Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-27 Thread J. Scott Edwards
I guess I was worried that they are so trivial that any of the real programmers on this list could recreate them in 5 minutes with sed, awk, and perl. :) But, well ok: little endian hex dump find a file within a file duplicate file remover tab and untab (I just discovered that this can be done w

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Miles Bader
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What's especially cool is that it hardwires the British (or Australian, > > in this case, I guess) spelling of `disc' as part of the UI > > The idea that devfs hardwires anything seems to be very popular. It is > also completely wrong. You can use th

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like > 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :) On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the redirect and follow the spec

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your > packages such as: >

Re: can a non developper become a debian maintainer ?

2002-08-27 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:50, Rémi Letot wrote: > I have a simple question : can a non developper type become a debian > maintainer ? The reason is that I use debian on multiple servers and > workstations, and I'd like to contribute to the project. I'm > definitely not a developper, more a sysadmin. I

Re: Unreadable packages in dak queue

2002-08-27 Thread Philippe Troin
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:26:15PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote: > > Is there any reason why the packages in the dak queue (for example > > /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new on ftp-master) are 660 instead of 664 ? > > Yep. Export notification hasn't bee

Re: Unreadable packages in dak queue

2002-08-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:26:15PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote: > Is there any reason why the packages in the dak queue (for example > /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new on ftp-master) are 660 instead of 664 ? Yep. Export notification hasn't been sent for them, etc. That's the theory, at least. --

can a non developper become a debian maintainer ?

2002-08-27 Thread Rémi Letot
Hi all, I have a simple question : can a non developper type become a debian maintainer ? The reason is that I use debian on multiple servers and workstations, and I'd like to contribute to the project. I'm definitely not a developper, more a sysadmin. I know debian quite well. I can also compile,

Unreadable packages in dak queue

2002-08-27 Thread Philippe Troin
Is there any reason why the packages in the dak queue (for example /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new on ftp-master) are 660 instead of 664 ? Phil.

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Branden Robinson wrote: > Why, God, why? Well.. I wanted to get rid of those annoying priority override messages from dinstall. Of course I overdid it by making all vim packages priority extra: ftpmaster lists vim and vim-ruby as priority optional. I have no idea what made them dec

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

2002-08-27 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On August 27, 2002 at 2:28AM -0700, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LHa 0.01-1.00: Masaru Oki (LHa original author, 1991-1992) > Suse.com list e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] He is one of the NetBSD developers. His e-mail address is <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > LHa 1.10-1.14: Nob

Re: apt-get wants to upgrade package to same version?

2002-08-27 Thread Brian May
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:36:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > The pins are used to determine which of all the available versions for > the package are candidates for installation, in Ludovic's case both the > woody and unstable versions are candidates (both have pin > now). In my case, th

Bug#158548: ITP: ocamldsort -- A dependency sorter for OCaml source files

2002-08-27 Thread Dimitri Ara
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: ocamldsort Version : 0.12 Upstream Author : Dimitri Ara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://dimitri.mutu.net/files/ocamldsort-0.12.tar.gz License : GPL Description : A dependency sorter for OCaml source fil

Bug#158543: RFA: python-pgsql -- A Python DB-API 2.0 interface to PostgreSQL v7.x

2002-08-27 Thread Kevin Lindsay
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Probably being the most common reason, lack of time or commitment. I know people are still using this package, such me, so hopefully someone can adopt it that will keep it updated better than I can. --- Kevin Lindsay D

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 14:32, Joey Hess wrote: > Cause you need an exotic peice of hardware called a "teletype" or "CRT" > or "LCD" to use it, I suppose. Or maybe it's that "qwerty keyboard" > thing. Perhaps it's the "conflicts with something that is standard or higher" rule in action... although I

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: > >* Change priority to extra > > > > > > > > > > > > "CLEAR!" > > > > "AGAIN! CLEAR!" > > > > > > Why, God, why? Cause you need an exotic peice of hardware called a "teletype" or "CRT" or "LCD" to use it, I suppose. Or maybe it's that "qwerty ke

Re: PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Thorsten Sauter
Hello, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:56:38PM +0200, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > Hallo > > I need to use oracle with php4 on Debian? How can I do it? Could > somebody [help me] build php4-oracle package? > Thanks I have created a simple package based on the latest php4-packages from testing. This

