Hello,
I have bug #142292, #109237 and #106414 for procps. The common thing
is that if System.map file is a multiple of 1024 (or 4096 not sure
which) ps crashes. Thanks to Dark for getting me that far.
Can someone look at 106414 and Dark's analysis and help me out here?
I'm not subscribed to d
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:39:54PM -0500, David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > birthdays. Many of us haven't read _every_ posting on _every_
> > debian list for the past six years and may therefore once in
> > a whi
gphotocoll just moved from non-US to main. It hasn't been compiled for
all architectures yet, and the source is actually in both archives at
the moment. The testing scripts rightly rejected it:
trying: gphotocoll
skipped: gphotocoll (152+1)
got: 8+0: a-8
* alpha: gphotocoll
But then it lo
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Torsten Landschoff replied that "This was the whole idea of
> testing. Experience shows it does not work."
>
> I think testing is an excellent thing to have, since it
> provides a semi-stable proto-release. Unfortunately it is
> tru
On 12 Apr 2002, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think some more details is required regarding rproxy.
I've added a lot more detail about rproxy, and my understanding of
Goswin's proposal. Let me know if they're unclear.
> Why is nobody actively developing it?
I'm not sure what kind of
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
> birthdays. Many of us haven't read _every_ posting on _every_
> debian list for the past six years and may therefore once in
> a while bring up some issue that has been discussed previously.
This isn't exactly every debian list for th
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> > > on a CD and try boo
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> > on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy.
...
> I just tested it on all
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Brian May wrote:
> I think some more details is required regarding rproxy.
>
> Why is nobody actively developing it?
>
> AFAIK, it solves all the problems regarding server load discussed in
> rsync, doesn't it???
No. I tested it out, and it still hits the server hard.
--
Ok that is it.
I have increased the limit size of spamc (with -s) and the message got a
nice :
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.3 required=5.0
tests=FROM_MALFORMED,FROM_NO_USER,BADTRANS_WORM,MISSING_HEADERS version=2.11
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 F
Johnny Ernst Nielsen: Don't worry about flames launched by
cranky developers who didn't get what they wanted for their
birthdays. Many of us haven't read _every_ posting on _every_
debian list for the past six years and may therefore once in
a while bring up some issue that has been discussed pre
On Apr 11, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> To make things worse, 3.0 contents will at the time of release
> already be about 6 months out of date.
Here's a challenge for you: identify the top date in the changelog for
the current version of every package in testing (3.0). I doubt
there's a single
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:07:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
> > I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
> > scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
> > as below :
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:15:43PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
> couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
> of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
> will be useful.
>
> http
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> and dput?
Dumb question, but what dput, and why is one better then the other?
(please leave lang
On Apr 11, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> > on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy. If it doesn't
> > work on a machine where a potato CD does boot, please mail the lists!
>
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
> I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
> scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
> as below :
spamassassin, by default, does not check messages larger than 250k. Mess
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:29:04AM +, Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:40:47 +0100:
> > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dup
quiero el read player ¿como le hago?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
> moments and take this as a contructive proposal as other normal
> grownups would do?
Having discussed all this before in my 6 year old tenure with Debian,
no, I really don't have time to rehash it
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: med-imaging-dev
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : local file
* License : GPL
Description : Debian Med packages for medical image deve
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: med-imaging
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : local file
* License : GPL
Description : Debian Med imaging packages
Part of Debian-Med
Th
>>"christophe" == christophe barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christophe> Would it be possible for the new 'David D.W. Downey' to
christophe> hijack the identity of the old 'David D.W. Downey' and
christophe> then upload packages without getting his new key signed
christophe> by a dd ?
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adding them to build-essential would take a policy amendment...but now that
> we've reached a consensus on debian-devel, they can be Essential: yes
> instead.
That's as it should be, anyway. Now to move at least emacs from /usr
to / so that it can rep
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:52:54PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 13:20, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > And build-depend on all available versions of emacs...
