Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Christopher Yeoh
Santiago Vila writes: > something other than "2.2" or "testing/unstable" could potentially > break any script or program which expects /etc/debian_version to be > either "2.2" or "testing/unstable" (since this is what base-files provides). > In this case not only there is no benefit from changing

Re: dpkg-statoverride vs. suidmanager

2001-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
I just read this whole bloody thread again for the last time. Here is what we decided to do: > > * New suidmanager depends on new dpkg, and on upgrade, imports all > > local suid.conf overrides into statoverride. > > * New packages do not need to register with suidregister, so they will >

Re: LILO 21.6-2

2001-01-05 Thread Chris Rutter
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Russell Coker wrote: > You don't have sym-links to the root directory? Why not? There's absolutely no need or necessarily a desire to do so; besides which, the point is moot: if you're in the automation arena, you'll notice that kernel-package no longer produces them. Trying

RE: LILO 21.6-2

2001-01-05 Thread Marc Wilson
A better question is WHY have links to the root? Not everyone uses kpkg... and lots of people see value in keeping the root clean. I certainly do. NEVER MAKE ASSUMPTIONS. You *think* you'll have the next version take a list of kernel locations? You are missing the whole point here... whyinhell

Re: LILO 21.6-2

2001-01-05 Thread Brian May
> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adam> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Russell Coker wrote: >> You don't have sym-links to the root directory? Why not? >> >> Hmm. I think I'll make the next version take a list of kernel >> locations. Adam> kernel-package doesn

Re: LILO 21.6-2

2001-01-05 Thread Adam Heath
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Russell Coker wrote: > You don't have sym-links to the root directory? Why not? > > Hmm. I think I'll make the next version take a list of kernel locations. kernel-package doesn't do them anymore. BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L++

Re: LILO 21.6-2

2001-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Russell Coker wrote: > You don't have sym-links to the root directory? Why not? Because there is no need? > > Yes. They were submitted to me by a Hungarian. I am already in the process > of fixing grammar and spelling. Good. -- see shy jo

Re: LILO 21.6-2

2001-01-05 Thread Russell Coker
On Saturday 06 January 2001 15:08, Joey Hess wrote: > Russell Coker wrote: > > I have just uploaded LILO 21.6-2 to Woody. I have made it use debconf > > for all the common settings (I can configure lilo.conf for all my > > machines using only debconf). Please test it and let me know of any > > ot

Re: LILO 21.6-2

2001-01-05 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > This program only reinstall LiLO with the already given options. > You can reconfigure LiLO with the dpkg-reconfigure lilo or you can use > the old configuration tool, which is now named oldliloconfig. > Here we will run lilo, but now for security rea

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:33:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > Joey Hess (See Bug#81249) complains about the fact that local changes > to /etc/debian_version are not preserved on upgrades (he wants this > file to read "unstable" instead of the current "testing/unstable"). > > What should I do?

Re: LILO 21.6-2

2001-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Russell Coker wrote: > I have just uploaded LILO 21.6-2 to Woody. I have made it use debconf for > all the common settings (I can configure lilo.conf for all my machines using > only debconf). Please test it and let me know of any other settings that > should be added for debconf. > > Also I

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-05 Thread Mathias Gygax
On Sam, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:52:17 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > I'll try and make the next version do what you > require. well it's not necessary, but what about a boot message like: _-_ _-- __ _ ___-

Re: lilo.conf

2001-01-05 Thread Luca Filipozzi
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:52:17PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > I am working on the Debian package of lilo and am writing code for > auto-generating lilo.conf files. > image=/vmlinuz.old > label=old the 'old' image should be optional... i.e., add the optional keyword > other=/dev/ide/host0/

lilo.conf

2001-01-05 Thread Russell Coker
I am working on the Debian package of lilo and am writing code for auto-generating lilo.conf files. Below is an example of the type of lilo.conf that can be generated. The debconf asks whether you want boot or boot-menu as the boot loader, it asks what VGA mode you want, what parameters to append

diskless package and devfs (Linux 2.4.x)

