Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>"Herbert" == Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Herbert> And this is Debian where we have a policy that says #!/bin/sh
> scripts
> Herbert> need to be POSIX compliant.
> What policy says is:
We were talking about echo -ne, not echo -n
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 01:17:20PM +1100, Trent Swift wrote:
> When you telnet/ssh from an xterm on a dec/solaris box to potato
> machine with ncurses.v.5.0-6, and then run less (or something that
> uses /etc/terminfo/x/xterm) the screen goes into reverse video for all
> output and with vi/emacs th
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:06:30PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Which is just a stupid pain in the ass. I had to track through three
> different references and finally install the "build-depends" package to
> find out what I could leave out of by "Build-Depends" stanza. It would
> *much* easier
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:37:52PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> (especially since this looks like just the well-established behavior of
>downloading changed packages..)
I dont have a example right now, but on my system aptitude will download the
same package again and again. So in case it
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Vincent L. Mulhollon wrote:
> Perhaps any package can live in unstable, but any package that has a
> release critical bug older than 1 week is zapped from stable and placed back
> in unstable. Upon next package upload, it will be reinstated into stable.
T
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Peter Teichman wrote:
> I have one question. What is the preferred way for me to handle our
> gtk package? This is a library package that we actually apply some
> patches to for a slightly nicer user interface.
Well, we don't have much provision for flavors of shared librari
On 30 Aug 2000, Alex Romosan wrote:
> > It means the libc6 package you have installed has a different md5sum then
> > the package it finds on ftp.corel.com, and assumes that the version on
No, this is not at all how it works..
> which are not on by default and then i have to put the packages on
Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That still begs the question of the autobuild stuff - does it ignore
> the Build-Depends? If so, why...
This is really weird. It's not supposed to! Somehow it didn't see
yours or something!
>
> --
> Rick
>
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi.
I've just orphaned the following packages, because I don't use these
anymore.
x11/xipmsg:
XIP Messenger is a pop up style message communication software.
x11/wmitime:
yet another clock dock app for Window Maker
editors/yc-el:
Yet another Canna client for Emacsen.
I uploaded packages as
> Given that perl generally provides an option for backward compatibility
> to a previous release, it would seem that a cleaner alternative is
> available. I have prepared a set of non-versioned `perl', `perl-base',
> etc. packages for 5.6.0 to demonstrate the proposal:
I've been running these fo
Hi all,
I'm having problems with ncurses-base. We have a lot of Solaris 2.6 and
Dec Alphas 4.0D and a couple of linux boxes. We're trying to move most
of lab machines (~300) over from pc.i86.solaris to debian linux but
I've got an annoying xterm problem.
When you telnet/ssh from an xterm on a de
> What does it mean? console-apt is not in potato and is it put again in
> stable?
rumours about console-apt taking over the world are greatly
exaggerated
*cough*
randolph
--
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.TauSq.org/
Seems like my mirror has somehow not been
able to update. The latest I've got is M15..
Should check fmirror configuration.
Thanks,
--
-+++-+++-++-++-++--+---++- --- -- - -
+ Eray "exa" Ozkural . . . . . .
+ CS, Bilkent University, Ankara
I have been using ntop (the version in Debian) for sevel month now,
(BI would like to adopt ntop.
(B
(BAs I am not familiar with newer upstream versions and there seems to be
(Ba licence problem with some chart drawing software ntop uses, consider this
(Ban preliminary Intent to Adopt.
(B
(
On 30-Aug-2000 Brian May wrote:
> Ok,
>
> Can somebody explain the following?
>
>>From http://www.debian.org/Bugs/>, click on
> "Index of maintainers of packages with bug reports.", and then
> "Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" takes you to:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ma/lBrian_May,bam,debian.
Brian May wrote:
> Can somebody explain the following?
>
> >From http://www.debian.org/Bugs/>, click on
> "Index of maintainers of packages with bug reports.", and then
> "Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" takes you to:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ma/lBrian_May,bam,debian.org,.html>
>
> Why is b
Ok,
Can somebody explain the following?
>From http://www.debian.org/Bugs/>, click on
"Index of maintainers of packages with bug reports.", and then
"Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" takes you to:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ma/lBrian_May,bam,debian.org,.html>
Why is bug #69807, for my diskless-i
If that lib's in M17, how do I get M17 debs?
Thanks,
--
-+++-+++-++-++-++--+---++- --- -- - -
+ Eray "exa" Ozkural . . . . . .
+ CS, Bilkent University, Ankara ^ . o . .
| mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. ^ . .
