Já chegou o novo Nokia 7650

2002-08-11 Thread informacao
LOJADOTELEMOVEL.COM 12 de Agosto 2002 http://www.lojadotelemovel.com ][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][ BOAS FÉRIAS ][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][ --Ouça rádio e mantenha-se atento às chamadas Onde quer que se encontre, não perca o contacto com quem lhe liga. Auriculares com rádio FM stereo

Re: Archive link at the end of each post?

2002-08-11 Thread Carlos Laviola
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 08:34:31PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > I think the problem is that at the point the mailing list is forwarding the > message it has no idea where it is going to be archived so it cannot add a > reference. In my original idea there is no such problem, as you can n

Re: Pin and apt

2002-08-11 Thread Julien Danjou
Le Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:33:46PM +0200, Julien Danjou a écrit: > (In my local repository I have only 2 packages: icewm and icewm-common) It works fine with: deb file:/root/deb/ sid main So there is no more problem :-) -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian developer : :' : http://jdanjou.org `. `'

Re: New to the list, and need info

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 08:47:02PM -0400, Individual . . wrote: > I have subscribed to this list because I am nearing the end of my list > of possibilities. > > I am searching for a mailing list that will tolerate my simple c++ > questions. > > More specifically, I want to learn how to use lib

Bug#156356: ITP: db1-compat -- Berkeley DB 1 compatibility library

2002-08-11 Thread Colin Watson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: db1-compat (binary package libdb1-compat) Version : 3.1.3 (based on db1-addon-2.1.3.tar.bz2 from glibc) Upstream Author : Sleepycat Software * URL : http://www.sleepycat.com/ * License : Sleepycat licence, same as

Re: Bug#156257: ITP: libpam-ssh -- I didn't write it, I'm just working on it. It authenticates you by u

2002-08-11 Thread Roderick Schertler
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:43:41 +0900 (JST), Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 22:20:26 -0400, > Roderick Schertler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The pam_ssh PAM module allows you to authenticate yourself by supplying >> the passphrase for your SSH key (id_dsa, id_rsa, or

New to the list, and need info

2002-08-11 Thread Individual . .
Hello. I have subscribed to this list because I am nearing the end of my list of possibilities. I am searching for a mailing list that will tolerate my simple c++ questions. More specifically, I want to learn how to use libpng (a library for creating PNG images), and have found the documentati

Re: please remove current libsdl-image1.2, libsdl-perl etc. from sarge.

2002-08-11 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:38:29 +0900 (JST), Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:17:42 +0900 (JST), > Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 4. old foo, new libsdl-image1.2 and new libpng3 > Sorry, this is impossible. s/libpng3/libpng2/, now I see why emails suck. --

Re: Bug#156257: ITP: libpam-ssh -- I didn't write it, I'm just working on it. It authenticates you by u

2002-08-11 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 22:20:26 -0400, Roderick Schertler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The pam_ssh PAM module allows you to authenticate yourself by supplying > the passphrase for your SSH key (id_dsa, id_rsa, or identity in ~/.ssh). > Better yet, it can be to configured launch an ssh-agent and load t

Bug#156346: [ITP]: tads2-mode -- Emacs mode for editing TADS code

2002-08-11 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: tads2-mode Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : Stephen Granade * URL : http://www.ifarchive.org/if-archive/programming/editors/tads2-mode.el * License : GPL Description : Emacs mode for editing TADS code This

Re: Problems with freeswan upload

2002-08-11 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:21:44PM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > Since I am getting more and more bug-reports about users requesting an > updated package, I would like to get this resolved quickly. Therefore, I > am happy about any hint on what I am doing wrong (RTFM with a pointer to > the respe

Re: The dependencies of libc6 must handle packages that break without db1

2002-08-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:34:13AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:14:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 09:56:30AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > Sounds like a good idea. Someone has already offered to do exactly this > > > (and please don't use the

Re: mirroring question

2002-08-11 Thread Jonathan Oxer
Oops! > > Or you could try Apt-cacher: > http://www.apt-cacher.com/ > http://www.apt-cacher.org/

Re: mirroring question

2002-08-11 Thread Jonathan Oxer
> apt-move and demish are really mirror programs that rely on apt for > downloading of packages, while apt-proxy is 'just' a cache (you could > also try squid instead of apt-proxy). Or you could try Apt-cacher: http://www.apt-cacher.com/ Jonathan Oxer Ph +61 3 9723 9399 / Fx +61 3 9723 4899 GPG

Re: Why db_input ... || true

2002-08-11 Thread Stefan Hornburg Racke
Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Holger Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is it possible that lintian searches this entrys (in the sense: is > > it possible to change lintian). > > It is. But db_* commands return status for a reason, so people may > want to omit the "|| true

Re: Bug#156257: ITP: libpam-ssh -- SSH key authentication and single sign-on via PAM

2002-08-11 Thread Roderick Schertler
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 06:59:29 +0200, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > With such a PAM module installed anyone who can write to your home directory > can change your password. The module provides only PAM auth and session components, so they can't literally change your password. Yes, if

Re: Pin and apt

2002-08-11 Thread Julien Danjou
Le Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 04:01:55PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman a écrit: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 07:50:31PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > > Le Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:32:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman a ?crit: > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: It looks > > > like you ar

Problems with freeswan upload

2002-08-11 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, [Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to debian-devel.] I have, most probably due to my own stupidity, problems uploading new packages of freeswan. Since 2002-08-05, there is a 1.98b-1 package sitting in queue/new on ftp-master

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 07:52:04PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:29:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > > > Rather 'chmod +x /usr/bin/make' according to the error message. Weird. > > > > It is a confusi

Re: Pin and apt

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 07:50:31PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > Le Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:32:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman a ?crit: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: It looks > > like you are providing the same package versions from both sources. > > It's right. >

Re: RFD: Architecture field being retarded? [was: How to specify architectures *not* to be built?]