>
> That'd be silly. Instead, we should just add them to build-essential.
Adding them to build-essential would take a po
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
> couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
> of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
> will be useful.
>
> http://rsync.samba.org/rs
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
> I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
> scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
> as below :
>
> # SPAMASSASSIN
> :0fw
> | spamc -f
Could it be that spamd
I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
as below :
# SPAMASSASSIN
:0fw
| spamc -f
:0e
{
EXITCODE=$?
}
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
junk
# End of SPAMASSASSIN section
And t
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:46:55PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> I am not a developer, and I am not suited for code development.
> But I would like to spend untill 1St of May collecting additional
> information about the release procedures.
Currently that is black magic, mostly the relea
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: enigma
Version : 0.38a
Upstream Author : Daniel Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/enigma/
* License : GPL
Description : A game where you contr
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
> thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
>
> Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
> moments and take this
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:44:36PM +0200, Rune B. Broberg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> > Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
> > thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
> >
> > Do you think you
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 13:20, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> > Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
> > > at runtime, not at install time.
> >
> > So you're say
Good day Matt,
thank you for your kind answer.
> > At the current pace 3.0 may be out right around May 1St 2002.
> > At that time it will have been more than 1 year and 6 months
> > since the previous point release, which by then contains packages
> > more than 1 year and 6 months old.
>
> Er, it
Good day Torsten,
thank you for your kind answer.
> > The main proposal is to introduce a fixed short Testing
> > development period into the development cycle like this:
> >
> > 1. Feed Unstable packages to Testing for a fixed short period of
> > time. 2. Freeze, bugfix, release.
> > Repeat.
>
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
> thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
>
> Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
> moments and take this
Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
moments and take this as a contructive proposal as other normal
grownups would do?
If you think I h
Anthony Towns writes:
> Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy. If it doesn't
> work on a machine where a potato CD does boot, please mail the lists!
I have a Digital Celebris GL180 that does not appe
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
Beta packages can be found at:
http://tabaluga.ipe.uni-stuttgart.de/~nils/download/
Cheers,
--
Luis Bustamante[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
Em Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:00:41 -0400, christophe barbé
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Would it be possible for the new 'David D.W. Downey' to hijack the
> identity of the old 'David D.W. Downey' and then upload packages without
> getting his new key signed by a dd ?
no no, he needs to get his key
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:47:33AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Have you done anything that I can't do as well right now? I
> mean, I can download your old key, create a new one, and do all you
> have outlined?
>
> manoj
Because I am not yet an official dd (I am waiting for the
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:39:33AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:10:28PM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
>
> > Not much more I can do since the old secret key and public keyrings were
> > lost. It's going to have to suffice as I have taken every step possible
> > to ensure
I don't understand why all theses packages are not entering woody.
As Julien explained, everything seems to be clean.
I believe we need some manual help.
Thanks,
Christophe
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Hi *,
>
> [libusb-dependent pa
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:33:34PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > If there are only proprietary programs that do a specific job, and it
> > is desired to have a free program for this job, then we are forced to
> > reinvent th
On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy. If it doesn't
> work on a machine where a potato CD does boot, please mail the lists!
I just test
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of "tom", an experimental programming language. The
archives contain a version from October 1999. Trying to recompile it now
on a sid machine fails.
Upstream development on this implementation was already dead, as they
switched to a new system writen in tom itself. And ther
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:49:45PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> To clarify, not all of these packages are buggy in sid. The ones (by
> source package) that have a problem appear to be something like this at
> the moment:
>
> courier-ssl dbf2sql ddt gql gtksql guile-pg libch libnss-pgsql
> nets
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:09:58AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > > > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > > > > me so
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > the
> > USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
>
> This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:43, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Witness the response to Jeroen.
I don't think we can draw any conclusion from the response to Jeroen
other than "a lot of us think rudeness is a bad thing". (Including even
Jeroen himself, per his apology a few flames back in that thread.)
