Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:05:50AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > Martin. Yes. I tried. Do you think I'm a newbie or something? Why > do you think the file is owned by root? It's on windows partition... Hold on ... this is an msdos partition mounted? If so, check out man 8 mount; specificall

Re: Another Grub question/problem

2000-12-27 Thread Brian May
> "Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hamish> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:23:52PM +1100, Brian May wrote: >> still haven't tried 2.2.18. The video= options seems to be >> completely ignored, and Linux boots up as if it wasn't there. Hamish> Did you check /pro

ITP: ttyrec -- a tty recorder

2000-12-27 Thread Takuo KITAME
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist http://www.namazu.org/~satoru/ttyrec/> Description: A tty recorder ttyrec is a tty recorder. A recorded data can be playback with the included ttyplay command. ttyrec is just a derivative of script command for recording timing information with microsecond accur

ITP: fuzz

2000-12-27 Thread Thomas Smith
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist (already submitted to the BTS, is #80263) homepage URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuzz/ d/l URL: http://download.sourceforge.net/fuzz/fuzz-0.6.tar.gz author: Ben Woodard (ben at valinux dot com) Fuzz is a debugging utility that checks for buffer overflows a

Openwall kernel patches

2000-12-27 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Has anyone looked into packaging the Openwall patches for the kernel? Their licensing is kosher. If nobody else steps up, I'll probably do it. -- - mdz

Re: libapache-mod-perl does not activate the module

2000-12-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:02:16AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > depending on libapache-mod-perl is not enough for my new package slash to be > runable on a Debian box, sinde libapache-mod-perl does not > reconfigure/activate the mod_perl Module in postinst. > > Am I allowed to chec

Re: Rambling apt-get ideas

2000-12-27 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:03:14PM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote: > How about an "apt-getd" debian daemon. > > Use a apt-get client to remotely mess with another workstations packages. > Messing with only one workstation at a time is boring. How about multicast > to configure a hundred workstatio

libapache-mod-perl does not activate the module

2000-12-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, depending on libapache-mod-perl is not enough for my new package slash to be runable on a Debian box, sinde libapache-mod-perl does not reconfigure/activate the mod_perl Module in postinst. Am I allowed to check for the comemnted mod_perl line in apache's config and offer the option to ac

Re: List of packages that could be dropped

2000-12-27 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 04:26:57PM -0700, John Galt wrote: > > 195 days is a lot of time to have an important package orphaned. At 6 or > so months of "orphaned-ness", if a maintainer is not found, one should and > IMHO must look at the very real at that point possibility of going on > without it

Re: booting Linux 2.2.18 NFS-Root

2000-12-27 Thread Brian May
> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Branden> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:58:47PM +1100, Brian May Branden> wrote: >> I seem to have problems booting Linux 2.2.18 via NFS root >> image. **2.2.17 works fine**, but 2.2.18 says "No NFS servers >> availabl

Intent to Orphan: fakebo

2000-12-27 Thread Gregory T. Norris
For reasons ranging from (lack of) time to obsolescence, I'm hereby orphaning fakebo. If anyone likes it well enough to take it over, speak up now. If no one steps forward in the near future, I'm going to officially request it's removal, as it has a security bug filed against it (#76314). It doe

(a small correction) Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
"Eray Ozkural (exa)" wrote: > > Try to reproduce what I do there. The permissions on parent > are irrelevant. That's a vfat filesystem. Permissions are > same everywhere anyway if you wonder. Sorry sorry sorry sorry. Permissions on parent of course do matter as you express. However, in this case

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Jason Henry Parker wrote: > At a guess, I would say this is a non-bug. I'm saying that I can't rename a file using gmc which I *can* otherwise rename. So your first guess in not very accurate. You know how to rename something in gmc, yes? You do that in the properties of a file, by editing the na

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Jason Henry Parker
"Eray Ozkural (exa)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Check it out for yourself: > > orion:Stuff$ ls -ald desktop.* > -rwxrwxr-x1 root windows 125 Nov 20 1998 desktop.ini > orion:Stuff$ mv desktop.ini desktop.what! > orion:Stuff$ ls -ald desktop.* > -rwxrwxr-x1 root windows

