Ian Lynagh wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes
> >These are installed now.
>
> I assume the delay with libgtop1 was that it was a new package? If so,
> please remove libgtop0.
Yes... I'll get around to that later :-)
Richard Braakman
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> Previously Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> > Do I have access to the net within that environment? I just have some
> > pre-release slink CDs, so I have to upgrade to the current point
> > release by ftp (by an ISDN line - it is accessed like a NIC
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 09:10:54AM +1000, Daniel James Patterson wrote:
> Squirm is a URL redirector for squid.
>
> It provides a fast means for squid to modify URLs according to a set
> rule that the administrator applies.
>
Oh, I forgot to mention that it's under the GPL and you can look at it
Squirm is a URL redirector for squid.
It provides a fast means for squid to modify URLs according to a set
rule that the administrator applies.
It is useful for things like
a) redirecting requests for common files to internal cached copies
b) restricting access to URLS and redirecting them
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> "warning: ignoring unknown format `$$format_data{'format'}'"
Joey> if $ENV{DOC_BASE_GRIPE}; }
This is a nice solution.
--
Brought to you by the letters G and B and the number 7.
"When you had it, you didn't want it. Now yo
> "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> Geeze -- ok, I'll fix it tonight.
Thanks! I didn't mean to sound concilatory, but it seems a lot of
packages have a lot of doc-base warnings these days..
--
Brought to you by the letters N and P and the number 19.
"You should b
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>I've been noticing that, even though we're all encouraged to use
>doc-base nowadays, that doc-base emits noxious and obnoxious warnings
>whenever it sees a format it doesn't recognize.
>
>I've just adapted libgtk1.2-doc to use doc-base, and on EVERY instal
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> Is there any way we can make the default for doc-base to *not* warn on
> these unknown formats? Frankly, it's just ugly as all get-out. :)
--- /usr/sbin/install-docs Sat Jan 2 01:48:28 1999
+++ ./install-docs Wed May 12 15:27:12 1999
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@
} el
Hi !
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fumitoshi UKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can volunteer to do it, if it is really needed and anyone object to it.
> I've been maintain Debian JP machines, ftp archive, web server,
> mailing-list and Debian official mirror in Japan about two years or three
Torsten Landschoff writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On another machine, this a 300Mhz K6-2, I invoked W3 in Xemacs20
>> (using lisp interaction mode to eliminate the wait for the user to
>> enter a URL). In this case it was 10 seconds for .elc files, 15
>> seconds if it had to byte-compile t
Hi
> Can someone please package plib, which is Steve's Portable Game Library.
> It has a LGPL license so it can go into main without problem.
I grabed the sources and had a look at it. As it is my first
package with shared libraries and -dev and -doc and such it
first tried it and it seems to w
>
> Query, is there actually a coding style guideline for debian stuph?
>
> Basically I'm with the Corel Linux group and this is what the Corel
> Linux Coding guidelines say... (follows). A few note-worthy ones are:
> - tabs: 2 spaces
> - curly braces alway on next line
>
I've been noticing that, even though we're all encouraged to use
doc-base nowadays, that doc-base emits noxious and obnoxious warnings
whenever it sees a format it doesn't recognize.
I've just adapted libgtk1.2-doc to use doc-base, and on EVERY install
or removal, I get:
Setting up libgtk1.2-doc
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 02:40:33PM -0700, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Propose it on -Policy and be sure the cc' the ftpmasters. An issue to
> consider is manpower. Since most of the maintainers will up to Potato,
> who'll compile these new packages/updates for slink?
Can't autobuilders do it (with
Hi,
On 12 May, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> I assume the delay with libgtop1 was that it was a new package? If so,
> please remove libgtop0.
Right. That's what Guy told me. You should probably e-mail the ftp
masters about your desire to remove libgtop0 from the archive.
-Ossama
--
Ossama Othman <[EM
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
>Ossama Othman wrote:
>> GNOME has been copied from the staging area into potato. I believe
>> that just about all of the GNOME packages that I copied into Incoming
>> have been installed into the archive. However, at lea
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 02:06:24PM -0700, David Bristel wrote:
> It seems to me that since there will always be patches and updates to packages
> between releases, and since we have the "proposed" updates, perhaps we could
> add an "updates" area, in addition to the non-free, contrib, and main
> s
It seems to me that since there will always be patches and updates to packages
between releases, and since we have the "proposed" updates, perhaps we could
add an "updates" area, in addition to the non-free, contrib, and main sections.