2001-01-05 Thread Brian May
Hello, would anyone object if I made the diskless package depend on devfs support from 2.4.x in future versions? First I will wait until the kernel becomes a bit more stable before I make any changes. However, I believe that devfs support will make things considerably simpler. Now you only need

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Santiago Vila
Joey Hess wrote: > Santiago Vila wrote: > > In short: The reason you want to change /etc/debian_version is really > > a technical one or it is purely aesthetical (which is what I suspect)? > > I know that the system is and will be running unstable in the future. > I'm the only admin. So I'm probabl

Re: Upcoming Events in Germany

2001-01-05 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
Hi Joey and others! ++ 06/01/01 00:46 +0100 - Martin Schulze: > For these events in eastern Europe there is no Debian booth yet but > there could be if people want to organize it. So if you are > interested, please get in touch with me. > > April 23 Praha > April 24 Budapest > April

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > Does 2.4 now also include the information on which loop devices are > related to which filesystems? AFAIK that's the only thing that went > strange after linking /proc/mounts and /etc/mtab; loop devices not being > freed after unmounting. Ah, I knew there was somet

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
Joey Hess wrote: > I think /etc/mtab is on its way out. A 2.4.x kernel with devfs has a > /proc/mounts that actually has a proper line for the root filesystem. > Linking the two files would probably actually work on such a system > without breakage. Does 2.4 now also include the information on whi

Re: rsync mirror script for pools - first pre alpha release

2001-01-05 Thread esoR ocsirF
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:13:26PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > Suggestions to the script are welcome, esspecially: How do I make > debconf popup a checklist like: > > ++ > | What distributions should be mirrored? | > |

Re: ITP: Bakery

2001-01-05 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Friday 05 January 2001 10:35, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Mariusz! Hi, > You wrote: > > Bakery is a C++ Framework for creating GNOME applications using Gnome-- > > (gnomemm) and Gtk-- (gtkmm). > > What's the difference with Glade? Eeee. What's the difference with Glade-- rather? As you know Gl

Re: libglide2: debconf didn't ask question even for failed answer

2001-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Stephen Zander wrote: > Hmm, why then does the following snippet > > only prompt the user every *second* time it's executed? I have no idea. Provide me with a DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer log of this happening and I'll tell you. -- see shy jo

Re: BIND 9.X, shared libraries, and package pools

2001-01-05 Thread Brian May
> "Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Josip> Oh, of course. (Packages including several shared libraries Josip> suck as far as our naming scheme is concerned :o) Does bind come with multiple libraries? If so, I think they should really be split up, according to standard

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Joey Hess wrote: > > BTW, what is that file doing in /etc if it is not a configuration file? > > It is a configuration file. Whoops, I somehow managed to miss it when listing dpkg's conffiles. -- see shy jo

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Joey Hess wrote: > BTW, what is that file doing in /etc if it is not a configuration file? It is a configuration file. Wichert. -- / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: package pool and big Packages.gz file

2001-01-05 Thread Matthijs Melchior
Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Hint: Read the bug page for APT to discover why! > Looking through the apt bugs., saw this one, rejected: Bug#77054: wish: show current->upgraded versions on upgrade -u My private solution to this is the following patch to `apt-get': --- algo

Re: our broken man package

2001-01-05 Thread Arthur Korn
Hi Joey Hess schrieb: > > And, anyway, caching might be done in a cronjob: look at the pagesa in This seems to be cr^Hontrary to the idea of caching. > That's a good idea. Another route to take is to split man into the > rendering/caching bit and the command line man page lookup/processing/pager

Re: Need server

2001-01-05 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
Bart Schuller wrote: > download.sourceforge.net Funny: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% host ftp.debian.org ftp.debian.org A 64.28.67.101 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% host download.sourceforge.net download.sourceforge.netA 64.28.67.101 Roland -- Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: BIND 9.X package status