-
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:20:27PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> The main proposal is to introduce a fixed short Testing development
> period into the development cycle like this:
>
> 1. Feed Unstable packages to Testing for a fixed short period of time.
> 2. Freeze, bugfix, release.
> R
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The membership also seems
> to have shifted towards a more radical^H^H^H^Henthusiastic support of
> _only_ free software, and helping people use whatever they wish on
> Debian, while providing them with free alternatives, seems to be on
> the wane
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:20:27PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> At the current pace 3.0 may be out right around May 1St 2002.
> At that time it will have been more than 1 year and 6 months since
> the previous point release, which by then contains packages more than
> 1 year and 6 months
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
The first place to check when you have questions about the status of a
package is http://bugs.debian.org/. In this case, you would have
found:
* #92698: IMP3 yes it is a
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
> > at runtime, not at install time.
>
> So you're saying that the maintainer should need to either create
> separate pac
hi.
just tested the woody-bootdisks (for a installation via network).
unfortunaly i can't load the driver-disks (driver-1.img and driver-2.img). i
always get a critical error with the message 'unable to mount the floppy
disk'.
this is why i can't install debian on the hard disks (scsi-disks on an
Anthony Towns wrote:
Hi *,
[libusb-dependent packages not making it into Woody]
> sane-backends has two RC bugs, one of which has been open for more than a
> week. 139509 appears like it should get sane-backends to build on mips; it's
> not clear what'll fix it on alpha, but that needs to happe
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:46:12AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > Oh, and 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel
>
> Wonderful news! Does this mean that we can expect the
> '-the-linux-kernel-packages-should-all-have-linux-in-the-name-'
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > That's fine with me. At least I'll have a lot more leisure when using
> > an available product instead of re-inventing the wheel. Even RMS used
> > commercial software when the GNU software for it was not yet written.
> > With you
>>"David" == David D W Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> So far I've done the following
David> 1) Replaced the OLD key (42D8F306) with the NEW one (C5A76BF6).
Replaced where?
David> 2) Signed the OLD public key (42D8F306) with the NEW one (C5A76BF6).
David> 3) Posted the OL
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> If there are only proprietary programs that do a specific job, and it
> is desired to have a free program for this job, then we are forced to
> reinvent the wheel by the proprietary programs licenses.
Forced to by whom? By Jeroen,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> Did YOU help introducing ANY new features in boot-floppies? I18n? Kernel
> 2.4, other filesystems, RAID support, lots of bugfixes in the existing
> code, etc. etc.? Either you can continue your mission of distruction,
> or you stop
>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> The byte compilation should be done when the package is built,
Adam> not at runtime, not at install time.
That's certainly an opinion, though it does not address the
technical reasons that prompted the compile-at-install behaviou
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Are you being serious or was that rhetorical? [0]
> [0] There was a time when I wouldn't've had a second thought about
> the answer to that question, either... :)
I think "facetious" is the word you're looking for. :-P
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
>>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> I'd be happy to hear clarifications from the author and
Steve> contemporaries, then; to be honest, my memory of Debian
Steve> history isn't good enough to even know who to approach. (The
Steve> debian-doc package is conspicuously
Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> Debian's current problem with old packages can be seen by the fact
> that a number of vendors have reportedly dumped the current Stable
> release in favor of the Testing distribution some time ago.
> That can only mean that currentness of content has become more
> i
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:57:26PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> These packages have not needed any updates.
[...]
> Is it really necessary to make a new upload, rather
> than copying or linking these packages to the pool?
>
> I will make a new upload before the woody release if it is
>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:02:28PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > 10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of
> > > booting the installation system.
