On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 07:53:35PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > >The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
> > Most people like it.
>
> BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does
> what someone would expect.
that depends on what you're u
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 10:20:30PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
> Most people like it.
>
> >When using mutt in an xterm, the color bindings in /etc/Muttrc make it
> >very hard to read mail
> >The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
> Most people like it.
BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does what
someone would expect.
> "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> try running:
Ben> dpkg-deb --extract man.deb /tmp/tmpdir
Ben> If that fails too, then add "strace -o dpkg-deb.out" to the
Ben> start of that line and send me the dpkg-deb.out file.
No errors:
lyell:~# dpkg-deb --extra
close 60750
close 60753
thanks
On Mar 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
Most people like it.
>When using mutt in an xterm, the color bindings in /etc/Muttrc make it
>very hard to read mail: 8 different colors on one screen, colored
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 04:49:54PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > During the slink freeze there was some discussion of the wasted
> > bandwidth due to -devel-announce and -announce listing all packages
> > installed/uploaded to all architectures.
> >
Ben Collins wrote:
> > As I recall, the consensus was that, after slink was released,
> > these lists would be split by architecture, and anyone interested in
> > more than one architecture could subscribe to as many lists as
> > required. I am sure that the overwhelming majority would subscr
Hello Siggy,
It seems your are the new maintainer of hwtools. Good :-))
I sent few weeks ago a request to enhance hwtools for multiarch support
(#58060).
In fact, I'm willing to use the scsi stuff on my sparc too (especially scsiinfo
& scsidev). I succedeed to using it with really minor fixe
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 04:49:54PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> During the slink freeze there was some discussion of the wasted
> bandwidth due to -devel-announce and -announce listing all packages
> installed/uploaded to all architectures.
>
> As I recall, the consensus was that, afte
Previously Zed Pobre wrote:
> It's a fairly common ruleset, I think. You can have mine.
That can be done a lot simpler:
:0:
* ^X-Mailing-List:.*debian-devel-changes
{
:0
* ^Subject:.*\((alpha|arm|powerpc|m68k|sparc)\)
/dev/null
:0
debian-devel-changes/
}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi there,
I have put some new version of tetex-* for potato in
ftp.uni-mainz.de/pub/Linux/debian-local for testing.
Please test them for the fixed bugs and let me know if there are
further issues.
from the changelogs:
tetex-bin (1.0.6-4) frozen unstable; urg
Previously Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> Robert Ramiega ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I must have missed it... Anyway it needs dpkg.h and i cant find it on my
> > system... Searcher on Debian Web site can't find it either =o((
>
> it's in dpkg-dev.
It used to be, but I remove libdpkg and its header-file
Solfege is an eartraining program for GNOME written in python.
(http://solfege.sourceforge.net)
I'm the author of the program and Olav Stetzer will be sponsoring me.
The package will be called solfege
Tom Cato Amundsen
I have packaged my selection of Perl/Tk network utils, from:
http://www.whirlnet.co.uk/linux/
All are under GPL.
I've had a package of these sitting around since June, waiting for
new-maintainer to re-open, but now I've become fed up of waiting and
this is being sponsored by Edward Betts <[
I intend to package abook (an ncurses address book program):
http://www.linuxstart.com/~jheinonen/abook/
License is GPL.
I have the package ready.
This package is being sponsored by Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Alan Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
BugScan reporter writes:
> Package: tetex-base (debian/main)
> Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 42698 tetex-base: The french option of babel is broken
>
> Package: tetex-bin (debian/main)
> Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <[EMAIL PROTEC
hi,
i just realized that /etc/shadow are mode 644 (owned by root:root) on
two of my systems. (Another two machines are not affected, however)
i'm sure this change was not made manually, but have no clue what
could have caused it.
a grep in /var/lib/dpkg/info didn't show anything.
anyone got this
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> > Package: lsof (debian/main)
> > Maintainer: Jim Mintha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 57203 lsof does not build with 2.3 kernel headers [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Log
> > for failed build of lsof_4.48-1 (dist=frozen)]
>
> Should this be release-cr
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 09:41:49PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I see. Thanks. I tried unix/localhost:7100 and that doesn't work.
remove that 'localhost' and you are on!
Bye,
Matthias
--
+-created at Sun Mar 19 10:59:46 CET 2000-+
|Matthias Berse
Tom Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 05:30:41PM +0100, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > Currently i've subscribed to devel-changes on another mail account which
> > only serves for sorting out the relevant (at least for me) parts. These
> > are sorted out using procmail (which is no
On Mar 17, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, David Starner wrote:
> > Honestly, I found the interface of ImageMagick to be too clumsy
> > to just view pictures. Until I grabbed xzgv out of Incoming,
> > xv was the least clumsy graphic viewer interface. The authors
> > of xzgv have produced
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> It might be he wants to talk about -changes ? There he's right (and I do
> totally agree with him).
I'm not excited about a list per architecture, but I've often wondered if
only posting to the lists messages for uploads that include source might not
be
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 09:46:25AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
> Package: communicator (debian/contrib)
> Maintainer: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 60193 communicator: buss error when replying to message
Communicator is a meta package. This bug should be reassigned to
the version of netsc
23 matches
Mail list logo