2001-01-05 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:48:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > >> bind9-lib (?) - shared libraries ? these may just end up in > >> package bind9, I'm still working on the details > >> > >> bind9-dev - static libraries and include files > > Josip> Those two should be named libb

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Wichert Akkerman wrote: > You mean the /etc/dpkg/origins/ files? BTW, what is that file doing in /etc if it is not a configuration file? -- see shy jo

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Santiago Vila wrote: > > > * Remove this file altogether, since it serves no useful purpose. > > > > The file does serve a useful purpose: it concentrates the debian version > > number string that is used in a number of places (issue.net and so on) > > into one central place to be modified. > > Wh

Re: BIND 9.X package status

2001-01-05 Thread Brian May
> "Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Josip> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:58:51PM -0700, Bdale Garbee Josip> wrote: >> bind9-lib (?) - shared libraries ? these may just end up in >> package bind9, I'm still working on the details >> >> bind9-dev - static

Upcoming Events in Germany

2001-01-05 Thread Martin Schulze
Hi there, I have received a whole bunch of notifications for conferences and exhibitions in Germany next year. I would love Debian to be present at each of them, with both, a booth and a talk. This should not be too difficult since there are about 70 Developers in Germany with half as much new a

Re: libglide2: debconf didn't ask question even for failed answer

2001-01-05 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joey> Note that I specifically said it should reset the flag *just Joey> before* bombing out. Hmm, why then does the following snippet if [ -f /etc/tripwire/tw.config -o -f /etc/tw.config ] then db_input critical tripwire/upg

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-05 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Tollef" == Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tollef> * Manoj Srivastava >> How do you suggest I reply to sender if someone scribbles all >> over the reply-to header that the sender has set (in case the from >> header is invalid)? Tollef> you use gnus, gnus is able to do this i

Re: BIND 9.X package status

2001-01-05 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:58:51PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > bind9-lib (?) - shared libraries ? these may just > end up in package bind9, I'm still > working on the details > >

Re: Need server

2001-01-05 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > > That's everyone's hoping :) It was down for a few days in the last month, > > even. :( > > Didn't know that. There hasn't been any discussion I've seen. So I wasn't > sure whether it was a local problem. Anyway, is sourceforge not

Re: Postgres 7?

2001-01-05 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20010105T134204-0800, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > The creation of 'testing' has meant that all the packages in woody have > reverted to the versions from potato. Packages from unstable will migrate > to testing once all their dependencies are also in testing. ... and once they have been RC-bugless

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-05 Thread Christian Marillat
"ZK" == Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] ZK> I've just placed there the latest version of avifile ZK> (surprisingly the one in CVS is older) ZK> Anyway for now I've used the name of the tar archive so for ZK> the dpkg this archive looks older (0.53-1) ZK> I'm not sure if I

Re: alert about ncurses maintainer

2001-01-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:02:54PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Package: libncurses5 > Priority: required > Section: base > Installed-Size: 428 > Maintainer: Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Joel's name is in the maintainer field, but notice that the email > address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm told

Re: package pool and big Packages.gz file

2001-01-05 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In 05 Jan 2001 19:51:08 +0100 Goswin Brederlow > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate > scripsit : Hello, >> I'm currently discussing some changes to the rsync client with >> some people from the rsync ML which would unc

Re: Postgres 7?

2001-01-05 Thread Luca Filipozzi
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:31:43PM +0100, Jiri Klouda wrote: > Hi, > why postgres 7 is inaccessible even in Woody? Recently, the Debian package management system has undergone two major changes: 1) the introduction of package pools 2) the introdcution of the 'testing' distribution The current sta

Postgres 7?