This would work VERY nicely for users who want to grab the late
Hi Darren,
On 12 May, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 02:42:16PM -0500, Ossama Othman wrote:
> > > Do you mean make GNOME 1.0 available for slink, separately? It's far
> > > too large a change to be part of a stable revision.
> >
> > Hmm. I didn't think of it that way.
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 02:42:16PM -0500, Ossama Othman wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I'm cross-posting to debian-gtk-gnome since we are trying to organize
> an effort to update GNOME for slink.
>
> > > It'd also be nice to get GNOME for slink out too. All that really
> > > needs to be done is to b
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 02:31:39PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On another machine, this a 300Mhz K6-2, I invoked W3 in Xemacs20
> (using lisp interaction mode to eliminate the wait for the user to
> enter a URL). In this case it was 10 seconds for .elc files, 15
> seconds if it had to byte
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you mean make GNOME 1.0 available for slink, separately? It's far
> too large a change to be part of a stable revision.
The current plan, as I understand it, is to build GNOME 1.0 debs for
slink, and turn them over to the GNOME folks for distribu
Hi Richard,
I'm cross-posting to debian-gtk-gnome since we are trying to organize
an effort to update GNOME for slink.
> > It'd also be nice to get GNOME for slink out too. All that really
> > needs to be done is to build all of the packages we built for potato
> > for slink. The current GNO
Ossama Othman wrote:
> GNOME has been copied from the staging area into potato. I believe
> that just about all of the GNOME packages that I copied into Incoming
> have been installed into the archive. However, at least two packages
> should get into the archive before the freeze libgtop1 and lib
On May 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
># launch the session-controlling process. If it dies, so does the session.
>
>#exec logout-button
>exec gnome-session
This is bad. Please try something like:
fxt() { xterm -fg red & exec sleep 999d; }
gnome-session || fxt
--
ciao,
Marco
GENERAL QUESTION:
What is the procedure for getting a UID in the 0-99 range added to Debian?
SPECIFIC QUESTION:
I've noticed in the course of setting up a CVS pserver that it is not
very easy on Debian, and the default is not secure. I would like to
either work with the existing cvs maintainer
Hi,
Sorry for the off-topic post.
A friend of mine needs a software package that does the following:
> I'm looking to set up a couple of web-based
> discussions on my box. I want to have a mailing list with archived
> messages that anyone (or anyone with a password) can read and post to.
>
CTAN are adopting Debian's definition of free software!
(Follow the links in this article, which was
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in comp.text.tex yesterday)
Jules
(Any replies for me to read, Cc: I haven't (yet) resubscribed to -devel)
Robin Fairbairns wrote:
>
> The CTAN team have been concerned, fo
On Wed, 12 May, 1999, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The topic to split debian-devel-changes in a -$ARCH and -sources list was
> proposed a while ago. What happened to it and what are the sentiments on
> splitting it?? I think it's quite high volume because most lists aren't
> intres
At 15:14 +0200 1999-05-12, Sven LUTHER wrote:
I think the issue is the different way that different ppc systems uses to boot
from the CD. I am not entirely sure how amigaos does this, but i bet it is
different from macos ...
Sure, we could choose not to be cd-bootable, best would be to d othis the
On Wed, 12 May, 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Please can I encourage anyone posting to -devel-announce to ensure
> that they have set the Reply-To: field to something sensible, and to
> encourage anyone replying to a -devel-announce posting to check where
> they are sending their reply. (Hint: -dev
On Wed, 12 May, 1999, Vincent Renardias wrote:
>
> This version works well enough to be able to run MS Office's install
> program and run Excel95 and Word95. (not all of their features are working
> and there are a lot of painting/refresh bugs, but it's working
> "PrettyWell(tm)".
Is that Excel95
theme-convertors is a package written by myself that will convert
themes[1] to .deb files.
At the moment, this works on GTK themes and WindowMaker themes. The
package includes a Perl library Debian::ThemeConvertors which holds
common code to the two convertors, so adding convertors for other
thing
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 07:00:31PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 04:06:36PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Sorry, you are right, it is the hugs package who is non-free, didn't know
> > there
> > was a free version around.
>
>
> In related note, according to unoffi
Hi,
The topic to split debian-devel-changes in a -$ARCH and -sources list was
proposed a while ago. What happened to it and what are the sentiments on
splitting it?? I think it's quite high volume because most lists aren't
intresting to me, but some are.
B.
--
B. Warmerdam
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 04:06:36PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Sorry, you are right, it is the hugs package who is non-free, didn't know
> there
> was a free version around.
The free hugs98 is pre-release so I'm keeping the stable non-free version
around. When hugs98 is released for good (upstre
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?
