asking: anything that mmv can't do ?
>
(I guess that you meant 'mv'?)
Anyway, it's similar to the 'rename' command that someone e
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Le Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:01:33PM -0500, The Doctor What écrivait:
> > * Elie Rosenblum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020902 11:43]:
> > > DELAYED is fine. Not submitting a bug is not fine.
> >
> > Can DELAYED be set up to email the maintainer with the change
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> program called xplot. Consider using the alternatives system for that.
> You'll need to coordinate with the maintainer of the other xplot package
> for that to work.
That sounds ugly though - having an alternative for something that does
entirely different stuff. Isn't it
#include
* Peter Mathiasson [Tue, Sep 03 2002, 06:44:54PM]:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > NMUer time is better spent on really unmaintained packages.
>
> Amen.
Dito. Unused and maintained package are not bad, they will be excluded
if they have RC bugs. But fr
What is the thinking behind always requiring libfoo-dev to depend on
libbar-dev when libfoo depends on libbar? I understand the need when
/usr/include/foo.h contains
#include
but if libfoo opaquely wraps libbar, why have libfoo-dev depend on
libbar-dev?
--
Stephen
"Farcical aquatic ceremo
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 07:06:23PM -0700, Vikram wrote:
>
> If you are too busy for this I still offer to look into packaging tcptrace
> with xplot.
If you want to go ahead and package xplot, please do. You'll need to
handle the fact that we've already got an xplot package that installs a
progra
Le Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:01:33PM -0500, The Doctor What écrivait:
> * Elie Rosenblum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020902 11:43]:
> > DELAYED is fine. Not submitting a bug is not fine.
>
> Can DELAYED be set up to email the maintainer with the changelog?
>
> Would that help the "unexpected" NMU from amb
Le Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:12:58PM +1000, Mark Purcell écrivait:
> Bas,
Mark,
why do you need to complain about that in -devel ?
> It is actually courtesy to file a bug/ contact the maintainer prior to
> uploading a NMU (even to DELAYED/3-day). Have a look at Bug #159174 which I
> received two
On Wed Aug 28 11:37:29 2002 Allan Wind wrote:
>
> On 2002-08-27 21:59:28, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
> > tab and untab (I just discovered that this can be done with pr).
>
> tr
I'm not the brightest bulb in the box, so perhaps it's just me, but tr
seems kind of a complicated way to do this. I don'
* Elie Rosenblum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020902 11:43]:
> DELAYED is fine. Not submitting a bug is not fine.
Can DELAYED be set up to email the maintainer with the changelog?
Would that help the "unexpected" NMU from ambushing the maintainer?
Ciao!
--
When the only tool you have is a hammer, you
Le Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> I agree, filing bugs and direct mails are much better than -devel-announce
> posts, much less likely for one to skip by accident IMHO.
Can we file bugs to ask that a package needs to be recompiled and uploaded
in a staging area ?
T
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libsdl-console
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Boris Lesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Garrett Banuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sdlconsole.tuxfamily.org
* License
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:11:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
> error message?
The "error" message is:
BIOS data check successful
Interestingly the very same message is printed my my manually installed
2.4.18 kernel, but not by th
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> NMUer time is better spent on really unmaintained packages.
Amen.
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgpydQfe90SCO.pgp
Descri
Hello,
some weeks ago I was installing an HP OfficeJet and on the hpoj mailing list
somebody was pointing out that I need the latest version of foomatic to get
good results.but it seems that the Debian foomatic-{bin,db} packages in
sid are outdated. I contacted the maintainer, Manfred Wass
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:44, Svante Signell wrote:
> After upgrade of lilo in unstable my whole SCSI disk got trashed. It
> could only be recovered with the use of the IBM drive fitness test
> tool, and a complete erase disk was necessary :-( What happened?
If you need to run an IBM diagnostics progr
Henning Glawe wrote:
> the manpage of debconf.conf says it uses the topmost writable database
> in a stack for saving users choices. But debconf complains if the
> topmost database in a stack isn't writable.
This will be fixed in a future release.
--
see shy jo
pgpIV3RmBj44W.pgp
Description:
> Then the policy document is wrong? Shouldn't it be bugged?
I guess the policy document describes how this is to be done _now_.
(That is after woody ;)
Whereas the override file was they way this was handled for woody.
Maybe ask on debian-policy on this issue?
Greetings,
Erich
--
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Thanks. Then is everyone ok if I include (or submit bug against the packages
> that
> don't) Task: spanish to the control files for
No, that's not how it works. File a bug against tasksel if you are not
seeing the spanish task, which it already has.
Try ru
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 05:30:13PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Well, I have always held (right or wrong) pretty much the opposite
> view to yours: /var/www _is_ for Debian content, and local content
> belongs in /usr/local. (thats why you don't see all that much in my
> /var/www :-] )
IMO this
您好
本邮件属善意邮件,打扰之处,敬请见谅!!
如果得到您的支持，我们一定保证您的舱位，以方便您的贸易操作
上海至 九月一日执行
***
目的港 20' 40' 40HQ船东 船期
*
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 03:25:16PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Anyway, do you know when a fixed version of pbuilder will be available?
Never mind: I've just tried a "pbuilder create --distribution sid" and
it worked fine.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 09:55:06PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> You may upgrade your chroot from woody.
>
> pbuilder create --distribution woody
> pbuilder update --distribution sid
Tnx for the hint.
Anyway, do you know when a fixed version of pbuilder will be available?
I have to use pbuilder
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:30:43 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Extracting source
> unable to get login information for username "shaul" at
> /usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 56.
> Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/dpkg-source line 22.