2001-01-05 Thread Jiri Klouda
Hi, why postgres 7 is inaccessible even in Woody? Well, actually the files with postgres 7.0.2-3 are all in the /debian/dists/woody/main/binary-i386 subtree, but in the Packages file is following record: Package: postgresql Priority: optional Section: misc Installed-Size: 1948 Maintainer: Oliver

Re: Free replacement for shorten (lossless digital audio compressor)?

2001-01-05 Thread Ingo Saitz
MoiN On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:50:22AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > http://www.softsound.com/Shorten.html > > Does anyone know of a free replacement for the "shorten" tool, from SoftSound? > It is used to compress/decompress digital audio to/from the "shn" format, a > compressed audio format w

ITP loco

2001-01-05 Thread Gergely Risko
Hello! I pacakged up loco, a perl script to colorize the logfiles. It can be found on freshmeat. Gergely Risko

Re: archive.debian.org

2001-01-05 Thread Davide Puricelli
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 09:22:52PM +0100, Davide Puricelli wrote: > > archive.d.o is samosa.d.o, check http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi > > Regards, > -- > Davide Puricelli, [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Debian Developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.debian.org > PGP key: finger [

Re: 2.4.0 kernel and the Toshiba 1715XCDS

2001-01-05 Thread Douglas Bates
Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > so I configure the kernel with cd4281 support. However, the boot > log shows that the cd4281 driver is not being successfully > initialized. Sorry to follow up on my own message but I must have had my fingers on the wrong keys so I mistyped cs4281 as c

Re: archive.debian.org

2001-01-05 Thread Davide Puricelli
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:34:54PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Hi, > what happened to the above machine ? It seems to be unreachble > for a couple of days > > Flo > -- > Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912 > Why is it called "common sense" when

2.4.0 kernel and the Toshiba 1715XCDS

2001-01-05 Thread Douglas Bates
This is not strictly a Debian question but it does relate to a computer running Debian 2.3. The computer is a Toshiba 1715XCDS laptop. I have been using the 2.4.0 testing and prerelease kernels on it and have been very pleased with the support for PCMCIA built into the 2.4.x series kernels. Today

Re: package pool and big Packages.gz file

2001-01-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
In 05 Jan 2001 19:51:08 +0100 Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit : Hello, > I'm currently discussing some changes to the rsync client with some > people from the rsync ML which would uncompress compressed data on the > client side (no changes to the server) and rsync thos

Re: Obsolete software in /usr/local

2001-01-05 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:42PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > Changes in version 1.9.2: > > > > Removed /usr/local/lib from the default /etc/ld.so.conf > > for Debian (Bug#8181). > > oops, except that mod is *ancient*. way before p

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for January 5, 2001

2001-01-05 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:02:40PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:00:08AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote: > >> Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST) > >> > >> Total number of release-critical bugs: 482 > > > >I thought aj i

Re: package pool and big Packages.gz file

2001-01-05 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote: >> If that suits your needs, feel free to write a bugreport on apt >> about this. > Yes, I enjoy closing such bug reports with a terse response. > Hint: Read the bug page for

Re: package pool and big Packages.gz file

2001-01-05 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:05:03AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow > wrote: >> Whats the problem with a big Packages file? >> >> If you don't want to download it again and again just because >> of small changes I have a b

Re: tar -I incompatibility

2001-01-05 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
Goswin Brederlow wrote: > the Author of tar changed the --bzip option again. This time its even > worse than the last time, since -I is still a valid option but with a > totally different meaning. > > This totally changes the behaviour of tar and I would consider that a > critical bug, since backu

Re: our broken man package

2001-01-05 Thread Steve Greenland
On 04-Jan-01, 12:32 (CST), Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > And, anyway, caching might be done in a cronjob: look at the pagesa in > > manpath every night, check which ones have been accessed since the past > > run, and format those. Then delete anything older than

archive.debian.org

2001-01-05 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi, what happened to the above machine ? It seems to be unreachble for a couple of days Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

Re: egcs/gcc?