2002-08-11 Thread Andreas Rottmann
> "Roland" == Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Roland> Andreas Rottmann wrote: >> I think in the light of upcoming *BSD ports, the HURD port and >> the (hopefully not too distant ;-)) possibility of getting the >> HURD ported to other CPU families, we really need

Re: transition plan to gtk 2.0

2002-08-11 Thread Andres Salomon
Definitely not; sinek and gde both required some pretty extensive changes to function normally w/ gtk2.. On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 03:37:36AM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > > > Some random packages use gtk 2.0 now. What is the transition > > plan to gtk 2.0? I think every library which depends on

Re: mirroring question

2002-08-11 Thread Admar Schoonen
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 04:03:05PM -0400, Loren Jordan wrote: > I just want to pull a copy of these packages just like they sit in the > apt-get'able directory structure so I don't have to re-create the > Packages[.gz] files and such... use apt-move, apt-proxy or demish (http://luon.net/~admar)

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 11 August 2002 20:03, Paul Cupis wrote: > On Sunday 11 August 2002 18:52, Daniel Kobras wrote: > > % chmod a-x debian/rules > > *Ahem* > > chmod a+x debian/rules Never mind. /me smacks himself Paul Cupis - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 11/08/2002 Daniel Kobras wrote: > % chmod a+x debian/rules > % sudo chmod a-x /usr/bin/make First line right, second is moronic. /usr/bin/make is a binary, it must be executable. bye mejo

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 11 August 2002 18:52, Daniel Kobras wrote: > % chmod a-x debian/rules *Ahem* chmod a+x debian/rules Paul Cupis - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9VrUQIzuKV+SHX/kRAuugAJ9rpyEw

Re: RFD: Architecture field being retarded? [was: How to specify architectures *not* to be built?]

2002-08-11 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
Andreas Rottmann wrote: > I think in the light of upcoming *BSD ports, the HURD port and the > (hopefully not too distant ;-)) possibility of getting the HURD ported > to other CPU families, we really need improvement here. http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt -- Roland Bauerschmi

RFD: Architecture field being retarded? [was: How to specify architectures *not* to be built?]

2002-08-11 Thread Andreas Rottmann
> "Russell" == Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Russell> On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:35, Geert Stappers wrote: >> When the cause of the buildproblem is in the package, fix the >> problem there. The package maintainer hasn't to do it by >> himself, he can/must/should coopera

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:29:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > > Rather 'chmod +x /usr/bin/make' according to the error message. Weird. > > It is a confusing (confused) error message. The permission problem is with > the script,

Re: Pin and apt

2002-08-11 Thread Julien Danjou
Le Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:32:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman a écrit: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~-> apt-cache policy icewm icewm-common > > icewm: > > Installed: (none) > > Candidate: 1.2.0-1 > > Version Table: > > 1.2.0-1 0 > >

Re: Pin and apt

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~-> apt-cache policy icewm icewm-common > icewm: > Installed: (none) > Candidate: 1.2.0-1 > Version Table: > 1.2.0-1 0 > 500 http://debian.mirrors.easynet.fr sid/main Packages > 999 file:

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:05:23PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote: > > > > chmod +x debian/rules > > Rather 'chmod +x /usr/bin/make' according to the error message. Weird. It is a confusing (confused) error message. The permission p

Re: debugging g++ 3.1 compiled apps

2002-08-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 09:25:21AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Do you mean C++? > > The subject says g++ so I would guess he uses C++. > > > It's being worked on. Slowly; it's very complicated. > > Just out of curiosity, what's the problem? I

Re: junkbuster is gone

2002-08-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-07 22:33]: > Martin> junkbuster was removed from Debian; therefore closing this > Martin> ITA. > Having previously spoken to the privoxy maintainer about merging the > two packages, I heartily concur. Can you go through the open bugs of junkbuster and

Strange idea

2002-08-11 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello debian-devel. I was reading the threads about libpng[23] and glibc/db1 than cause incompatabilities that are hard to describe with debian dependency control fields. And I've got an idea. What about adding one more field with the following semantics. If package P has FirstCompatable: N i

Bug#156300: ITP: avview -- TV viewing and capture software for ATI video cards from the GATOS project

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-11 Severity: wishlist * Package name: avview Version : 0.9.5 Upstream Author : Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://gatos.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : TV viewing and capture so

Bug#156298: ITP: gatos-km -- video4linux drivers for ATI video cards from the GATOS project

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-11 Severity: wishlist * Package name: gatos-km Version : (CVS) Upstream Author : Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://gatos.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : video4linux drivers for

Pin and apt

2002-08-11 Thread Julien Danjou
Hello, I am truing to get a Pin to works. Could someone explain me why it does not install icewm from my local repository ? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~-> cat /etc/apt/preferences Package: * Pin: release o=acid Pin-Priority: 999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/apt/lists

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:54:34PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote: > Could someone please help me interpret this clisp 2.28 build error: > > $dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is clisp > dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1:2.28-1 > dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Adam Warner
Hi Bart Schuller, >> sh: debian/rules: /usr/bin/make: bad interpreter: Permission denied > > chmod +x debian/rules Of course! Thanks Bart and Daniel. The resulting diff of debian/rules to compile in POSIX regular expression support for CLISP is below. 28a29 > --with-module=rege