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:43:01PM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> orion:exa$ galeon
> /usr/bin/galeon-bin: error in loading shared libraries: libgtkembedmoz.so:
> cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> What's happening? Where's this library? How could I install the package
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:26:06PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> I would like to take it, however, I am not a developer, yet, so you'd
> have to sponsor it.
Sure. If nobody else object it's yours. Just send me the package if
you are done with first packaging.
Roland
--
Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAI
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 08:51:47PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> The definition is the following:
>
> It is not be necessary to explicitly specify build-time relationships
> on a minimal set of packages that are always needed to compile, link
> and put in a Debian package
On 30-Aug-00, 15:08 (CDT), Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously Steve Greenland wrote:
> > It is not unreasonable to assume that the latest-and-greatest version of
> > all the build-essential packages will be installed.
>
> I wonder what world you are living in. It is in reali
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:34:54PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> > Installed:
> > console-apt_0.7.7.2potato1_i386.deb
> > to dists/proposed-updates/console-apt_0.7.7.2potato1_i386.deb
>
> What does it mean? console-apt is not in potato and is it put again in
> stable?
It means that it may en
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Isn't it time to remove emacs19 from unstable? The emacs20 package is more
> than 2 1/2 years old and RMS said that emacs19 is no longer supported
> upstream.
Emacs 20 is too painfully slow for anyone who doesn't need the
mule, and has some bugs, s
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 08:15:18PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > Now, I like asclock and I want to keep it. I also want to be able to test
> > a couple of gnome apps (like irssi).
> >
> > Is there a way to make dselect SHUTUP! and keep away
I had the same problem...I had to manually edit the messages after
reading them.
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> Package: imap
> Version: 4.7c-1
>
> (Juhapekka Tolvanen's messages may be found on these mailing lists:
> debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-legal@lists.debi
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The definition is the following:
>
> It is not be necessary to explicitly specify build-time relationships
> on a minimal set of packages that are always needed to compile, link
> and put in a Debian package a standard "Hello World!" p
"Vincent L. Mulhollon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I had a similar thought this weekend.
>
>Perhaps any package can live in unstable, but any package that has a
>release critical bug older than 1 week is zapped from stable and placed back
>in unstable. Upon next package upload, it will be reinstat
Package: imap
Version: 4.7c-1
(Juhapekka Tolvanen's messages may be found on these mailing lists:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-legal@lists.debian.org)
Man, you got great headers on your messages!
I don't know if it was your intension, but you managed to totally screw
up
my inbox (no hard
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It means the libc6 package you have installed has a different md5sum then
> the package it finds on ftp.corel.com, and assumes that the version on
> ftp.corel.com is a newer recompile. Strange logic, but that is how
> libapt-pkg thinks.
>
this is so
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:36:12PM -0400, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:49:27PM -0700, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > > Could anyone please explain
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:49:27PM -0700, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Could anyone please explain this to me? Did Corel do anything to their files
> > that makes apt think it has to upgrade although its
>> Isn't it time to remove emacs19 from unstable? The emacs20 package is more
>> than 2 1/2 years old and RMS said that emacs19 is no longer supported
>> upstream.
In fact, it is in the WNPP with an intent-to-orphan... but people seem
to care enough to keep doing NMU's...
Previously Michael Meskes wrote:
> Could anyone please explain this to me? Did Corel do anything to their files
> that makes apt think it has to upgrade although its up-to-date? Or is this
> a bug in apt?
It means the libc6 package you have installed has a different md5sum then
the package it find
Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> I don't know how the decision ended up being made, but the argument
> I presented at the time is that a dependency on debhelper is far more
> likely to be versioned than the others are. A package that makes use
> of a new feature of debhelper is going to have t
Previously Thomas Guettler wrote:
> Debian is evolving constantly, not in single steps.
True.
> But I am interested
> what you think about this crazy idea to remove
> version numbers (like debian2.2) from debian?
Won't work. Users demand a know really stable system, and with a dynamic
system we
Previously Steve Greenland wrote:
> It is not unreasonable to assume that the latest-and-greatest version of
> all the build-essential packages will be installed.
I wonder what world you are living in. It is in reality a completely
unreasonable assumption.
Wichert.
--
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Michael Meskes wrote:
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
> uppercase=bad)
> ||/ NameVersionDescription
> +++-===-==-===
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For your amusement: (it's actually been a year or two since I last posted
> this now too... The comments are probably pretty outdated)
>
> Bugs Over Two Years Old
>...
>Package: emacs19
>Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > Could anyone please explain this to me? Did Corel do anything to their files
> > that makes apt think it has to upgrade although its up-to-date? Or is this
> > a bug in apt?