2001-01-05 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 19:03:45 +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > > - x25tap > > - kerneli crypto patches > > - ReiserFS > In that case ReiserFS is a really bad example, it might never be in 2.2 > and Linus said it will be added in the 2.4 series

Re: egcs/gcc?

2001-01-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > s/gains popularity/offers the functionality that a very large majority of > people rely on in 2.2/. People still rely on 2.0. Not for features, but stability. > For me, 2.4 currently lacks > - x25tap > - kerneli crypto patches > - ReiserFS

Re: egcs/gcc?

2001-01-05 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, Quoting J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > For me, 2.4 currently lacks ;) > - kerneli crypto patches There are preliminary 2.4 kerneli patches available. I will start packaging those as soon as i have the 2.2.18 version cleaned up and up-to-date. Greets, Robert --

Re: Obsolete software in /usr/local

2001-01-05 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:30:58PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > I just finished building a woody system, so I can get my packages up to > date, and all these programs stopped working because the needed library > was not found. If I copy the /usr/local/lib contents to /lib everything > works fine,

Re: egcs/gcc?

2001-01-05 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 17:16:43 +0200, Taneli Vähäkangas wrote: > To me it seems that gcc272 will become obsolete once 2.4 kernel gains > popularity. s/gains popularity/offers the functionality that a very large majority of people rely on in 2.2/. For me, 2.4 currently lacks - x25tap

Re: Obsolete software in /usr/local

2001-01-05 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:42PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote: > Changes in version 1.9.2: > > Removed /usr/local/lib from the default /etc/ld.so.conf > for Debian (Bug#8181). oops, except that mod is *ancient*. way before potato. dunno why this would change between potato and w

Re: package pool and big Packages.gz file

2001-01-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Sami Haahtinen wrote: > this would bring us to, apt renaming the old deb (if there is one) to the > name of the new package and rsync those. and we would save some time once > again... There is a --fuzzy-names patch for rsync that makes rsync do that itself. > Or, can rsync sync binar

Re: Obsolete software in /usr/local

2001-01-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Dale Scheetz wrote: > I just finished building a woody system, so I can get my packages up to > date, and all these programs stopped working because the needed library > was not found. If I copy the /usr/local/lib contents to /lib everything > works fine, suggesting that ldconfig no long

Re: Obsolete software in /usr/local

2001-01-05 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:30:58PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > I run several "ancient" programs, by housing them in /usr/local/bin, with > the libraries they need (which are no longer provided in Debian) situated > in /usr/local/lib. In previous systems, right up to potato, this worked > fine. >

Re: package pool and big Packages.gz file

2001-01-05 Thread Sami Haahtinen
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:46:35AM +0800, zhaoway wrote: > > how about diffs bethween dinstall runs?.. > > sorry, but i don't understand here. dinstall is a server side thing here? yes, when dinstall runs it would copy the old packages file to, lets say, packages.old and create it's changes to th

Obsolete software in /usr/local

2001-01-05 Thread Dale Scheetz
I run several "ancient" programs, by housing them in /usr/local/bin, with the libraries they need (which are no longer provided in Debian) situated in /usr/local/lib. In previous systems, right up to potato, this worked fine. I just finished building a woody system, so I can get my packages up to

Re: Important Note On Source-Only Uploads

2001-01-05 Thread idalton
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:10:53AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote: > * Anthony Towns wrote: > > > Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I > > don't know why. :-/ > > It is what my users learned on some other AIX maschine at my > university. It is the first mailer I le

Re: package pool and big Packages.gz file

2001-01-05 Thread Sami Haahtinen
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:05:03AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Whats the problem with a big Packages file? > > If you don't want to download it again and again just because of small > changes I have a better solution for you: > > rsync > > apt-get update could rsync all Packages files (yes,

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for January 5, 2001

2001-01-05 Thread Colin Watson
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:00:08AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote: >> Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST) >> >> Total number of release-critical bugs: 482 > >I thought aj introduced the "serious" severity so that "important" bugs >wouldn't be consi