Re: PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:46:02PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:16:19PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > > Furthermore i'm interested as to why there are two packages called > > libphp-adodb and libphp-phplot. Which seems to break with the php4- > > naming scheme that the m

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0400, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > vim (6.1.165-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Change priority to extra "CLEAR!" "AGAIN! CLEAR!" Why, God, why? -- G. Branden Robinson|I'm sorry if the following sounds Debian GNU/L

Bug#158507: ITP: statslog -- An IRC Channel Logger

2002-08-27 Thread Chris Mason
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-27 Severity: wishlist * Package name: statslog Version : 2.0.7 Upstream Author : Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.k-rad.org/bin * License : GPL Description : An IRC Channel Logger A utility to

Play a Hilarious Prank Call

2002-08-27 Thread UK PRANK CALLS
To Play a Hilarious Prank on your mates please visit http://ukprankcalls.com

Re: PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:16:19PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 11:56, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > > Hallo > > > > I need to use oracle with php4 on Debian? How can I do it? Could > > somebody [help me] build php4-oracle package? > > Thanks > Can you not use ODBC and the li

Re: testing script

2002-08-27 Thread Bdale Garbee
aj@azure.humbug.org.au (Anthony Towns) writes: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:40:09PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > I was just told the script updating testing doesn't run at the moment. > > Is that true? If so, is there a reason? Are we already in freeze? :-) > > It's running, but it's not doin

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Joey Hess
Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). This is very nice. A few comments: - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. - On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only s

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-27 Thread Oliver Elphick
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 17:11, J. Scott Edwards wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a compiler (based upon SmallEiffel) and a bunch of dumb little > utilites that I have been planning to make .deb files for. But I don't > know if they have enough general appeal to make them official, or if I > should jus

Re: PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Rob Bradford
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 11:56, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > Hallo > > I need to use oracle with php4 on Debian? How can I do it? Could > somebody [help me] build php4-oracle package? > Thanks > Can you not use ODBC and the libphp-adodb package? Furthermore i'm interested as to why there are two p

Dumb little utilities

2002-08-27 Thread J. Scott Edwards
Hello, I have a compiler (based upon SmallEiffel) and a bunch of dumb little utilites that I have been planning to make .deb files for. But I don't know if they have enough general appeal to make them official, or if I should just make them and put them on my SourceForge project pages. Does any

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel: > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick you can see there is 1 bug for the file package. But in fact there's d

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > > Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug > > Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp > > metacharacter escaping needed somewhere. > > Yes, very similar problem for kimwi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: Hi, > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. It is now fixed. As Colin s

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 27.08.02 um 15:03:31 schrieb Colin Watson: > > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. > > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. > Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in t

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Indra Kusuma
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: # Hola amigos, # # # Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages # properly. So here are packages up for adoption : # # coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, # libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Aurélien Beaujean
Le mardi 27 août 2002 à 22:50, Chanop Silpa-Anan écrivait: > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, > muttprint, type1inst, freefont, and sharefont. As Rene took muttprint, i took latex2html and i will also upl

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:10:26PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs with > build failure in the buildd link, > but it probably needs more work on the buildd page side? Last year (!) I write a patch for the buildd log page and s

Re: OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:18:43PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Using objdump -T to look at it, > ldap_pvt_tls_get_peer and other things that are ldap_*_tls_* > seems to be defined only on the TLS version, and not on the > other version. pvt -> private. I don't think a user application is all

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Igor Genibel wrote: > Hi all, > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your > packages such as: > - the

RE: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread STOJICEVIC Edi EXPSIA
> Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages > properly. So here are packages up for adoption : > > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, > muttprint, type1inst, freefont, and sha

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this? Surely not ! ;) > Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 > in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 > > Warning: Compilation failed: noth

Re: testing script

2002-08-27 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:40:09PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > I was just told the script updating testing doesn't run at the moment. > Is that true? If so, is there a reason? Are we already in freeze? :-) It's running, but it's not doing any good. There's a new version of glibc in unstable tha

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > Igor Genibel writes: > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:11:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I > wasn't watching. Thanks! Thanks a lot to. > I notice one slight glitch; following a PTS link to a lib* package takes > you to e.g. http://pts.debian.net/l/libfilte