Re: List of packages that could be dropped

2000-12-27 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Christian Kurz wrote: > |dpkg-scriptlib -- dpkg-perl and dpkg-python (142 days old) > > Is any package using functions of dpkg-perl or dpkg-python? If yes, I > think someone should take care of this packages and the bugs that are in > them. If not, could we move this packages from our

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Hi Martin, cross-posting to debian-devel because your assessment of the bug is totally wrong. Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > Hi, > > > I can rename a directory to which I have permissions in shell > > > orion:mp3$ ls -ald Rob\ Zombie/ > > drwxrwxr-x2 root windows 16384 May 21 2000

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
So, it seems that I will maintain catdoc, not you? Am I right? Thanks, NIDD -- The Debian Project. Debian [EMAIL PR

Re: Another Grub question/problem

2000-12-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:23:52PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > still haven't tried 2.2.18. The video= options seems to be completely > ignored, and Linux boots up as if it wasn't there. Did you check /proc/cmdline to see if grub actually passed it to the kernel? Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[E

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 01:03:03AM +, Mark Seaborn wrote: > Of course. I know this. It is repeated many times on this mailing > list. But it does not have to be so. Why should upgrading package X > affect unrelated package Y? If one user wants to use packages from Package X and package Y

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:30:13PM +1030, Matthew Tuck wrote: > - if my apt download was terminated halfway through and I have no > internet time left, I would still get to install my fully downloaded > packages without messing around with dpkg and trying to work out the > dependencies manually ap

Re: List of packages that could be dropped

2000-12-27 Thread John Galt
195 days is a lot of time to have an important package orphaned. At 6 or so months of "orphaned-ness", if a maintainer is not found, one should and IMHO must look at the very real at that point possibility of going on without it. If this necessitates further changes as in removal of an entire ar

ITP: libcrypt-ssleay-perl

2000-12-27 Thread Jason Henry Parker
[This message has been submitted as a wishlist bug against wnpp; the bug number is 80584.] Crypt::SSLeay allows LWP::UserAgent objects (among others) to correctly perform GET and POST operations over HTTPS. Since it uses SSL, the package will depend on libssl095a (and build-depend on the appropri

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-27 Thread John Galt
Isn't there rudimentary ACL implementation in the kernel? An ACL would do the job nicely... On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > Peter Eckersley wrote: > > > > > > If my I want a file to be readable by everybody *except* user fred, I > > can set permissions: > > > > [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Sam TH
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 10:47:17PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 11:18:54AM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > just wanted to point to wv which seems to do a much better > > > job than catdoc, and also o

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Dr. Guenter Bechly
msg.pgp Description: PGP message

RE: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-27 Thread Matthew Reynolds
Sorry if I'm a bit late to the party, but I'm going to look into doing something similiar to what Dwayne's doing, with a heavy Java slant. Anyway, I wrote up a wishlist of sorts here : http://www.devel.e-plagiarism.com/~entropy/proposals/jam.html The ideas seem sound, but I haven't had too many p

Re: List of packages that could be dropped

2000-12-27 Thread Tamas TEVESZ
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, [iso-8859-1] Petr Čech wrote: > > |mhash (235 days old) > No. I'm not sure if gorgo orphaned it or not. php4 builds an extension with he says, `i think i did... about the time when i orphaned php' -- [-] ``And there are plenty of other innovative pieces of software such

Re: Feature Request: BTS

2000-12-27 Thread Adam Heath
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Toni Mueller wrote: > > Hello, > > I'd like to have a feature in the BTS. That's the ability to select a > minimum (maximum?) version of a given package to search for. Should > shorten the sometimes rather longish lists of bug reports (and thereby > helping to read them fast

Feature Request: BTS

2000-12-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, I'd like to have a feature in the BTS. That's the ability to select a minimum (maximum?) version of a given package to search for. Should shorten the sometimes rather longish lists of bug reports (and thereby helping to read them faster and closer, too. I may volunteer to do it, but would

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
++ 28/12/00 00:51 +0300 - Peter Novodvorsky: > ++ 27/12/00 16:03 +0100 - Dr. Guenter Bechly: > > Oops, I already adopted the package on 24th Dec. Sorry, but I did not know > > that anybody else was interested in adopting it. It had announced my ITA a > > day before. > > I have upload catdoc only k