Re: rm to mp3, or rm,mp3 to .wav audio files

2001-01-05 Thread Christian Marillat
"UH" == Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: UH> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:59:21PM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote: >> Does anyone have any ideas on >> this, or has it been done already? UH> Hi. UH> I guess vsound is what you're lokking for... UH> Should be listed on Freshmeat... Any idea

tar -I incompatibility

2001-01-05 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Hi, the Author of tar changed the --bzip option again. This time its even worse than the last time, since -I is still a valid option but with a totally different meaning. This totally changes the behaviour of tar and I would consider that a critical bug, since backup software does break horribly

Upstream orphans wmfsm, anybody interested? [Re: wmfsm: homepage and source 404]

2001-01-05 Thread Arthur Korn
Hi I don't know C, thus couldn't do more than keep it available. (quick and dirty translation in []) - Forwarded message from Stefan Eilemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:15:23 +0100 To: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Stefan Eilemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:

Re: package pool and big Packages.gz file

2001-01-05 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On 5 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > If that suits your needs, feel free to write a bugreport on apt about > this. Yes, I enjoy closing such bug reports with a terse response. Hint: Read the bug page for APT to discover why! Jason

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-05 Thread Steve Greenland
On 04-Jan-01, 15:24 (CST), John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4 Jan 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > MS> He may have, as I do, intend to reply to the list, so everyone > MS> can see the conversation. (Quite properly, my MUA ignored the reply > MS> to on a list reply; had I cared to resp

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Vince Mulhollon wrote: > How about creating a directory called "/etc/organizations" including the > following files: You mean the /etc/dpkg/origins/ files? Wichert. -- / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at

Re: Something has broken APT on my system...

2001-01-05 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Heikki Kantola wrote: > For few days (first experienced this on 1.1.) I've been trying to figure > out what's wrong with APT as whatever command I try, I get: Er, ah, er, the only time I've seen that is when someone had too many items in their sources.list, but I did not thin

Re: Need server

2001-01-05 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 06:40:06PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > If you want to see a list of the update timestamps of all known mirrors > look at http://attila.bofh.it/~md/ . Thanks. That helps a lot. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael@Fam-Meskes.De Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linu

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Vince Mulhollon
How about creating a directory called "/etc/organizations" including the following files: /etc/organizations/debian-unstable Contains the text "Debian Unstable http://www.debian.org"; Found in perhaps the unstable version of base files package. /etc/organizations/helixgnome Contains the text "He

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Santiago Vila
Joey Hess wrote: > Santiago Vila wrote: > > * Remove this file altogether, since it serves no useful purpose. > > The file does serve a useful purpose: it concentrates the debian version > number string that is used in a number of places (issue.net and so on) > into one central place to be modified

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for January 5, 2001

2001-01-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Branden Robinson wrote: > I thought aj introduced the "serious" severity so that "important" bugs > wouldn't be considered release-critical anymore, but it looks like bugscan > doesn't know that important bugs aren't RC. Thanks, fixed: @priorities = ("serious", "grave", "critic

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for January 5, 2001

2001-01-05 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:00:08AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote: > Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST) > > Total number of release-critical bugs: 482 I thought aj introduced the "serious" severity so that "important" bugs wouldn't be considered release-critical anymore, but it looks like b

Re: Possible ITP: freebirth

2001-01-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
In Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:41:50 -0500 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit : > Reading this reminded me of Freebirth, which doesn't seem to be packaged yet. > > http://www.bitmechanic.com/projects/freebirth/ > > It seems to be dead upstream, with over a year since the last relea

Re: egcs/gcc?