> pbuilder: Failed extracting the source
> -> unmount
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:40:02 +1000
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't install the latest version of debootstrap (in case this
> is going to help), the whole idea of using pbuilder was so I don't
> have to upgrade libc6 to unstable on my host system.
You may upgrade your chroot from wo
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:58:57PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
> What I'm trying to say is, does it really matter? Why not just make a
> maintainer upload when you have time, be it before or after the NMU
> enters the pool.
> For you the NMU seems like a waste of time, but it was not a waste of
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:49:14PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> How about we start from the simple issue of notifying maintainers and making
> sure they are _aware_ of the exact problems? People can be reasonably alert
> for fixing their packages without knowing what's that's going on in the
> bigge
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:25:34PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
> And by the use of DELAYED it does not even need to be installed in the
> pool before you react. Why get so upset about a, what I can tell from
> this discussion, working NMU.
Having been in this position in the past I have to say
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:25:34PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
> Therefore the NMU. When you have finally understood the problem and
> solved it, either through incorporating the NMU or in your own way, you
> (the maintainer) can upload a new version.
How about we start from the simple issue of
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
> > to follow -devel-announce without accidently overlooking a post there or
> > two.
>
> Seeing the mail is one thing. Fully understanding it and grasping that
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Robert Jordens wrote:
> > Users complained they were not able to compile ardour because of these
> > libraries and C++'s ABI instability.
> > So Paul Davis (upstream) decided to include all C++ libraries except
> > libs
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
> > to follow -devel-announce without accidently overlooking a post there or
> > two.
>
> Seeing the mail is one thing. Fully understanding it and grasping that
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:11:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
> error message?
2.4.19-k7.
As for the BIOS message, I will look it up when I get to the machine the
next time. It may take a day or two though. Anyway, that message did
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
> to follow -devel-announce without accidently overlooking a post there or
> two.
Seeing the mail is one thing. Fully understanding it and grasping that
it af
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:43:25AM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> > > |
> > > | Excerpt from the changelog:
> > > | * we no longer have task packages, instead, we define tasks using a
> > > | special field in the control file (and t
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > I agree, filing bugs and direct mails are much better than -devel-announce
> > posts, much less likely for one to skip by accident IMHO.
>
> That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
> to follow -deve
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I agree, filing bugs and direct mails are much better than -devel-announce
> posts, much less likely for one to skip by accident IMHO.
That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs
to follow -devel-announce w
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:43:04PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
> > The strict minimum is :
> > - create a patch for the NMU
> > - make the patch available to the maintainer (via direct mail or bts)
>
> DELAYED is fine. Not submitting a bug is not fine.
>
> I think he would have been within the g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bas,
It is actually courtesy to file a bug/ contact the maintainer prior to
uploading a NMU (even to DELAYED/3-day). Have a look at Bug #159174 which I
received two hours after your NMU notification.
Mark
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 01:36, you wrote:
> Hi!
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> makes it boot but later I get a lost interrupt on hda. Now I installed
> 2.4.19 and do get that message about bios checksum or so. But after that
> it stands still again.
Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
error message?
Moin,
the manpage of debconf.conf says it uses the topmost writable database
in a stack for saving users choices. But debconf complains if the
topmost database in a stack isn't writable.
--
c u
henning
script started on Tue Sep 3 12:00:00 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# pbuilder build --distribution woody --basetgz \
> /var/cache/pbuilder/woody/base.tgz \
> ~shaul/devel/debian/libv/libv1.25/libv1.25_1.25-3.dsc
W: /root/.pbuilderrc does not exist
pbuilder-buildpackage/i386 $Id: pbuilder-buildpackage
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:07:59AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> >> kronstadt:~# dpkg --status debian-test
> >> Package: debian-test
>
> Wasn't this at least a start? Shouldn't we build on it instead of
> starting from scratch?
Using this framework could ease many of the problems testing
package
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:57:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> > The dpkg-iasearch package used to contain a program called dpkg-query.
> > When the dpkg maintainers added a program with the same name, the
> > dpkg-iasearch maintainer renamed his file, without worrying about
> > 'seniority'. I t
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:49:04AM +0200, Helios de Creisquer wrote:
> Package: wnpp
[...]
> * Package name: tetrinetx
[...]
I CC-ed [EMAIL PROTECTED], closing the RFP, I though it was
the right thing to do, but apparently I was misleading...
Thx to Daniel Burrows for reporting it, and sorry
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:43:25AM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> > |
> > | Excerpt from the changelog:
> > | * we no longer have task packages, instead, we define tasks using a
> > | special field in the control file (and these should be added only
> > | after discussion on the mailing l
* Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 09:50]:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable.
>> How to do this? They should be rather be tagged than be closed
>> by an upload to unstable. Not unco
Hello,
After upgrade of lilo in unstable my whole SCSI disk got trashed. It
could only be recovered with the use of the IBM drive fitness test
tool, and a complete erase disk was necessary :-( What happened?
A reinstall of Woody showed that it can only boot from the MBR
partition, not the root pa
Hi,
I've been using self compiled kernels throughout the years and up to
2.4.18 never experienced a problem. But Now I tried switching to the
debian kernel and cannot do that at all. When using 2.4.18 the first try
ends before "Uncompressing ..." is written on the screen. A reset then
makes it boo
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:38:52PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Still, the Packages files should only be removed after no software in
> our stable distribution depends on it. If you remove the Packages file
> from unstable now you will break apt-proxy (and perhaps other tools
> too).
Well, apt-
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 06:28:44PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 05:13:51PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >
> > Now we just have to solve the upload-to-security problem, or simply
> > write some other check that scans the security.d.o web pages and
> > make
88 matches
Mail list logo