Re: List of packages that could be dropped

2000-12-27 Thread Petr Èech
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:22:21PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > > Hi, > |mhash (235 days old) > > Has this package been dropped from unstable? If yes, can we close the > wnpp-bug about it? No. I'm not sure if gorgo orphaned it or not. php4 builds an extension with this library. Dunno, how

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
++ 27/12/00 16:03 +0100 - Dr. Guenter Bechly: > Oops, I already adopted the package on 24th Dec. Sorry, but I did not know > that anybody else was interested in adopting it. It had announced my ITA a > day before. I have upload catdoc only know and closed the bug. sorry.

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 11:18:54AM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > just wanted to point to wv which seems to do a much better > > job than catdoc, and also operates from a script if desired. > > Apparently only the GUI is "missing".

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-27 Thread Mark Seaborn
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 08:41:43PM +, Mark Seaborn wrote: > > I want a system where I can install multiple versions of a library > > (or any package really) and say which version I want each program > > on the system to use, possibly on a per-user b

Re: Another Grub question/problem

2000-12-27 Thread Malcolm Parsons
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:23:52PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > At the moment I have: > > kernel (hd0,0)/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.17 root=/dev/hda1 video=0x319 try: kernel (hd0,0)/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.17 root=/dev/hda1 video=vesa:0x319

Rambling apt-get ideas

2000-12-27 Thread Vince Mulhollon
How about an "apt-getd" debian daemon. Use a apt-get client to remotely mess with another workstations packages. Messing with only one workstation at a time is boring. How about multicast to configure a hundred workstations instead, all at once? And then have a proxying apt-getd server multicas

Re: booting Linux NFS-Root

2000-12-27 Thread Matt Zimmerman
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:58:47PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > > I seem to have problems booting Linux 2.2.18 via NFS root > > image. **2.2.17 works fine**, but 2.2.18 says "No NFS servers > > available, giving up". > [...] > > Any ideas what is going on? What kernel rev and NFS version are the NF

Re: How to get changelog file for a given _binary_ package?

2000-12-27 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +, Marc Haber wrote: > I would like to do this by periodically pulling the change logs for > all packages that we have backported from the Debian web page > (http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/get-changelog?package=$package) and > then comparing the version number

Nice features in a pre package manager

2000-12-27 Thread Alex Perry
In addition to the previously-mentioned pipelining that installs packages as soon as they're downloaded, so their deb can be deleted, and has careful sequencing so that a package is not downloaded until its dependencies have _already_ been met, it would be nice ... to have the package requesting f

Re: netsacape running wild

2000-12-27 Thread Frank Belew
On 11 Dec 2000 20:18:58 -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:40:56AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > apart from that, mozilla's great. much better, faster, more stable than > > netscape. still crashes occasionaly, but that's acceptable for a beta > > program. > > Has anyone h

Re: testing "testing" (was: Implementing "testing")

2000-12-27 Thread Thomas
Ola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote "The big problem is as I see it, to implement it. I'm not familiar with the background work that the server do so I'm not the right person ot do it, I think. Are you willing to implement such a system?" I will try some experimentation on a local system, and see if I

Re: booting Linux NFS-Root

2000-12-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:58:47PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > I seem to have problems booting Linux 2.2.18 via NFS root > image. **2.2.17 works fine**, but 2.2.18 says "No NFS servers > available, giving up". [...] > Any ideas what is going on? This may not have anything to do with it, but IIRC, Al

Re: looking for replacement for run (because of critical bug in

2000-12-27 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 11:26:25AM +, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2000 07:28:59 -0500, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >It sounds pretty easy to implement; just stat() and compare the inode number. > > That won't catch a file being copied and truncated since the inode > s

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-27 Thread Stephen Zander
> "exa" == exa writes: exa> I use bash. Is this zsh better? :) Yes. -- Stephen "A duck!"

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Sam TH
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > Hello, > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:10:19AM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > > ++ 20/12/00 12:52 -0700 - Bdale Garbee: > > > I am no longer interested in maintaining the 'catdoc' package. However, I > > > will continue my cu

Linux Expo in Praha, Budabest, Warsaw & Moscow (was: Linux Expo Road Show)

2000-12-27 Thread Martin Schulze
I'd like to send out a reminder. Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > Hello! > > I want you to know, that Sky Events will hold four conferences and > exhibition in eastern europe called Linux Expo Road Show. Conferences > will be held in Praha, Budapest, Warsaw and Moscow, and exhibition -- > only in Mosco

Re: dpkg-scanpackage is ignoring newwe?