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi all, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: > Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages > properly. So here are packages up for adoption : > > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, > muttp

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Igor, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons for each of

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > > Igor Genibel writes: > > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having versio

Re: OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:18:43PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:42:27 +0200 > Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - There is libldap2-tls with TLS built in which can be installed on top > > of libldap2. It diverts the libraries without TLS and replaces them

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > Igor Genibel writes: > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Il mar, 2002-08-27 alle 14:50, Chanop Silpa-Anan ha scritto: > Hola amigos, > > > Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages > properly. So here are packages up for adoption : > > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-

Re: apt-get wants to upgrade package to same version?

2002-08-27 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 06:21, Brian May wrote: > I suspect this is a more general problem with apt-get that it assumes > that if two versions of the same package are available from different > sources, then both packages will be exactly the same. As such, it will > always use the Packages entry fro

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Decklin Foster
Igor Genibel writes: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. Other

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I wasn't watching. Thanks! I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this? Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 ... Loo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:24:57 +0200 Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); > - the broken dependencies for each branch (stable, testing, unstable). This is simply, great. Good work! It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any l

Re: Bug#158459: How to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your debian/rules

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:36:09 -0400 "Carlos O'Donell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > > > Even better, something like > > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever. > > > It's generally not desirable to in

Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Hola amigos, Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages properly. So here are packages up for adoption : coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, muttprint, type1inst, freefont, and

Re: Bug#158459: How to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your debian/rules

2002-08-27 Thread Carlos O'Donell
> > > It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > > Even better, something like > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever. > > It's generally not desirable to introduce null path components into > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH if it was unset before, see #152099

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Dennis Schoen
Hi Igor, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > > I waiting for you comments, advices, insults or other things. Many thanks for you

[ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
Hi all, I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your packages such as: - the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to Raphaël

How to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your debian/rules

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On 27 Aug 2002 13:03:15 +0100 Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > > Even better, something like > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever. > > It's generally not desirable to introduce null path

Re: OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:42:27 +0200 Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - There is libldap2-tls with TLS built in which can be installed on top > of libldap2. It diverts the libraries without TLS and replaces them > with the TLS supporting libs > > Most of this work was done by Rol

Re: New package netfilter-init to experimental?

2002-08-27 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:47:41 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes: >Well, have a look on ipmasq, it uses shell scripts, and I find it to be >"fast enough"... ipmasq is very nice, but it *is* a bit slow on my sparcstation 1+. (now don't get me wrong: almost everything is, on that box) an alte

联系

2002-08-27 Thread Micros
Title: iboss2000   office2000理财系列软件  ――― (office2000增值产品) 系统消息:本站承接对软件的个性化定制工作,质优价廉,欢迎垂询。   office2000财务系统v2.5   详细介绍    下载软件 注册>> office2000老板理财v1.2   详细介绍    下载软件 注册>>             版权所有:太阳雨软件设计室    联系我们

OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi *, For those who don't read long mails: Please test the ldap packages at http://www.ifg.uni-kiel.de/~torsten/preview/ I am about to upload new openldap packages with TLS support as requested frequently. Since it seems like in the short run there will be no libssl0.9.6 in base (or ex

Re: New package netfilter-init to experimental?

2002-08-27 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Marc Haber wrote: > machine takes seven minutes to build a new rule set. It is so slow > because everything is implemented as shell scripts. There are plans to > convert the significant part of code to C++ and to use iptables > --restore to establish the rule set instead of iss

testing script

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Meskes
Hi, I was just told the script updating testing doesn't run at the moment. Is that true? If so, is there a reason? Are we already in freeze? :-) Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael@Fam-Meskes.De Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

Re: unsubscribe mikael.petersson@lovelace.d2g.nu

2002-08-27 Thread Gerd Flaig
Gerd Flaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ unsubsribe instructions ] sorry, that wasn't meant to got to the list. The mail2news gate mangles the reply-to header and I was a little tired this morning so I didn't notice that it went to the list instead of the original poster until a kind person poi

PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Sobkowiak Krzysztof
Hallo I need to use oracle with php4 on Debian? How can I do it? Could somebody [help me] build php4-oracle package? Thanks K. Sobkowiak