>
> I see this quite often, so it is a bug in the curret apt lib. aptitude
Hi,
my suggestion about choosing between a simple to install or increased
security: you can work for easy installing and giving the people the freedom
to choice at the end of the installation process if secure the system. There
will be a procedure at the end of the installation that will take any a
> >
> > You cannot use it as a default shell without auditing all scripts.
> >
>
> I have used ash for over a year now as my /bin/sh.
>
OK, OK, OK, I surrender.
I have to admit my experience was rather old
and the quantity of bashisms have sharply decreased. So you can run
a
Previously Paul Slootman wrote:
> Then you must have some other arrangement to get the colors;
> it's not enabled by default. Try a fresh install (I have).
> Maybe a direct setting of LS_COLORS in your .bash_profile or
> whatever?
Nope:
[tornado;~/cistron]-15> env|grep LS
zsh: done env |
>
> You cannot use it as a default shell without auditing all scripts.
>
I have used ash for over a year now as my /bin/sh.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent L. Mulhollon) writes:
> Perhaps any package can live in unstable, but any package that has a
> release critical bug older than 1 week is zapped from stable and placed back
> in unstable. Upon next package upload, it will be reinstated into stable.
Ack! Can you imagine
>>"Herbert" == Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> And this is Debian where we have a policy that says #!/bin/sh scripts
Herbert> need to be POSIX compliant.
What policy says is:
The standard shell interpreter ``/bin/sh'' can be a symbolic link to
any POSIX compat
orion:exa$ galeon
/usr/bin/galeon-bin: error in loading shared libraries: libgtkembedmoz.so:
cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
What's happening? Where's this library? How could I install the package
if this is a dependency?
Thanks,
--
-+++-+++-++-++-++--+---++-
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:52:16PM -0400, Randolph Chung wrote:
> Installed:
> console-apt_0.7.7.2potato1_i386.deb
> to dists/proposed-updates/console-apt_0.7.7.2potato1_i386.deb
What does it mean? console-apt is not in potato and is it put again in
stable?
bye
Christian
--
Christian Surchi
"JG" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Don't forget to put this field in debian/control:
>>
>> Send-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JG> Whoa! What packages understand this, and where is it documented?
Sorry this is a error.
The right place for this is in:
/usr/share/bug/$package/cont
Thomas Guettler wrote:
> But I am interested
> what you think about this crazy idea to remove
> version numbers (like debian2.2) from debian?
It's really crazy. Removing version numbers mean that the
dependency graph must be synchronized globally which is
impossible AFAIK. In addition to this, it
Hello.
Anand Kumria schrieb:
> Not having the helper packages included in the autobuild system appears to
> benefit, at most, around ~470 packages.
May I ask how they benefit?
It's only a (little) burden on the packages that use debhelper,
but I can't see any benefits for packages not using it.
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't forget to put this field in debian/control:
>
> Send-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whoa! What packages understand this, and where is it documented?
>
> Christian
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsub
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
On 2830T130630-0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> find out what I could leave out of by "Build-Depends" stanza. It would
> *much* easier for developers, if less ideologically pure, to just list
> the damn packages on the Developers Corner part of the webs
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 06:59:25PM +0200, Daniele Cruciani wrote:
> I've read on this list about ITP of galeon (web browser), but
> i don't remenber who announce ITP and I can't find that package on
> experimental.
I have made a package which can be found uder
http://www.debian.org/~rb/galeo
Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you guys and girls seen this? What do you think about it?
>
> http://www.securityportal.com/closet/
I demur from the generally benign flavor of the reactions I've seen so far. I
think this was a hatchet job by a guy who appears completely disi
Robert van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't like crossposting to mailinglists, so i post this to debian-devel,
>as well as a Cc to the original author.
Maybe you should have *really* Cc'd the original author :) (Read the
article again; he isn't Juhapekka, that's for sure ...)
--
Co
On 30-Aug-00, 12:51 (CDT), Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2830T112651-0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > That's pretty much the definition (or at least the *use*) of
> > Build-Essential: packages that may be assumed to be present, so that
> > they need not be listed in Bu
Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I fear, that it will take so much time, that we must have separately
> packaged XEmacs/Gtk meanwhile. And I fear, that latest upstream sources
> of XEmacs will ship with too old version of XEmacs/Gtk. Just check out,
> how old version of Gnus and Au
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 08:30:39PM -0500, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
Sorry, /me is a fool. I should have looked in the bug database before
reporting this. :-/ Nevertheless I've made a galeon package which should
work ok. You can find them under http://www.debia
On 2830T112651-0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 29-Aug-00, 16:05 (CDT), Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it make sense to make policy something like "All official Debian
> > auto-build machines will have installed this set of build packages: gcc,
> > ..., and debhelper. Deb
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:20:48AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> 3) Libraries - All possible effort should be made to make Debian the
> primary source of libraries. Period full stop. This is so important
> because of what we are seeing with helix and their special library
> pack
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Ashley Clark wrote:
> They are courtesy of PostgreSQL, the behaviour of the config file has
> changed between two of the versions. You can add PGDEBUG=0 to your
> /etc/postgresql/postmaster.init file and they will disappear.