Could we just add some sort of mail filter rule that forces a
Reply-To: to be set, and either adds Reply-To: debian-devel or returns
the mail to the sender with an explanation if none
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?
absolutely. the logo thread on debian-devel-announce seriously pissed me
off, because i don't filter the -announce lists with procmail.
-vinny
That link suddenly appeared on my system as well, immediately following
a "apt-get upgrade" which I performed yesterday (I'm running potato).
I've got no converted RPMs whatsoever (or any other converted formats,
for that matter).
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:03:22AM -0400, Randolph Chung wrote:
> I
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 08:08:06AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
>
apus - supports CD booting, but don't know how ?
> chrp - ?
> pmac - supports CD booting - how?
> prep - supports CD booting - as I described.
>
but would it not be nice to but the boot stuff for everyone of this system on
one "par
At 12 May 1999 08:09:01 +0900,
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think so. and more, I hope that the site for dupload established
> in Japan so that we can select the near site to upload our packages.
>
> In current standard /etc/dupload.conf contains "chiark" (uk), "master" (us?),
>
>> "AVC" == Aaron Van Couwenberghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AVC> Ok, um, then I will write some scripts today for a
AVC> slink-gnome-stage-area. ;)
There is one already. See the readme master.debian.org/~jim/gnome
BTW: compiling gnome is a pain. We _need_ source dependencies
... Everytime I
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:09:02PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > No! Only one (2) cd for all powerpc systems. Please think about a wrapper
> > for this
> > or special boot-arguments ... but not 5 different powerpc-images.
>
> I think the issue is t
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I doubt it, since the old ssh package is already in place, so this'll
> probably get overriden.
You have a point there... I had this:
Installing:
apache-ssl_1.3.6.4+1.32-1_m68k.deb
to dists/potato/non-US/main/binary-m68k/apache-ssl_1.3.6.4+1.32-1.deb
An
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?
Yes!
But I wouldn't want to be the moderator... so maybe your suggestion is
enough. Perhaps an auto-moderator, which rejects messages lacking a
Reply-To: header (
> On 12 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > ssh (1.2.26-4) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* make sure that ssh1 gets user suid bit set (closes: #37127)
> > Files:
> > 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc
> > 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 n
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:44:15PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc
> > 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 non-us/net optional
> > ssh_1.2.26-4.diff.gz
> > d24a8fe61a54ecace08cf6349bfd5e93 430966 non-us/net opt
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:03:22AM -0400, Randolph Chung wrote:
>
>> I have just had this file appear on my system. It is a broken link and
>> "dpkg -S" doesn't tell me anything about it. It appeared when I
>> installed about a dozen of the latest potato packages yesterday...
>>
>> Does anyone k
In reference to a message from Russell Coker, dated May 12:
> I have just had this file appear on my system. It is a broken link and
> "dpkg -S" doesn't tell me anything about it. It appeared when I installed
> about a dozen of the latest potato packages yesterday...
>
> Does anyone know what it
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Randolph Chung wrote:
>In reference to a message from Russell Coker, dated May 12:
>> I have just had this file appear on my system. It is a broken link and
>> "dpkg -S" doesn't tell me anything about it. It appeared when I installed
>> about a dozen of the latest potato pack
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 04:48:29PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:16:25PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > # apt-get install hugs98 -- the Haskell User's Gofer System
> >
> > But it is non-free
>
> Oh. Perhaps then hugs98 should be moved out of main, ye
In reference to a message from Russell Coker, dated May 12:
> I have just had this file appear on my system. It is a broken link and
> "dpkg -S" doesn't tell me anything about it. It appeared when I installed
> about a dozen of the latest potato packages yesterday...
>
> Does anyone know what it
Previously Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> Do I have access to the net within that environment? I just have some
> pre-release slink CDs, so I have to upgrade to the current point
> release by ftp (by an ISDN line - it is accessed like a NIC).
Sure. You are just using the same system, only the root of
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:16:25PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > # apt-get install hugs98 -- the Haskell User's Gofer System
>
> But it is non-free
Oh. Perhaps then hugs98 should be moved out of main, yes?
Hugs98 is under the Artistic license.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho A7 <[EMAIL PRO
On 12 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ssh (1.2.26-4) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* make sure that ssh1 gets user suid bit set (closes: #37127)
> Files:
> 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc
> 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 non-us/net option
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> >> "WA" == Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> WA> But vmware is non-free while there is a perfect method to do the
> WA> same without vmware:
>
> Looks like the thing I was looking for. For compilation, this sh
>> "WA" == Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WA> But vmware is non-free while there is a perfect method to do the
WA> same without vmware:
Looks like the thing I was looking for. For compilation, this should
work, I will try it.
