On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 10:17:32PM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
> > I Intend To Package the Hotline client, 'fidelio'.
>
> yes thats a good idea, i already compiled it cleanly on my potato box so you
> wont have much problems.. are u going to include some
> Do we need to start collecting a database of what combinations of
> configurations work in which situations?
iMac + logitech usb wheel mouse:
XFree86 3.3.x:
Protocol "imps/2"
Device "/dev/usbmouse"
works fine - including mouse wheel.
Protocol"mousesystems"
Dev
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:26:53PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> That to me says Debian has permission to re-distribute our modified
> version, but that people who recieve it from us do not, unless they
> too ask permission ("We do expect and appreciate..."). Non-free. If
> she had written just "
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
> I had the same problems when using the new defaults (-R ms3 and Intellimouse
> on /dev/gpmdata).
> 2)use the default gpm repeater type (msc). It is compatible with
> the old behavior of slink and gpm, and works without problems.
> T
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> A gutenberg index and retrieval program, OTOH...
> (mental note: must write this)
A search on freshmeat reveals a neat program called gutenbook.
Its in perl, and uses perl-gtk.
It does indexing and retrieving, and although still in b
>
> Hi!
>
> In the recent past, there have been multiple (bug) reports about the behaviour
> of potato (& woody?) gpm in the presence of X (or vice versa, really). I've
> done some research, with these results:
>
> 1. On slink and probably before (because I don't remember things being
>diff
Previously Gerhard Poul wrote:
> Was there already a discussion about a x86-64 (64-bit AMDs) port on
> this list?
Somewhat. We've talked with AMD about getting resources for the port.
There is a group of people doing the ABI, toolchain and kernel work
already, see http://www.x86-64.org/ .
> What
Was there already a discussion about a x86-64 (64-bit AMDs) port on
this list?
I haven't found anything and I would like to get some opinions.
What do you think? - Is it worth/needed to make this a port with it's
own port information page and mailing list?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> A gutenberg index and retrieval program, OTOH...
> (mental note: must write this)
Have a look at www.gutenbook.org
Cheers,
Chris
--
pick, pack, pock, puck: like drops of water in a fountain falling
softly in the brimming bowl.
Today, Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
>> I was wondering that the work done by Project Gutenberg
>> (http://sailor.gutenberg.org) should be made available through debian.
> This came already to discussion some months ago when someone proposed to
> package the con
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> c) *eventually* there will be a debconf server(right word?) which network
> admins can install. This will have the answers stored in it and then when
> boxes need to know an asnwer, they query debconf and it queries the server.
> This way, you can
Followup to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert D. Hilliard)
Date: 02 Sep 2000 11:00:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:32:08 +0530
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 55
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
[EMAI
> Is it possible to play the game without the music? If so you might
> consider placing it in main with a Recommends: or Suggests: for
> the non-free music.
>
I read in the policy:
In addition, the packages in "main"
* must not require a package outside of "main" for compilation or
Hi Ethan!
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 01:25:09AM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > >
> > > my home directory is mode 710 and ssh works fine, on other systems my
> > > home is mode 755 and ssh still works fine (all with RSA auth and
> > > StrictModes yes)
> >
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 02:32:08PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was wondering that the work done by Project Gutenberg
> (http://sailor.gutenberg.org) should be made available through debian.
>
> It would be great to use 'apt' to get all the great work done there.
>
> It shouldn't be difficul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
> I was wondering that the work done by Project Gutenberg
> (http://sailor.gutenberg.org) should be made available through debian.
This came already to discussion some months ago when someone proposed to
package the constitution of Finland.
The point is that packaging all
Hello,
I was wondering that the work done by Project Gutenberg
(http://sailor.gutenberg.org) should be made available through debian.
It would be great to use 'apt' to get all the great work done there.
It shouldn't be difficult at all to package. I don't know if this has been
discussed earlier
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> While we are at it. Kurt critizes that adduser creates home
> directories readable for all users by default. The woody version has
> an option in /etc/adduser.conf to change it to any value you
> want. Shall we make something like 700 default?
