On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 02:21:51PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> > If I had to change something in the Debian package manager, I would
> > like it to use bzip2 instead of gzip, but this doesn't need a
> > omplete reimplementation. T
"Dwayne C . Litzenberger" wrote:
> I wrote..
> >
> > It should be re-usable as a library for implementing packages/modules
> > for PLs·
>
> Erm, now I'm getting confused. I assume you mean that this package manager
> should also be a framework for loadable modules. Isn't that way outsi
Answering my own question. Needed to install:
libtool, libltdl0, libltdl0-dev, libproplist0-dev
(maybe a little overdone).
Cheers,
Cristian
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>
> I'm now getting regular X freezes. Only thing I can pick up is:
>
> /usr/bin/X11/WindowMaker f
> open up a co-ordination page on sourceforge and start a public design
> process. do not stick to a religious idea like "it should be written
> in C, or in perl".
I don't know. I've seem a number of projects fail because they spent too much
time on discussion and didn't ever get down to business
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:44:13AM -0500, Adam Lazur wrote:
> Dwayne C . Litzenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
>
> Relocatable packages so a user can do an individual package install into ~
> without being r00t (this may be possibl
I'm now getting regular X freezes. Only thing I can pick up is:
/usr/bin/X11/WindowMaker fatal error: got signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
from ~/.xsession-errors.
Trying to rebuild an unstripped wmaker from source, but automake makes
my life miserable:
aclocal
aclocal: configure.in: 15: macro `
On 12/24/2000 13:13, Mark Brown at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Spam to the Debian mailing lists tends to be especially annoying since
> the spammers always seem to hit each and every mailing list (or at
> least, a large number of them), which makes each spam much more
> noticable.
The GIMP-user an
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 10:38:50PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Oh yeah. If only there was some way of automatic killing of such spams, sent
> to more than X (say, 5) mailing lists... something that would remember the
> last X-1 mails from the same domain name (or whatever) and kill off the
> remai
Today, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously John Hasler wrote:
>> Undo.
> dpkg will support rollback at some point, when reiserfs supports
> transactions.
Even then, I imagine it to be difficult. What about installs that cross
filesystem boundaries, etc. Either you'd have to h
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:13:36PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> Spam to the Debian mailing lists tends to be especially annoying since
> the spammers always seem to hit each and every mailing list (or at
> least, a large number of them), which makes each spam much more
> noticable.
Oh yeah. If only
Your message dated Sun, 24 Dec 2000 22:12:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#80433: test, ignore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
On Dec 24, Tomasz Barszczak wrote:
> Package: general
> Version: N/A; reported 2000-12-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This is only a test, should not be sent to debian.
> I used reportbug --email=ADDRESS.
> I apilogize if the --email didn't prevent it from being mailed out
> to debian.
--email chang
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 05:53:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> It has been said in a related thread on a mailing list that shall not be
> named :) that making a DNS lookup for hosts carrying the blacklists on each
> delivery would slow it down. It has also been said that this isn't hard to
> work
Hi Tomasz!
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Tomasz Barszczak wrote:
> Package: general
> Version: N/A; reported 2000-12-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This is only a test, should not be sent to debian.
Didn't work, it went to Debian all way through.
Merry Xmas!
yours,
Your message dated Sun, 24 Dec 2000 14:53:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#80434: sndconfig
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> Joseph Carter wrote:
> >
> > I think if dpkg used some sort of hashed database index it would be a hell
> > of a lot nicer to people's CPUs and memory. Whether or not that requires
> > a re-implemenetation of dpkg or not isn't for me to say since
Package: general
Severity: normal
Version:
Synopsis: sndconfig
Class:sw-bug
Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 7.0 (Guinness)
System: Linux 2.2.16-22 i586 unknown
Description:
I used sndconfig to configure my Sound Blaster 16 pnp sound card. The
tests worked fine, but when I try to play
Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2000-12-24
Severity: wishlist
This is only a test, should not be sent to debian.
I used reportbug --email=ADDRESS.
I apilogize if the --email didn't prevent it from being mailed out to debian.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Ker
Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> I think if dpkg used some sort of hashed database index it would be a hell
> of a lot nicer to people's CPUs and memory. Whether or not that requires
> a re-implemenetation of dpkg or not isn't for me to say since I haven't
> looked at dpkg's code in 3 years.
That smells
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> If I had to change something in the Debian package manager, I would
> like it to use bzip2 instead of gzip, but this doesn't need a
> omplete reimplementation. The problem isn't technical, but it's been
> debated many times. I don'
Federico Di Gregorio writes:
> or am i missing something?
In addition to the things Ben mentioned, dependencies and broken
installs.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 10:18:55AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> >
> > Now maybe if we were using the RBL, DUL, and RSS lists... :-)
> >
>
> GNU mailing lists (supposedly) use RBL, but in a mode where `spam' isn't
> deleted, but rather just gets a header added saying `this message is
> considered
Dwayne C . Litzenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
Relocatable packages so a user can do an individual package install into ~
without being r00t (this may be possible now with some dpkg foo?).