WA> simply create a chroot slink environment and work
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 12:20:15PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> >> "MB" == Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Aargh, send too early...
>
> MB> So far, I have
>
> imlib, orbit, gtop, gtk-engines and I am building bone-libs right now.
>
> In the FAQ on the gnome site, t
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 08:01:44PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 01:37:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Or Norman Ramsey's NoWeb, which also has a large following and is language
> > independent.
>
> ... or write in Haskell, which has standard support for liter
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:09:02PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > > > > There's also another thing that need to be worked on, the CDs. The
> > > > > script creating the images is not smart enough to select just the
> > > > > good number of packages for each CDs. Currently, the two binary CDs
> >
Source: pipsecd
Maintainer: Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Section: net
Priority: optional
Standards-Version: 2.5.1.0
Package: pipsecd
Architecture: any
Description: IPsec tunnel implementation
This package allows secure tunnels (to build virtual private networks for
example) between two hos
> > > > There's also another thing that need to be worked on, the CDs. The
> > > > script creating the images is not smart enough to select just the
> > > > good number of packages for each CDs. Currently, the two binary CDs
> > > > can still be generated for potato but not the source images (they
> Practical question from a porter: imagine some of my recent uploads
> have rejected, because they do not follow yet the new sceme.
> Allthough when the source package was uploaded, there was no new
> scheme yet. Now when I build that package I have to edit
> debian/control as a porter otherwise
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 02:08:13PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Who decides weather a non-US package goes in non-US/main, non-US/contrib or
> non-US/non-free? Are there any guidelines available?
Yes, actually, the Debian Free Software Guidelines :)
Software that is threatened by US crypto
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So, for example, GnuPG package would have `Section: non-US/main` in its
>debian/control file, and ssh would have `Section: non-US/non-free`.
Ah, OK. Thanks. libapache-mod-ssl will have Section: non-US/main then.
Mike.
--
In
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 01:16:07PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
>
> > > There's also another thing that need to be worked on, the CDs. The
> > > script creating the images is not smart enough to select just the
> > > good number of packages for each CDs.
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 08:09:01AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
> I hope that the site for dupload established
> in Japan so that we can select the near site to upload our packages.
>
> In current standard /etc/dupload.conf contains "chiark" (uk), "master" (us?),
> "erlangen" (de), and "giano" (i
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 14:08:13 +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Who decides weather a non-US package goes in non-US/main, non-US/contrib or
> non-US/non-free? Are there any guidelines available?
This is the subject of current threads in debian-policy; please follow
those.
Ray
--
Obsig: de
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> debian/control file contains:
> Section: non-us/net
>
> > or
> >
> > - unstable
> > - non-US
> > - non-free
>
> debian/control file contains:
> Section: non-us/non-free
Who decides weather a non-US package goes in non-US/main, non-US/contrib or
non-US
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 12:38:36PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> How do I distinguish between "stable" and "unstable" in this scenario ?
>
> How do I define that my package should go into:
>
> - unstable
> - non-US
> - main
>
> or
>
> - unstable
> - non-US
> - non-free
>
> There is so
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >So specify the section as `non-us/non-free' or `non-us/contrib'. It's
> >fine to put something after that if you want to, `non-us/non-free/web'
> >for example. It will just be ignored.
>
> How do I distinguish between "stable" and "unstable" in this scenario ?
B
> >So specify the section as `non-us/non-free' or `non-us/contrib'. It's
> >fine to put something after that if you want to, `non-us/non-free/web'
> >for example. It will just be ignored.
>
> How do I distinguish between "stable" and "unstable" in this scenario ?
That goes in the changelog entr
Hi Jason!
> Does anyone know where I can find the software to run a debian
> upload queue? I thought it was packaged but I can't seem to find it
> using the obvois searches..
It's in project/misc/debianqueued-0.8.tar.gz. It's no proper Debian
package because it runs on other Unixes, too (mine ru
Le Wed, May 12, 1999 at 12:40:31PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu écrivait:
> The following doesn't work, I must have missed something obvious.
Yes. :)
> deb http://nonus.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non-us/main
> non-us/contrib non-us/non-free
It's non-US/main non-US/contrib non-US/non-free !