>
Cool!
Thanks,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "
Hi,
I've read on this list about ITP of galeon (web browser), but
i don't remenber who announce ITP and I can't find that package on
experimental.
thank you.
--
Daniele Cruciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Universita` di Pisa - Informatica -
http://www.cli.di.unipi.it/~cruciani/
> A Debian package is either unstable, (testing) or stable.
> And everybody should use the package that fits his needs.
>
> Debian is evolving constantly, not in single steps.
>
> But I am interested
> what you think about this crazy idea to remove
> version numbers (like debian2.2) from debian?
Previously Christian Marillat wrote:
> Don't forget to put this field in debian/control:
> Send-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where did that come from That won't do anything at all and will make
dpkg-gencontrol complain loudly at you.
Wichert.
--
_
Hi,
If you were to augment apt-show-source in the following ways, I can see
it becoming a household word :)
I think for people inside debian who "never gets out", this package can
be useful, because then they can see what upstream source pkg to get if
they decide to poke outside.
However, I don
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Jules Bean wrote:
> Well, they're from Postgres, I can tell you that much.
OK...
>
> Probably you have one of the debug trace options on in your postgres
> config files (in /etc/postgresql).
"I have"? ;-)
I looked in /etc/postgresql and found several files, none of which s
On 30-Aug-00, 04:21 (CDT), Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't know how the decision ended up being made, but the argument
> I presented at the time is that a dependency on debhelper is far more
> likely to be versioned than the others are. A package that makes use
> of a new
On 29-Aug-00, 16:05 (CDT), Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it make sense to make policy something like "All official Debian
> auto-build machines will have installed this set of build packages: gcc,
> ..., and debhelper. Debian packages are not required to specify build
> depend
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Anthony,
> >
> > Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
> > we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
> >
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> "PT" == Peter Teichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> PT> This solution looks like the best one. I'll start rebuilding our
> PT> packages immediately.
>
> Don't forget to put this field in debian/control:
>
>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:49:27PM -0700, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Could anyone please explain this to me? Did Corel do anything to their files
> that makes apt think it has to upgrade although its up-to-date? Or is this
> a bug in apt?
I see this quite often, so it is a bug in the curret apt lib.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:05:58PM +0200, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> But I am interested
> what you think about this crazy idea to remove
> version numbers (like debian2.2) from debian?
How do u call slink? "Old Stable"? :)
No i think it is not a bad idea to have a version number. The only question
* Jimmy O'Regan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000829 22:40]:
> ) But are there any features that
> ) mutt and slrn do not offer yet?
> How about "it's pine" ;)
No further questions. ;-)
> Problem is though, the discussion about the IMAPD license
> started with rms mentioning that the FSF had tried to
> r
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2000-08-31
Severity: normal
Source: bbdate
Section: unknown
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 1.2.9), xlib6g-dev, libstdc++-dev, g++
Standards-Version: 3.1.1
Package: bbdate
Architecture: any
Depends:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2000-08-31
Severity: normal
Source: bbdate
Section: x11
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 1.2.9), xlib6g-dev, libstdc++-dev, g++
Standards-Version: 3.1.1
Package: bbdate
Architecture: any
Depends: ${s
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2000-08-31
Severity: normal
Source: bbdate
Section: x11
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 1.2.9), xlib6g-dev, libstdc++-dev, g++
Standards-Version: 3.1.1
Package: bbdate
Architecture: any
Depends: ${s
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2000-08-31
Severity: normal
Source: bbppp
Section: x11
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 1.2.9), xlib6g-dev, libstdc++-dev, g++
Standards-Version: 3.1.1
Package: bbppp
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shl
ANNOUNCE: First official release of "apt-show-source"
What is it?
It's a perl script that parses the dpkg status file and that APT
list files that end with Sources, without any options it prints out all
installed packages and versions were a different version is available
through your sources
Redhat, Suse, Microsoft they need version numbers so that
they can announce their great new release of their operating
system. It is more or less marketing hype.
But Debian is different. It is a collection of several single
application on top of Linux/Hurd. And we don't need the
marketing hype of
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
> we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
> using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written
> script
You may use the following apt source for my ddclient deb and
the sather debs that I've fixed for woody.
deb http://139.179.21.143/~exa/debian/ ./
Please see ITPs on wnpp and on this list for information on these
packages.