Re: Migration to /usr/share/doc

2002-08-27 Thread Richard Braakman
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:48:13AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Perhaps I should use /usr/doc/ instead. Even shorter... I have been a happy man since I made a /doc symlink. Richard Braakman

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

2002-08-27 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:50:58PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:23:30 -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > It looks like Arai-san [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be most active. > > http://ns103.net/~arai is his URL > > > > He has new autoconf version. > > > > It looks to me people ar

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Joseph Carter
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:03:39AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > What's especially cool is that it hardwires the British (or Australian, > > in this case, I guess) spelling of `disc' as part of the UI, though > > `disk' seems far more widespread in the rest of the kernel (consistency, > >

Re: Migration to /usr/share/doc

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 27.08.02 um 09:41:50 schrieb Yenar Calentaure: > Just hit instead of tab, one keystroke isn't THAT much :). > Renameing the directory could solve your problem, but is it worth one > keystroke per typing /usr/share/doc/whatever? Yes, it is worth it. I often use docs, I often use the completio

Re: Sharp SPAM [marketing@sharpsystems.com: Special Price Offer for Select Sharp Systems Products]

2002-08-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 06:32:40PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > It appears that Sharp Systems systematically spammed writers to the > Debian-Laptop list, which certainly is an abuse of the debian lists. While your message seems perfectly valid per se, why are you spamming debian-devel with it? :

Re: unsubscribe mikael.petersson@lovelace.d2g.nu

2002-08-27 Thread Gerd Flaig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gerd Flaig Technik[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bei Schlund + Partner AG

Re: Migration to /usr/share/doc

2002-08-27 Thread Yenar Calentaure
Giorgio Mandolfo wrote: Hi everybody. This may be quite stupid or frivolous. :-) I have noticed the migration of the extra documentation files from /usr/doc/ to /usr/share/doc/ (as also describes the Debian Policy chapter 13.3). I am trying not to use exclusively the simbolic link to /usr/share/d

招聘业务人员

2002-08-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(本信件是广告信件,不满意请删除,对你的打搅表示歉意) 您好: 潍坊企业信息网因业务拓展的需要,现面向社会招聘市场营销人员10名,网页制作人员2名。联系电话:8583256,8708575 联系人:窦先生、季小姐 E_mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 祝: 万事如意! 潍坊企业信息网 200

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:43:05PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But if it is reliable i would recommend using it. It makes lot of things > > much easier and probably is much more intuitive for beginners as well. > > (just thinking of /dev/discs/disc0/pa

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What's especially cool is that it hardwires the British (or Australian, > in this case, I guess) spelling of `disc' as part of the UI, though > `disk' seems far more widespread in the rest of the kernel (consistency, > what's that?) In American Englis

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 00:43, Miles Bader wrote: > What's especially cool is that it hardwires the British (or Australian, > in this case, I guess) spelling of `disc' as part of the UI The idea that devfs hardwires anything seems to be very popular. It is also completely wrong. You can use the u

Re: Convenient way to enable IDE DMA

2002-08-27 Thread Chris Halls
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:11:18PM -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote: > The other question is how it should be enabled. One way is "hdparm -d 1 > /dev/hd?" or moral equivalent in an init script. The hwtools package includes a script with a placeholder for such hdparm tuning in /etc/init.d/hwtools: #

New package netfilter-init to experimental?

2002-08-27 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, where I work, I have developed a framework to flexibly initialize netfilter packet filter rules called netfilter-init. We install it from a debian file, and the code is licensed GPL. It currently does what we need, but that is not enough for a package in Debian. The package is currently lacki

Re: Accepted libmime-base64-perl 2.12-4.1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Joey Hess
Anthony Fok wrote: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:24:09 +0800 > Source: libmime-base64-perl > Binary: libmime-base64-perl > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 2.12-4.1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: high > Maintainer: Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Changed-By: Anthony F

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

2002-08-27 Thread Brian May
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:53:27PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > > Ideally, amavis needs access for all archive formats so it can check > > for viruses in E-Mail... > > You mean it must be able to UNpack those packed files attached to E-Mail? Yes. > > > P.S: I don't subscribe to mailing-lis