2000-12-27 Thread Martin Schulze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > running dpkg-scanpackage i386 over > Packages > > > > > i get (over is size 0) > > > > > ! Package msn-transport (filename i386/msn-transport_1.0-2_i386.deb) is > > > re

Re: How to get changelog file for a given _binary_ package?

2000-12-27 Thread Rick Younie
Marc Haber wrote: > Hi, > > we use a number of backported potato packages and I am working on a > script that sends me e-mail when a new version of these packages > appears in woody. > > I would like to do this by periodically pulling the change logs for > all packages that we have backported fro

Re: X 4 and app-defaults

2000-12-27 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:27:43 +0100, on Re: X 4 and app-defaults, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what about localisation of app-default, I see XEarth ships with > > # ls /etc/X11/*/app-defaults/XEarth > /etc/X11/ja_JP.eucJP/app-defaults/XEarth > /e

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-27 Thread The Doctor What
* Dwayne C . Litzenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001223 22:47]: > Hello! > > I'm starting work on a new linux package manager. The idea is to be able to > replace rpm, dpkg, apt, dselect (backend) with one,written mostly from scratch > and designed to be as simple (code, not features) and clean as

Re: How to get changelog file for a given _binary_ package?

2000-12-27 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 10:37:17 -0500, Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >apt-cache show $package|grep Source in a perl script, ugly. But a possible way to do it. >Then use that value in the url (in this case db) http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/get-changelog?package=db "No such changelog". Mi

Re: How to get changelog file for a given _binary_ package?

2000-12-27 Thread Brian Almeida
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi, > > we use a number of backported potato packages and I am working on a > script that sends me e-mail when a new version of these packages > appears in woody. > > I would like to do this by periodically pulling the change logs for

How to get changelog file for a given _binary_ package?

2000-12-27 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, we use a number of backported potato packages and I am working on a script that sends me e-mail when a new version of these packages appears in woody. I would like to do this by periodically pulling the change logs for all packages that we have backported from the Debian web page (http://cgi.

RFC: Changing the Packages files

2000-12-27 Thread Otto Wyss
With the introduction of the packages pool, I'm going to propose the following change to the Packages files: 1. The filename tells what the Packages files contains: Packages files should be independent of the their location, therefor the name has to reflect their contents, i.e. "Packages-$

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Dr. Guenter Bechly
Hi, > > > I am no longer interested in maintaining the 'catdoc' package. However, I > > > will continue my current level of inactive ownership of the package until > > > such time as someone takes it over. > > I'd like to adopt this package. Oops, I already adopted the package on 24th Dec. Sorry

Re: gtk-doc vs glib1.2-dev info file conflict

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Teichman
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:19:11PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > I have the helix version installed: > (Also this version should replace libgtk-doc, shouldn't it?) Whenever any helix packages are involved, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the appropriate place to report problems. Not debian-devel. > #dpkg

Re: List of packages that could be dropped

2000-12-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
In Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:42:49 +0100 Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit : > > silo (0.9.9-1) unstable; urgency=low > > > * New upstream > > * Took over silo's packaging > > > -- Erick Kinnee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 4 Sep 2000 10:54:23 -0500 > > > Which I assumed mea

Re: BTS spam( Re: Boost Windows Reliability!!!!!)