2001-01-05 Thread Taneli Vähäkangas
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Petr Cech wrote: > i use 2.95.2 and it works. if you want to be really sure, use gcc272 Nonono, if you read Documentation/Changes for 2.4 it actually says that o Gnu C 2.91.66 # gcc --version Please note specifically this part of the same f

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread The Doctor What
* Bart Schuller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010105 07:48]: > I've seen third-party software install scripts use the file to determine > which Linux distribution it's running on. Yes, I think it's important to have one central file that can show (roughly) which version of the OS is running. Being human a

Re: Important Note On Source-Only Uploads

2001-01-05 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 5.01.01 um 10:10:53 schrieb Martin Bialasinski: >> * Anthony Towns wrote: >> > Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I >> > don't know why. :-/ >> [...] >> Pine is extremely easy to use and understand. I don't know any o

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-05 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* David Greene | On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: | | > The problem is L4M3RZ using that broken piece of non-free shit PINE, which | > doesn't appear to respect *any* conventions of netiquette. | | Is there a free mailer to replace "that broken piece of non-free shit | PINE" that sup

Potato depopularisation, wired links

2001-01-05 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Hi, it seems that more and more Packages disapear from potato and are replaced by links into the pools. And thats not new pakages that are becoming stable, but old once getting moved. Did I miss something there? Also a link is placed in /debian/dists/potato/main/source for each package thats now

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-05 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
> > On Friday 05 January 2001 07:29, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above? > > Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the "flags" entry, > > which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for > > it, I reverted to test10. Any

Free replacement for shorten (lossless digital audio compressor)?

2001-01-05 Thread Matt Zimmerman
http://www.softsound.com/Shorten.html Does anyone know of a free replacement for the "shorten" tool, from SoftSound? It is used to compress/decompress digital audio to/from the "shn" format, a compressed audio format which gets about 2:1 lossless compression. It is gaining popularity for lossless

Re: our broken man package

2001-01-05 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
> > There could be a helper setuid program, man-cache-writer. man would call > > this program and pipe it the catpage. man-cache-writer would just write it's > > stding to the proper place. End of the problems. > > No so simple. You don't want the trusted program trusting the output of > a non-tr

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Bart Schuller
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:07:44AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > Screw it, just kill the file. We don't have a mechanism for coping with > it. I've seen third-party software install scripts use the file to determine which Linux distribution it's running on. -- The idea is that the first face sho

Possible ITP: freebirth

2001-01-05 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:04:55AM -0200, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote: > Yes, I've been in a packaging mood lately :) > > I'd like to have Tk707 packaged. Tk707 is a software clone of the > Roland TR-707 rhythm composer, a drum machine. Reading this reminded me of Freebirth, which doesn't seem to

woody and 2.4

2001-01-05 Thread Kenneth Scharf
Just saw this as I suppose many already have http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-01-05-001-04-NW-LF-KN Since Woody is probably still many months away is there a chance that it will include the 2.4 Kernel? = Amateur Radio, when all else fails! http://www.qsl.net/wa2mze Debian Gn

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-05 Thread Brian Almeida
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:29:58AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above? > Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the "flags" entry, > which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for > it, I reverted to test10. Anyone

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Michael Stone
Screw it, just kill the file. We don't have a mechanism for coping with it. -- Mike Stone

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Peter Makholm
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Move it to /var/lib/dpkg Nope, debian_release is independent on the dpkg used. /var/lib/dpkg/ would be a most unintuitive place to place the version of the distribution as a whole.

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-05 Thread Michael Stone
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:33:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > Joey Hess (See Bug#81249) complains about the fact that local changes > to /etc/debian_version are not preserved on upgrades (he wants this > file to read "unstable" instead of the current "testing/unstable"). > > What should I do?

Re: Important Note On Source-Only Uploads

2001-01-05 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 5.01.01 um 10:10:53 schrieb Martin Bialasinski: > * Anthony Towns wrote: > > Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I > > don't know why. :-/ > [...] > Pine is extremely easy to use and understand. I don't know any other > mailer like it. Last time I tried pine mode i

  1   2   >