On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:50:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The entires in Packages files and those in the .deb must match exactly
> (ie byte for byte), otherwise it sees them as different packages. Since
> dpkg manipulates the status file and only has information from the .deb
> there is no
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
> Can't apt realize that if it is going to install a package from source
> X, it should use the Packages entry from source X too?
The entires in Packages files and those in the .deb must match exactly
(ie byte for byte), otherwise it sees them as different p
subscribe
Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-21
Severity: important
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux pentangle.dyndns.org 2.4.18-xfs-1.1 #1 Tue Aug 13 03:58:02 EDT
2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA
more specifically, received t
Hello,
I have just being playing around with apt-proxy, and noticed something
weird. Every time I run apt-get, it wants to upgrade the packages it
just upgraded 5 seconds ago (it only happens on this computer, too):
(note: se_apt-get is the same thing as apt-get, but sets
the selinux domain up co
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Things like libdb1 compliance, usage of nice(2), statistics for debhelper
> versus debstd usage, are all better collected by lintian.debian.org than
> by separate scripts.
I quite agree, and I would love to stop churning auric each morning
grepping the whole archive for the
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 23:56, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 23:28, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > > > Why?
> > > > Can't we just use it in Debian?
> > >
> > > Are you m
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 23:28, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > Why?
> > Can't we just use it in Debian?
>
> Are you mad? What happens if the ELF format or gnu upstream start using that
> value for something else?
I forgot to mention that if they wan
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 23:28, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > > Why?
> > > Can't we just use it in Debian?
> >
> > Are you mad? What happens if the ELF format or gnu upstream start using that
> > value
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 23:28, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > Why?
> > Can't we just use it in Debian?
>
> Are you mad? What happens if the ELF format or gnu upstream start using that
> value for something else?
We notify them of the problem.
Furth
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libsdl-anim
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Michael Leonhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://tamale.net/SDL_anim/
* License : LGPL
Description : Library to load animati
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please reply to
Receiver: China Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. (CMC)
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As one technical organization supported by China Investment and Technical
Promotion Office of United Nation Industry Development Organization (UNIDO), we
cooperate closely with th
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> Why?
> Can't we just use it in Debian?
Are you mad? What happens if the ELF format or gnu upstream start using that
value for something else?
Do it upstream, or don't do it. We also want the other distros to follow
whatever proper fix we make to the pn
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Steve Langasek wrote:
> FWIW, I find that -Bsymbolic tends to be useful in its own right; I've
Oh, it is *very* useful when not using versioned symbols. It's just that it
gets far more difficult to have namespace clashes when using versioned
symbols (as long as the versioning
---
Thank you for contacting Family Education Network! We will respond to your
inquiry as soon as possible.
We have listed some solutions to your question below. Please note that these
are only suggested solutions. Your email has b
Package: lintian
Version: 1.20.17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
> Rather than mass filing bugs, can you write a lintian check for it
> instead?
As promised, here is the check:
diff -u -urNad old/copyright-file new/copyright-file
--- old/copyright-file 2002-08-20 23:04:54.0 +0200
+++ ne
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 23:02, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > Apparently the "different interpretation" is what I was assuming the
> > current one.
>
> Yeah, I was in a severe headache for a while because I too knew about the
> old interpretation a
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 06:02:35PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > Apparently the "different interpretation" is what I was assuming the
> > current one.
> Yeah, I was in a severe headache for a while because I too knew about the
> old inter
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> Apparently the "different interpretation" is what I was assuming the
> current one.
Yeah, I was in a severe headache for a while because I too knew about the
old interpretation apparently.
> How about the implementing the GNU extension?
It would be us
Yes, you are right, by reading at the source it seems that ld.so only
searches the object with -Bsymbolic.
In fact there is this comment in the relevant file:
/* Create an appropriate searchlist. It contains only this map.
XXX This is the definition of DT_SYMBOLIC in SysVr4. The
Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> kernel-patch-int (should be superseded by cryptoapi; i can't find the time).
>
> Then there's some ITP's i (enthousiastically) did; i'm going to be closing
> them too. Interested people can upload and close at will, if they're faster
> than me: ricochet, loop-aes, cr
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:43:58AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
> > I beg your pardon? Which naiveness? That particular bit of libtool
> > solves a very real problem: dlopen is *not* portable.