2000-12-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
In Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:19:19 +0100 Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit : > > I've seen one in lyx-cjk bugs. It's cosmetically annoying. > > I really would love to remove it but there would be quite a lot of > > trouble (and fear that legitimate info could be lost). > > Tell me

Re: gtk-doc vs glib1.2-dev info file conflict

2000-12-27 Thread Svante Signell
I have the helix version installed: (Also this version should replace libgtk-doc, shouldn't it?) #dpkg -s libglib1.2-dev Package: libglib1.2-dev Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: devel Installed-Size: 367 Maintainer: Helix Code, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source: glib1.2 Vers

Re: List of packages that could be dropped

2000-12-27 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 07:06:30PM -0700, John Galt wrote: > > If it's so important, why is it orphaned? I'm thinking that if the SPARC > folx can't be bothered to maintain their bootloader, perhaps the port's > utilization of resources needs to be called into question... What's the > point in D

Re: Grub question/problem

2000-12-27 Thread Michael Meskes
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 10:03:30PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote: > Hm, have you tried running grub-install --recheck and then Won't run: feivel:~# grub-install --recheck install_device not specified. Usage: grub-install [OPTION] install_device Install GRUB on your drive. -h, --help

Re: X 4 and app-defaults

2000-12-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:50:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Oh, they generally get filed, it's just that some package maintainers don't > do a damn thing about them[1]. what about localisation of app-default, I see XEarth ships with # ls /etc/X11/*/app-defaults/XEarth /etc/X11/ja_JP.eucJP

Re: ITO: catdoc

2000-12-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:10:19AM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > ++ 20/12/00 12:52 -0700 - Bdale Garbee: > > I am no longer interested in maintaining the 'catdoc' package. However, I > > will continue my current level of inactive ownership of the package until > > such time as someon

Re: looking for replacement for run (because of critical bug in

2000-12-27 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000 07:28:59 -0500, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It sounds pretty easy to implement; just stat() and compare the inode number. That won't catch a file being copied and truncated since the inode stays the same. Greetings Marc -- -

Re: List of packages that could be dropped

2000-12-27 Thread Christian Kurz
On 00-12-27 Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 06:59:16PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:22:21PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > > > > |silo (195 days old) > > > > > > Has this package been removed from unstable and if yes, why? It's > > > currently st

Re: List of packages that could be dropped

2000-12-27 Thread Christian Kurz
On 00-12-26 Ben Collins wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:22:21PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > > |silo (195 days old) > > > > Has this package been removed from unstable and if yes, why? It's > > currently still listed in the wnpp but I could find it which apt-cache > > search silo. > Yo

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:14:54PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > This is a big nuisance. I spent months working on a project with > > a shared directory without individual user groups. Worse yet, you > > can end up with a CVS repository full of files with user-only >

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > This is a big nuisance. I spent months working on a project with > a shared directory without individual user groups. Worse yet, you > can end up with a CVS repository full of files with user-only > permissions (using a local CVS repositor, rather than remote). > Ok. Th

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-27 Thread Richard Atterer
Just one simple small thing for me, please: An installer that is smart enough to realize that it is about to overflow the disc, so it deletes any .deb files that have been downloaded and already installed. (This bit me once while doing an install over PPP.) Cheers, Richard -- __ _ |_) /

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Peter Eckersley wrote: > > > If my I want a file to be readable by everybody *except* user fred, I > can set permissions: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l plot-against-fred > -rwr--1 pde fred 1 Dec 27 17:12 plot-against-fred > > Of course, I need root access to do it :(

Re: perl 5.00{5,4} dependancies

2000-12-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:24:34AM -0800, Joey Hess écrivait: > liblocale-gettext-perl > libmldbm-perl > dpkg-ftp Those 3 are mine. I've just done it. No need to file a bug. > perl-5.005-suid This one should not be updated :) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.lin

Re: dueling banjos

2000-12-27 Thread Joseph Carter
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:31:48PM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote: > I just did a Google search on "duelling banjos debian" and came up with > nothing -- just two hits to our archives from the "dualling banjos" thread > that happened one of the previous times we got this strange request. I don't know

Re: perl 5.00{5,4} dependancies

2000-12-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:26:07PM -, Moshe Zadka wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm not sure that solves all the problems - I'd like apache-perl > > recompiled against perl5.6, and so the rest of modules. > > I would do, but I'm not at all sur

Re: perl 5.00{5,4} dependancies

2000-12-27 Thread Joey Hess
Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > First we need to solve the IMHO broken Alternatives Settings of those Perl > Packages. They messed up my System more than one. See the BTS, there are patches (#80143). Someone should NMU it, it's absurd it's been left so broken for so long. > perl-5.6-base is removing > a

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Eckersley
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:43:53AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > > > I like using groups to give different sets of rights and I'm > > > annoyed by Debian giving every user his own group. Is tha