The ability to install more than one vers
Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> less has a mode to select() and watch the end of a file, invoked with
> the 'F' command. I don't think that it's currently possible for less to
> enter this mode with a command-line flag, but I've often wished that it did,
> so maybe this feature should b
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 04:10:43PM +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Ben Collins's letter:
> > On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 03:50:41PM +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> > > Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Wichert Akkerman's letter:
> > > > Previously John
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Ben Collins's letter:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 03:50:41PM +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> > Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Wichert Akkerman's letter:
> > > Previously John Hasler wrote:
> > > > Undo.
> > >
> > > dpkg will support rollback at some po
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 03:50:41PM +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Wichert Akkerman's letter:
> > Previously John Hasler wrote:
> > > Undo.
> >
> > dpkg will support rollback at some point, when reiserfs supports
> > transactions.
>
> that's completely c
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Wichert Akkerman's letter:
> Previously John Hasler wrote:
> > Undo.
>
> dpkg will support rollback at some point, when reiserfs supports
> transactions.
that's completely crazy. will you force anybody who wants rollback to
use raiserfs? generic applications
Previously John Hasler wrote:
> Undo.
dpkg will support rollback at some point, when reiserfs supports
transactions.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Dwayne C . Litzenberger" wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm starting work on a new linux package manager. The idea is to be able to
> replace rpm, dpkg, apt, dselect (backend) with one,written mostly from scratch
> and designed to be as simple (code, not features) and clean as possible. For
> now, the wo
Dwayne C. Litzenberger writes:
> So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
Undo.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
"Dwayne C . Litzenberger" wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm starting work on a new linux package manager. The idea is to be able to
> replace rpm, dpkg, apt, dselect (backend) with one,written mostly from scratch
> and designed to be as simple (code, not features) and clean as possible. For
> now, the
hi *,
after being asked so by the upstream author i declare my intention
to orphan (from now) the following packages:
python-popy
zope-popyda
merry xmas,
federico
--
Federico Di Gregorio
MIXAD LIVE Chief of Research & Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 08:43:51PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> I have a comment: NO WAY IN HELL. The day that we start rejecting DUL
> posts is the day that several people leave the project, me included. How
> many ISPs these days route mail worth a damn?
:-) Joseph you make it too easy.
You
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 12:10:29PM +0200, Gil Bahat wrote:
> Here is a (somewhat?) constructive idea regarding the spam.
> i would like to point everyone to sugarplum:
> (http://www.devin.com/sugarplum/)
> quote from README file:
Cool program! Might be a good way to discourage spammers
from harves
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:04:10AM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> > However, I would say that if the program dies so frequently that it needs a
> > wrapper like this, it should probably be fixed.
>
> tail -f of a logfile into a secured less. To search and scroll
> backwards, one must kill the tail
hello,I would like to adopt the package
gdict and maintain it. Would you guys ther like to give me some pointers on how
should i do? I'm not a debian developer yet, but i have intention to be (and am
appling).regards,Related Links:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=80
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I intend to package mifluz.
Package: mifluz
License: GPL
URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/mifluz/
Description:
- ---
The purpose of mifluz is to provide a C++ library to build and query a full
text i
Здравствуйте!
Прошу прощения за то, что вторгаюсь в Ваше пространство:)
Я хочу поделиться с Вами превосходной возможностью начать
собственный бизнес в Интернет и зарабатывать от $50 до
1000$/мес. При этом от Вас потребуется только 3-4 часа времени
в день, подключение к интернет
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Josh Huber wrote:
> built. Should I just do it myself? I also know that there's no
> (automated :) autobuilder for Alpha, so I understand that there might
> be some delay for alpha.
In Alpha's case, I'm normally very "on-top" of the builds, but am going to
be slow for the
> Here is a (somewhat?) constructive idea regarding the spam.
> i would like to point everyone to sugarplum:
> (http://www.devin.com/sugarplum/)
> quote from README file:
> [snip]ac
I'd suggest putting a lot of IFRAME tag which include the document generated
by sugerplum which occuplies only a min
Here is a (somewhat?) constructive idea regarding the spam.
i would like to point everyone to sugarplum:
(http://www.devin.com/sugarplum/)
quote from README file:
sugarplum is a spam-bot database poisoner utility. The
specific usage of a spam poisoner is to provide a spammer's email
spider with b
On 2000-12-23, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes and no. It can daemonize a program, but will not restart it when it dies.
> It sounds like what you want is a simple shell script that would be daemonized
> by start-stop-daemon:
>
> /usr/sbin/myprogram.wrapper:
>
> However, I would
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:18:09AM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
> "Dwayne C . Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
>
> I agree with Ethan. Start explaining why you want to reinvent the
> wheel then we maybe has some ideas fo
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> > > So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
> >
> > I agree with Ethan. Start explaining why you want to reinvent the
> > wheel then we maybe has some ideas for things to do when you
> > reinventin
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the debian packaging system answered most things i want from a
> packaging system. what exactly is missing/wrong with the debian
> packaging system that makes you feel the need for wheel reinvention?
I also cannot see anything wrong with the Debian packag
Hi guys,
> > So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
>
> I agree with Ethan. Start explaining why you want to reinvent the
> wheel then we maybe has some ideas for things to do when you
> reinventing for other reasons.
If I had to change something in the Debian package mana
"Dwayne C . Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my question is: What do you wish for in a package manager?
I agree with Ethan. Start explaining why you want to reinvent the
wheel then we maybe has some ideas for things to do when you
reinventing for other reasons.
The only feature I'v
48 matches
Mail list logo