>
> Careful here, dlopen is defined by SUSv2
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Then there's some ITP's i (enthousiastically) did; i'm going to be closing
> them too. Interested people can upload and close at will, if they're faster
> than me: ricochet, loop-aes, cryptoapi, ipsec-tunnel.
Please retitle them to RFP (request
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Roberto Gordo Saez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > A wild guess: I don't know about the files named lib*.la, but the other
> > > ones could be plug-ins. ltdl opens the .la file to find
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 10:06:20PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > > > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in
> > > > the primary runtime.
> > >
> > > ltdl needs them at runtime.
> >
> > Then ltdl is broken. How doe
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > Well, either this or using versioned symbols is required, and would have
> > almost the same effect.
> Do they work without needing to recompile programs?
They work without a recompile, BUT they fix nothing on that case: the first
symbol found will be
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:16:23PM +0200, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > using -Bsymbolic ensures that whenever the libpng library makes a call to
> > one of its own functions, the symbol is resolved internally instead of to
> > another version of libpng that's loaded. This may account for a majority
>
> using -Bsymbolic ensures that whenever the libpng library makes a call to
> one of its own functions, the symbol is resolved internally instead of to
> another version of libpng that's loaded. This may account for a majority
> of the segfaults that people are seeing. It does not affect how symb
> >> Rather than mass filing bugs, can you write a lintian check for it
> >> instead?
> >
> > He filed a bug about Upstream Author(s), I fixed it, and then shaleh and
> > others reverted it >:)
> >
>
> I think we have better things to be nitpicky about. Besides, lintian tries to
> only enforce
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 05:56:58PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > Some time ago, I assembled a list of packages which were arch: all,
> > yet used binary-arch to build the package, and another list of
> > packages whose debian/copyright did not have a pointer to the full
> > license.
>
> Rather
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 21:46, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > I propose to do the following to solve the libpng2/3 problem. I've
> > recompiled libpng2. libpng3 and libgtk2.0-0png3 locally and the system
> > seems to work correctly.
>
> > 1
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:25:06PM +0200, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> I propose to do the following to solve the libpng2/3 problem. I've
> recompiled libpng2. libpng3 and libgtk2.0-0png3 locally and the system
> seems to work correctly.
> 1. Recompile libpng2 and libpng3 with -Bsymbolic
>
Hi,
I'm going to orphan most of my packages. Before I upload them with
Maintainer: set to QA, i'd like people to look at them and see if they want
anything :)
Some of the - less intensive - packages I'm keeping, the others I can't keep
on maintaining due to several reasons (bought a house, plan to
Package: wnpp
Version: 0+4i; reported 2002-08-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: blosxom
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Rael Dornfest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://www.oreillynet.com/~rael/lang/perl/blosxom/downloads/blosxom
* License : MIT
Descr
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> I propose to do the following to solve the libpng2/3 problem. I've
> recompiled libpng2. libpng3 and libgtk2.0-0png3 locally and the system
> seems to work correctly.
> 1. Recompile libpng2 and libpng3 with -Bsymbolic
Well, either this or using
Anthony Towns writes:
> Things like libdb1 compliance, usage of nice(2), statistics for debhelper
> versus debstd usage, are all better collected by lintian.debian.org than
> by separate scripts.
Input for a database of historical MD5 hashes of individual files
would be nice, too.
--
Florian
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:33:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > If all goes well I have the month of September for lintian hacking.
> So how does lintian compare to linda these days? Will both be
> actively maintained and do the exact same thing?
linda
Previously Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> If all goes well I have the month of September for lintian hacking.
So how does lintian compare to linda these days? Will both be
actively maintained and do the exact same thing?
Wichert.
--
__
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:23:29AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 20-Aug-2002 Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:14:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >> Rather than mass filing bugs, can you write a lintian check for it
> >> instead?
> > He filed a bug about Upstream Author(
I propose to do the following to solve the libpng2/3 problem. I've
recompiled libpng2. libpng3 and libgtk2.0-0png3 locally and the system
seems to work correctly.
1. Recompile libpng2 and libpng3 with -Bsymbolic
2. Recompile all libraries that use either libpng2 or libpng3 to
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-20
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the ifenslave package.
The package description is:
This is a tool to attach and detach slave network interfaces to a bonding
device. A bonding device will act like a normal Ethernet network device to
the k
On 20-Aug-2002 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:23:29AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> >> Rather than mass filing bugs, can you write a lintian check for it
>> >> instead?