Chee
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Files:
> cf79475df098c2e9a87087404eb98a86 664 misc optional mysql_3.22.22-1.dsc
> 1a0eedbe7cda20845ec2e767b96ade5c 3762716 misc optional
> mysql_3.22.22.orig.tar.gz
> 9fb7fcddfad966f66d9d5b6f2e0dea00 15068 misc optional mysql_3.22.22-1.diff.gz
>
Previously Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> The vmware environment is great. Finally a way to compile for slink on
> a potato box. And it is great for testing. You can test installations
> (and take screenshots), test upgrade paths and discard the changes
> made during the session, so you can try again
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 12:40:31 +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> What should be put in sources.list files?
deb ftp://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non-US/main non-US/contrib
non-US/non-free
HTH,
Ray
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Many of you are confused because you are getting messages that your
>packages are new when they really aren't, or perhaps dinstall is
>rejecting them because it can't find the orig.tar.gz.
>
>Because nonus is now divided into mai
>> "MB" == Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Aargh, send too early...
MB> So far, I have
imlib, orbit, gtop, gtk-engines and I am building bone-libs right now.
In the FAQ on the gnome site, there is info anout the sequence you
have to use.
Ciao,
Martin
>> "AVC" == Aaron Van Couwenberghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ GNOME rebuild for slink ]
AVC> I can do this, albeit gradually. Um, to set a time frame, I'd say
AVC> I could have the majority of the gnome packages built on slink
AVC> (if everything works smoothly) within a week or so.
Not to d
a new version of jdk117 from blackdown (v3) has been released. apparently,
the problems with glibc2.1 have been resolved, though i haven't checked this
out myself.
is anybody working on packaging it? can i help?
-vinny
-- Vincent Murphy | CompSci Undergrad, UCC | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (086) 83
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> Does anyone know where I can find the software to run a debian upload
> queue? I thought it was packaged but I can't seem to find it using the
> obvois searches..
There is a tar.gz file in project/misc.
-Remco
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "ADC" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
ADC> Are these two JP specific? I noticed from your uploads that the
ADC> install fails if LANG is unset or set as "C". This kinda warned me
ADC> that maybe it wouldn't work for english?
No. Not JP
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dependency of magicfilter
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 12:17:47 -0400
> Note that the same problem occurs when using magicfilter with gs-aladdin.
You are right. So I searched the lists of BTS and found that the same
problem is already reported.
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Homapages in list of maintainers
Date: 11 May 1999 03:18:28 -0400
> I would hope that we could accept official Japanese identification.
> I'd have to leave it up to James to say for sure.
I believe that what kind of idetification is acceptable
I have just had this file appear on my system. It is a broken link and
"dpkg -S" doesn't tell me anything about it. It appeared when I installed
about a dozen of the latest potato packages yesterday...
Does anyone know what it is about?
--
I am in London and would like to meet any Linux users h
> "Daniel" == Daniel Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> I will actually point out that although the exact number
Daniel> 80 is arbitrary, the general number "about 80" is not.
The reason for 80 chars is the Mr Hollerith decided that 80 columns
was all he needed to do the US cen
Does anyone know where I can find the software to run a debian upload
queue? I thought it was packaged but I can't seem to find it using the
obvois searches..
Thanks,
Jason
*Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> Anybody remember the old slackware adage? The kernel can load its root FS
> (compressed or not) from a separate floppy. this would bring us up to a
> measly three floppies for floppy install. Besides, most ppl will be doing
> CD boots anway
I wouldn't mi
[follow ups to -policy]
I was just taking a bit of a look around the new non-us trying to figure
out what our stance was on things like IDEA and RSA and unfortunately
can't figure it out. :| (BTW the dns has been swtiched over.. email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if there are issues)
It seems from what I h
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 02:22:10PM -0500, Ossama Othman wrote:
> It'd also be nice to get GNOME for slink out too. All that really
> needs to be done is to build all of the packages we built for potato
> for slink. The current GNOME slink packages are not all up-to-date
> with the potato packages
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 09:08:08PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > The best list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The main problem we are
> > facing is our official 2.2.x kernels are huge, and there's no way to put
> > the kernel and the root.bin image on a single floppy. The proposed
> > solution is buildin
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> only one question, were have the uploads landed? I mean, I am very happy
> that I got confirmation messages, but now I have REJECTED:
> Rejected: gnupg_0.9.5-1_m68k.deb: Old version 9.5-1' >= new version 9.5-1'.
> but I cant find it on nonus
On 10 May 1999, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
[debian.org has loads of nameservers]
>
> Another thing, according to Internic only 3 servers have been registered
> as nameservers for debian.org:
>
> # host -t ns debian.org a.root-servers.net
> debian.org NS BUOY.COM
> debian.
94 matches
Mail list logo