> >
> > a) isolinux is not completely new. It is syslinux, extended with ability
> >of reading iso9660. Show me on
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of the
> USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
Protocol. How can a Linux Router speek
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:15:24PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> > No. This is directed at the people who would mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > mesages like "Go home proprietary l0s0rz! j00 are l4m3! Debian doesn't
> > need you! Signed, [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> Well, it seems to me like you're impl
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
> >security problem
>
> So are there any objections if I clone this bug and reassign the grave
> clones to xchat, ssh, vim, lftp, galeon, ytalk, etc? I've found that
> middle-cl
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Did YOU help introducing ANY new features in boot-floppies? I18n? Kernel
> 2.4, other filesystems, RAID support, lots of bugfixes in the existing
> code, etc. etc.? Either you can continue your mission of distruction, or
> you stop c
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> Oh, and 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel
Wonderful news! Does this mean that we can expect the
'-the-linux-kernel-packages-should-all-have-linux-in-the-name-'
thread to not repeat itself?
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp1zKoq
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> The method described on http://www.sateh.com/hacks/alcatel.php certainly
> looks like a hack. It basically describes a way to convert a Home model
> to a Pro model without paying. Given
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
> > > som
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:55:03PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:45:35AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman écrivait:
> > On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a
> > core component mere weeks before the scheduled release? There is no way
> > that it c
NOTE!
I am *not* talking about release dates.
(Anyone who starts talking release dates from hereon will be taken
out back and given an ice cold shower-down ;o))
Through time many people have criticised Stable Debian for having an
extremely slow release cycle, which causes an outdated distributio
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:08:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
> >security problem
> >Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott
> >Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security.
> S
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:08:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
> >security problem
> >Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott
> >Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security.
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:08:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
> >security problem
> >Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott
> >Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security.
>
> * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
>security problem
>Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott
>Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security.
So are there any objections if I clone this bug and reassign the grav
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:15:08AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 09:31:12PM:
> > I have installed many SCSI systems (including the one that I'm using right
> > now) with potato CD #1, which I assume has a similar configuration. I've
>
> Your
Hi Matt,
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:45:35AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman écrivait:
> > release is coming soon ... and we need a bit of feedback about
> > a new feature we plan to use on CD1 of Debian woody for i386.
>
> On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core
> compone
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is a document, and what is a program? How can Debian even begin
> to distinguish what makes free documentation different from free
> software when we can't distinguish whether a particular piece of
> data is software or documentation in the first pla
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > > > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
> > > >
Good day Baz,
> > I am researching the Debian release cycle.
> > Where can I find information about how long time there should be
> > between a Stable release and the next Testing freeze?
> > I have searched the Debian web site and the mailings lists, but I
> > have not found any such information.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
> > > some time left for leisure or for working on stuff like free software.
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
> > some time left for leisure or for working on stuff like free software.
>
> You r
I agree that debian doesn't have no fixed dates for the release. And I
think that's a good thing about debian, but i researched about this, and
I would like to know if there is a defined roadmap for woody becoming
frozen... What's the target milestone?
Em Qui, 2002-04-11 às 10:27, Bas Zoetekouw es
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 06:32, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
> I'm trying to set up my Debian machine as a gateway to the outside network,
> with (for now) one windows machine going through it via a hub (Linksys
> router). I've followed instructions for both Debian and Redhat to set it up,
> but after I foll
Hi Johnny!
You wrote:
> I am researching the Debian release cycle.
> Where can I find information about how long time there should be
> between a Stable release and the next Testing freeze?
> I have searched the Debian web site and the mailings lists, but I
> have not found any such information
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> some solutions for it (namely using a good, free MUA). You just let
> the person helpless, I try to point him to the fix. However if you try
> to help somebody you should not be a debian developers because you
> said that non-free software is the problem
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > > the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
> >
> > Yes, but often the line comes in many meters
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> > > from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > dnrd log
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
>
> Yes, but often the line comes in many meters away from the system, and
> the simplest thing is then to run some UTP to
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > Isn't the goal of Debian
>> > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
>> > software anymore?
>>
>> No, no, nonono, no, no, no.
>
> 4. Our Priorities are Our U
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> > > from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > dnrd logtrend-consolidation p
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Isn't the goal of Debian
> > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
> > software anymore?
>
> No, no, nonono, no, no, no.
4. Our Priorities are Our Users and F
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