>> >
>> > He filed a bug about Upstream Author(s), I fixed it, and then shaleh and
>> > others reverted
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:23:29AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >> Rather than mass filing bugs, can you write a lintian check for it
> >> instead?
> >
> > He filed a bug about Upstream Author(s), I fixed it, and then shaleh and
> > others reverted it >:)
>
> I think we have better things
On 20-Aug-2002 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:14:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> Rather than mass filing bugs, can you write a lintian check for it
>> instead?
>
> He filed a bug about Upstream Author(s), I fixed it, and then shaleh and
> others reverted it >:)
>
I think we
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:14:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Rather than mass filing bugs, can you write a lintian check for it
> instead?
He filed a bug about Upstream Author(s), I fixed it, and then shaleh and
others reverted it >:)
> We've _finally_ got lintian running over the archive aga
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> I beg your pardon? Which naiveness? That particular bit of libtool
> solves a very real problem: dlopen is *not* portable.
Careful here, dlopen is defined by SUSv2, all the libtool hackage is does
is allow OS's to get away with not conforming
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 05:56:58PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Some time ago, I assembled a list of packages which were arch: all,
> yet used binary-arch to build the package, and another list of
> packages whose debian/copyright did not have a pointer to the full
> license.
Rather than mass fili
Hi!
Some time ago, I assembled a list of packages which were arch: all,
yet used binary-arch to build the package, and another list of
packages whose debian/copyright did not have a pointer to the full
license.
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to file the bugs at that time, so I redid
the test now. S
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: biopython
Version : 1.00a4
Upstream Author : Many, see http://www.biopython.org/Participants.shtml
* URL : http://www.biopython.org/
* License : Python-like, http://www.biopython.
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libsdl-sge
Version : 020104
Upstream Author : Anders Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.etek.chalmers.se/~e8cal1/sge/index.html
* License : LGPL
Description :
#include
* Marcelo E. Magallon [Tue, Aug 20 2002, 04:19:02PM]:
> > Yes, and this breaks the whole idea of SONAMES. I wonder how such shit
> > has ever been allowed to enter Debian.
>
> Are we still talking about plug-ins here? I had that impression.
>
> Say, how is a SONAME useful for a pl
>> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, and this breaks the whole idea of SONAMES. I wonder how such shit
> has ever been allowed to enter Debian.
Are we still talking about plug-ins here? I had that impression.
Say, how is a SONAME useful for a plugin? A plug-in is not somethin
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 12:34:36AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 11:34, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Read the instructions at the bottom of each message that you receive
> > from this list.
>
> Which he obviously did, given that he stated that he unsubscribed once,
> apparently succe
I've managed to patch both dpkg and glibc.
However the resulting system does not work because some things like KDE
use absolute paths so they would too need to be fixed.
Furthermore, we have the problem of C++ library packages including
non-C++ files. This can only be handled by heavily modifying
#include
* Marcelo E. Magallon [Tue, Aug 20 2002, 02:24:21PM]:
> I've seen is *that* stupid), but libtool produces filanames named after
> the platform's own conventions. So, under Linux you get libfoo.so and
> under HP/UX you get libfoo.sl. *That* information is stored in the .la
> file.
>> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because of naivity of some programers. I suggest to begin getting rid
> of such kludges and forbid usage of .la files at runtimer in the
> Policy for Sarge.
I beg your pardon? Which naiveness? That particular bit of libtool
solves a very real p
package: bubblemon
secerity: normal
i want to give away or orphan the bubblemon package, cause i cant maintein
gnome programs anymore. There are some issues with multiple versions which
may need to be resolved,. otherwise it is a very good load monitor, it realy
hels you to get a feeling for your
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 12:25:57PM +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2
> > and only have libfoo.la, and ltdl expect to work?
> > Broken...
> So, i guess that kdelibs3 (4:2.2.2-13) is also broken...
Absolu
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: psad
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Michael B. Rash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cipherdyne.com/
* License : (GPL)
Description : The Post Scan Attack Detector (
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
> Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in
> the primary runtime.
> ltdl needs them at runtime.
> and librep9 too.