I
Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:10:30PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
>> As I said above, debconf is in standard.
> Sorry. I didn't know that. Dpkg and apt-cache still claim that it is
> in optional:
Someone needs to update the override file for debconf to be
package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Hlins is a tool to insert hypertext links into HTML documents,
using a database with entries of the form "name = url". It is
designed for inserting urls of real persons: it knows about
abbreviations of first and middle names and tolerates dropping
the secon
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:06:16AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > 751 seems more reasonable IMO.
> >
> > This sounds also reasonable for me. And because of the x-bit UserDirs,
> > etc. should work. Does anyone objects if I change this with the next
> > upload of adduser? Consider that this is
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 01:25:09AM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote:
> >
> > my home directory is mode 710 and ssh works fine, on other systems my
> > home is mode 755 and ssh still works fine (all with RSA auth and
> > StrictModes yes)
>
> Actually, sshd only cares about ~/.ssh and ~/.ssh/authorized_ke
On 1 Sep 2000, Alex Romosan wrote:
> with 'apt-get source -b '. what's the point in having the
> ability to download the source and recompile it automatically if the
> next upgrade will wipe it out. if i choose to recompile a package, apt
Mostly to compile versions that are not available for 'st
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:31:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > [Alex Romosan wrote:]
> > > which are not on by default and then i have to put the packages on
> > > hold because apt wants to get the remote ones.
> >
> > You have to do this anyhow, o
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:31:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> [Alex Romosan wrote:]
> > which are not on by default and then i have to put the packages on
> > hold because apt wants to get the remote ones.
>
> You have to do this anyhow, otherwise the package will get upgraded
> and you will l
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> Is there a convenient way to put a package on hold? I couldn't
> figure anything out form the dpkg and apt-get manpages. If I
> have to start dselect every time I want to put something on hold
> this is certainly not how it should be. (
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 12:04:20PM -0400, Robert D. Hilliard wrote:
> Despite the disclaimer about error checking, I have had good
> results with it.
just paranoia. i've never had a problem with it. the message is there
mostly to let people know that it's the kind of tool which makes it real
eas
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 09:03:10PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:06:20PM -0400, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> >
> > Anything less than 700 breaks RSA authentication for ssh. A point to
> > consider though I'll gladly concede that anyone using RSA keys ought
> > to know wha
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:06:20PM -0400, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
>
> Anything less than 700 breaks RSA authentication for ssh. A point to
> consider though I'll gladly concede that anyone using RSA keys ought
> to know what permissions they want on their home directory and how to
> change them
I intend to package Hanzi Master, a Chinese character dictionary and
learning aid. I haven't yet passed the NM process; however Anthony
Fok ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has agreed to sponsor this package for me.
License: GPL
URL: http://cogsci.ucsd.edu/~arobert/hanzim.html
It builds fairly cleanly on my
hi
It's really a nice tool.:-)
And it could be installed from linux !
saka
-Original Message-
From: hashao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 11:00 AM
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: CFP: Smart
Hello debian-devel,
Smart BootManager is a tiny, powerful and multi-language boot manager
written in assembler. SBM supports many features in only 30K bytes
including multi-languages and themes, a user friendly menu system,
partition auto scan, boot schedule, password protection, and more. SBM
is
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:10:30PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> As I said above, debconf is in standard.
Sorry. I didn't know that. Dpkg and apt-cache still claim that it is
in optional:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% apt-cache show debconf | grep \^Priority:
Priority: op
Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 12:45:07PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Debconf is already in standard. Three packages of > standard priority
> > use debconf (console-tools, console-data, setserial). All are priority
> > required.
>
> What is with lynx? Lynx is standard and _de
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:44:29AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> Is it possible to play the game without the music? If so you might
> consider placing it in main with a Recommends: or Suggests: for
> the non-free music.