Thanks,
__
-+++-+++-++-++-++--+---++- --- -- - -
+ E
* Chris Allegretta
| I found a copy at ftp://ftp.kvaleberg.com/pub/mana-4.0beta.tar.gz, I
| guess it's a mirror. A whole lot of warnings when trying to compile it,
| but it looks interesting.
Actually, I think it's the official site. The official homepage for
Mana is:
http://www.kvaleb
I was running dpkg-scanpackages to construct a custom apt source.
This was the first time I really ran it, so I encountered the
peculiar style that I had to conform to.
This was what I had to write to make a Packages file in a flat dir:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/debian$ dpkg-scanpackages .
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:03:44PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 05:56:28PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>
> > http://home.sol.no/~egilk/mana.html
>
> I was curious to see it, but I can't download. Ftp server does not allow
> anonymous connection...
I found a copy
"PT" == Peter Teichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
PT> This solution looks like the best one. I'll start rebuilding our
PT> packages immediately.
Don't forget to put this field in debian/control:
Send-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian
Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > apache starts up correctly for me on every system boot, and I do have
> > /bin/sh pointing to /bin/ash as well.
>
> My fault. It actually uses #!/bin/bash which it should not anyway
Well, #!/bin/bash scripts are allowed to use bashisms :)
Ulf
I just tried to upgrade my Corel installation via the net and have some
strange behaviour when using apt:
feivel:~# dpkg -l libc6ΒΈ
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Sta
> Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> > If you are right at least apache scripts are not. I suggest you
> > file a bug against it.
>
> If you know how to call apache scripts to demonstrate the error then
> please file the bug yourself.
>
> Check before, if you run an up-to-date apache.
I do
>
>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:31:26PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > Why do you need to run dircolors anyway? I don't and I still get
> > coloured output..
> Then you must have some other arrangement to get the colors;
> it's not enabled by default. Try a fresh install (I have).
> Maybe a direct sett
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:20:48AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > > That is one mechanism of creating a private namespace, isn't another
> > > Setting the origin to something other than Debian?
> >
> > Please see elsewhere in this thread for
* Dale Scheetz in "Strange messages..." dated 2000/08/30 04:17 wrote:
> Since my last upgrade to potato I've been getting a lot of messages
> like the following:
>
> DEBUG: --Relation pg_rules--
> DEBUG: Pages 0: Changed 0, Reapped 0, Empty 0, New 0; Tup 0: Vac 0,
> Keep/VTL 0/0, Crash 0, UnUse
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:02:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > No, there is no difference between our apps and the upstream in most
> > cases. We do brand gnome-core and gdm, but those are the only packages
> > I can think of offhand. Those are only graphics changes, substituting
> > some of
I've just read your article on debian 2.2.
While you make many valid points, I'm confused about a couple of
them.
Moving on. Once the basic install is done, you will discover
that several services are enabled in inetd that shouldn't
be. Discard, daytime, time, shell, login,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 04:17:42AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Since my last upgrade to potato I've been getting a lot of messages like
> the following:
>
> DEBUG: --Relation pg_rules--
> DEBUG: Pages 0: Changed 0, Reapped 0, Empty 0, New 0; Tup 0: Vac 0,
> Keep/VTL 0/0, Crash 0, UnUsed 0, MinL
Quoting Dale Scheetz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Since my last upgrade to potato I've been getting a lot of messages like
> the following:
> There doesn't seem to be any real information here. Can anyone tell me
> what is triggering these messages?
They're postgres debug messages.
Somehow, the newest
Since my last upgrade to potato I've been getting a lot of messages like
the following:
DEBUG: --Relation pg_rules--
DEBUG: Pages 0: Changed 0, Reapped 0, Empty 0, New 0; Tup 0: Vac 0,
Keep/VTL 0/0, Crash 0, UnUsed 0, MinLen 0, MaxLen
0; Re-using: Free/Avail. Space 0/0; EndEmpty/Avail. Pages 0/0
Anton Ivanov wrote:
> If you are right at least apache scripts are not. I suggest you
> file a bug against it.
If you know how to call apache scripts to demonstrate the error then
please file the bug yourself.
Check before, if you run an up-to-date apache.
apache starts up correctly
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Changes:
> > ld.so.preload-manager (0.3.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Closes:#70398
>
> I've noticed sort of a trend here lately. Changelog entries are getting
> more and more ambiguous. Can this stop please?
You won't see anything like
Anthony,
Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written
scripts which I use under mod_perl and the time difference is
astonishing. It wo
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