I forgot my last c
>> Roberto Gordo Saez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > A wild guess: I don't know about the files named lib*.la, but the other
> > ones could be plug-ins. ltdl opens the .la file to find out the actual
>
> Yes, you are right, but... why does a plugin need both .s
#include
* Roberto Gordo Saez [Tue, Aug 20 2002, 02:01:44PM]:
> > A wild guess: I don't know about the files named lib*.la, but the other
> > ones could be plug-ins. ltdl opens the .la file to find out the actual
>
> Yes, you are right, but... why does a plugin need both .so and .la files?
Beca
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> A wild guess: I don't know about the files named lib*.la, but the other
> ones could be plug-ins. ltdl opens the .la file to find out the actual
Yes, you are right, but... why does a plugin need both .so and .la files?
(Please, CC to me also)
--
Roberto Gordo - Fre
George Frederick,
Banque Internationale Afrique,
Lome,Togo.
I am George Frederick,the director in charge of auditing and
accounting section of Banque internationale De l'Afrique(BIA) Togo-Lome West
Africa.
With due respect and regard. I have decided to contact you on a business
transaction that
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 12:18:31AM -0700, Ian Eure wrote:
> > Prism 2.5 PCI 802.11b adaptor support
> > CONFIG_PCI_HERMES
> > Enable support for PCI and mini-PCI 802.11b wireless NICs based on
> > the Prism 2.5 chipset. These are true PCI cards, not the 802.11b
> > PCMCIA cards bundled with
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:33:08PM -0400, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
>
> My understanding, perhaps flawed, is that Prism2.5 is basically a
> Prism2 with a direct PCI interface---no pcmcia baggage, etc. The
> Linksys WPM11, for instance.
My pcmcia card (TrendWare TEW-201PC) announces itself as a
>> Roberto Gordo Saez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ dpkg -L kdelibs3 | grep \\.la$
> /usr/lib/libDCOP.la
> /usr/lib/dcopserver.la
> /usr/lib/libkdefakes.la
> /usr/lib/libkdeui.la
> /usr/lib/libkdesu.la
> /usr/lib/libkssl.la
> diverted by kdelibs3-crypto to: /usr/lib/libkssl-nossl.la
> /
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-20
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: wxglade
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Alberto Griggio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://wxglade.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Descr
Ben Collins wrote:
> Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2
> and only have libfoo.la, and ltdl expect to work?
>
> Broken...
So, i guess that kdelibs3 (4:2.2.2-13) is also broken...
$ dpkg -L kdelibs3 | grep \\.la$
/usr/lib/libDCOP.la
/usr/lib/dcopserver.la
/usr/l
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 08:56:48PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Firewall died, taking down disk. New disk: clean install of Woody
> upgraded to testing. Two network cards: 3COM 3C905C 10/100M as
> (internal) card (eth0) 3COM Etherlink III as cable modem facing
> (external) card eth1.
>
> Si
On Monday 19 August 2002 05:33 pm, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Monday 19 August 2002 02:39 pm, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hedderly) writes:
> > > > No. the hostap dirver is excellent. Written by Jean Tour...
> > > > somethin
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > I "vote" that you get to write the menu file for gnuplot, which after
> > all has a graphical user interface, if it's fed the proper data file.
>
> Or fix my bug http://bugs.debian.org/139482
>
> I need a dialog utility to prompt for the file name
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> > In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every
> > program which has a user interface.
>
> I "vote" that you get to write the menu file for gnuplot, which after
> all has a graphical user interface, if it's
Liebe Geiz-kragen Community,
Du erhälst diesen Brief aufgrund deines Eintrages in unseren
Newsletter auf WWW.GEIZ-KRAGEN.DE
Dort kannst Du dich jederzeit ganz einfach auch wieder austragen.
1.) 70% Umsatz für Umsteiger
Einer der Marktführer im
On 20 Aug 2002 01:50:22 +0200
Luca Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Junichi's manual they should be in -dev packages (that
> makes sense, since they are only used by libtool builds).
My "solution" to the problem would be to create
libwhatever-la packages which contains .la file
Are there any plans for php support for apache2? I've played around w/
2.0.40 and a php cvs snapshot from sometime last week, w/ good results;
I'm looking forward to a php4-snapshot/php4-apache2 packages, or
something along those lines.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:35:13PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
>
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which he obviously did, given that he stated that he unsubscribed once,
> apparently successfully, still received mails, and then tried again, and
> the list said he wasn't subscribed.
And did he then contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] when he had trouble?
I guess i
77 matches
Mail list logo