>
It seems to work. I think only the *.MODs are copyrighted and the
soun
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 12:45:07PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Debconf is already in standard. Three packages of > standard priority
> use debconf (console-tools, console-data, setserial). All are priority
> required.
What is with lynx? Lynx is standard and _depends_ on debconf. I would
also appreci
Hi Bernhard!
On Sat, 02 Sep 2000, Bernhard Josef Rieder wrote:
> Package: penguin-command
>
> Section: non-free/games
>
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depe
Package: penguin-command
Section: non-free/games
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:47:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:26:53PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > First of all, by this message you have our permission to distribute a
> > > modified version of IMAPD.
> > That to me says Debian has permission to re-distribut
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:26:53PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > First of all, by this message you have our permission to distribute a
> > modified version of IMAPD.
>
> That to me says Debian has permission to re-distribute our modified
> version, but that people who recieve it from us do not
Hi Roland!
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 06:21:51PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > 751 seems more reasonable IMO.
>
> This sounds also reasonable for me. And because of the x-bit UserDirs,
> etc. should work. Does anyone objects if I change this with
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 06:21:51PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> 751 seems more reasonable IMO.
This sounds also reasonable for me. And because of the x-bit UserDirs,
etc. should work. Does anyone objects if I change this with the next
upload of adduser? Consider that this is only the default beha
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 05:40:15PM -0500, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
:On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:57:20PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
:> Kurt Seifried
:
:While we are at it. Kurt critizes that adduser creates home
:directories readable for all users by default. The woody version has
:an option
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 05:40:15PM -0500, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> Shall we make something like 700 default?
No. Resist the urge to dumb things down. Better to insist on intelligent,
responsible users who have been educated, and have educated themselves,
about the realities of computer securi
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 10:07:04AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > want. Shall we make something like 700 default? It would break some
> > things like "UserDir public_html" in Apache, etc. In my school server
>
> You could make it 711.
751 seems more reasonable IMO.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTEC
Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> want. Shall we make something like 700 default? It would break some
> things like "UserDir public_html" in Apache, etc. In my school server
You could make it 711.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>
On 2901T104626-0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> find. The policy manual says look in build-essential. The control
> file for Build-essential says look in policy manual
The policy manual says look for the *informational* list in
build-essential. build-essential says look for the *definition* in
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:57:20PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> Kurt Seifried
While we are at it. Kurt critizes that adduser creates home
directories readable for all users by default. The woody version has
an option in /etc/adduser.conf to change it to any value you
want. Shall we make some
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:55:09PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Those people would be equally well served by a note or check at the
> beginning of the debian/rules file; we didn't need policy and a new
> control file headers for that.
That sounds like an ideal addition to debhelper; wouldn't th
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 04:35:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 12:04:23AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:37:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Purists happen to be whoever disagrees with Hamish Moffat. Cf. his
> > By the way, please
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:59:00PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> Would the following work as expected:
> Depends: sendmail (>= 8.9.3), sendmail (<< 8.9.4)
libapache-mod-ssl does it:
Package: libapache-mod-ssl
Version: 2.6.4-1.3.12-1
Priority: optional
Section: non-US
Maintainer: Miquel van Smo
Steve Greenland wrote:
> So I'm supposed to go back and figure out if my packages can be
> successfully built with debhelper 2.0.58? If so, how can I -- is there
> a complete archive of all released debhelpers somewhere?
Please read the bottom of http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I think that since every package using a helper package seems
> to need a versioned dependency
I don't see any reason why versioned build-dependancies on debhelper are
any more common that versioned build dependancies on say, the C
compiler. Not to mention the C++
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> dpkg-dev is an extremely stable interface, something you can not
> say for debhelper.
Prove it. (See my earlier message about make.)
--
see shy jo, pissed off
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Been tortured by your latin teacher with Asterix, the Gaulle? You always
wanted to impress him? Well, then hodie is for you.
What does it do?
It has the same functionality as the date (1) program, only... It
has it in grammatically correct latin.
It is distributed under the MIT license.
55 matches
Mail list logo
