subscribe

2002-04-01 Thread chanka perera
hi, i'm a undergraduat student in computer science and IT i'm much more intersting in linux system actually i'm user in SCO unix/Debian/rea hat/suse and my home pc is Red Hat linux and win2000 sever i'm currently working as a labssitent.. i'm good in C/C++,java,html ..etc can you please help me to

unsubscribe

2002-04-01 Thread Sébastien
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#140863: ITP: babygimp -- An icon editor in Perl-Tk

2002-04-01 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-01 Severity: wishlist * Package name: babygimp Version : 0.41 Upstream Author : Christian Lederer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://babygimp.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : An icon editor in Perl

Re: ccache for the autobuilders?

2002-04-01 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:48:49AM +0200, Paul Russell wrote: > On Monday 01 April 2002 18:23, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > > The same package: almost never > > > the same file: often, with every new compile. > > > > > > Just take into acco

Re: Packages file (long email) [WAS: Splitting Packages]

2002-04-01 Thread Jens Ruehmkorf
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jens Ruehmkorf wrote: > On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote: > > Any complexity theorist will tell you that optimizing away constant > > factors gains you nothing in the long run, especially when you lose > > robustness by doing so. > > If at least the constant would be high

Re: ITP: rootkit - a Ro0Tk1t 4 Deb1an boxxxen

2002-04-01 Thread Erich Schubert
I felt oblieged to announce this package on slashdot ;) http://slashdot.org/developers/02/04/01/162223.shtml?tid=90 We got quite some positive feedback ;) "It's about time. As usual, Debian shows the great leadership that we have all come to expect from the project. The addition of a r00tk1t is

Re: ITP: rootkit - a Ro0Tk1t 4 Deb1an boxxxen

2002-04-01 Thread Joey Hess
Marco d'Itri wrote: > But rootkits "are only likely to be useful if you already know what > they are or have specialised requirements". Ah, but useful to whom? It is clearly in the best interest of some of our users for a rootkit to be installed by default. Debian will gain more users by doing so.

Re: ccache for the autobuilders?

2002-04-01 Thread Paul Russell
On Monday 01 April 2002 18:23, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > The same package: almost never > > the same file: often, with every new compile. > > > > Just take into account that a package contains 50 .c files that need > > to be compiled. An

Re: BSP?

2002-04-01 Thread Joey Hess
Adam Heath wrote: > On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a > > lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches. > > Is this a poor attempt at an April Fool's joke? Well, no. What makes you think it might be one? -- see shy jo -

Re: libsmpeg0 shlibs is broken, fix it or we shalt lose whatever.

2002-04-01 Thread Joe Drew
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 00:09, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > libsmpeg0 is broken, it will break upgrades from Debian 2.2 to 3.0. I'm not convinced. Show me real packages that break. > Either it gets removed (along with whatever list of games we have), > or fix it. > > Anyone interested in fixing it? A

Re: BSP?

2002-04-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:20:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a > lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches. That might be worthwhile. Any QA people prepared to organize it? Things are promising to be a little hectic for me over the n

Re: Packages file (long email) [WAS: Splitting Packages]

2002-04-01 Thread Jens Ruehmkorf
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 02:49:53PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > > If we always have to stick 100% to Policies and possible breaks than > > we should just leave things like they are now. People rised a serious > > problem and the idea is to try to

Re: BSP?

2002-04-01 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:03:33 -0300 Andre Luis Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:20:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a > > lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches. > > I'd love to see another BSP if you'r

Re: BSP?

2002-04-01 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Joey Hess wrote: > Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a > lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches. Is this a poor attempt at an April Fool's joke? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#140848: ITP: rocks -- Make network sockets reliable in a transparent way

2002-04-01 Thread Guus Sliepen
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-02 Severity: wishlist * Package name: rocks Version : 2.1 Upstream Author : Victor C. Zandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~zandy/rocks/ * License : LGPL Description : Make network sockets re