Hmm, I think this is my first comment on this..
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Tom Lees wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 02:29:04PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Are there any plans to merge this with apt? Seems gdselect has the frontend,
> > and apt has the backend.
>
> Well, I could do with some apt in-b
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 06:02:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I was under the impression that putting hooks in to use crypto was enough
> > to raise the hackles of the export hounds.
>
> Standing near the border and thinking about prime numbers is enough to
> raise the hackles of the expo
At the top of /etc/X11/Xsession, a comment is given:
# global Xsession file -- used by both xdm and xinit (startx)
However, neither xinit or startx appear to be aware of its existence.
Does anyone know whether this is a question of the comment being
obsolete, ahead of its time, or simply wrong?
Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> 1. binary-only NMUs breaks policity
Probably.
> 2. every NMU must be with source
I hope.
> 3. Porters needn't to ask maintainers for permission
No-one has to ask for permission for a NMU. That's the point of a NMU. You
file a bug, you wait a reasonable time, if i
James Troup wrote:
> Who said they were bad?
You did. A few days ago you agreed that bin-only NMU's were not ideal. I
can't dig it up right now.
> They are very rarely necessary however, since
> 99.5% of the time (the only exception I know of is Hartmut's packages)
> i386 packages are already com
At 21:19 +0200 1998-10-10, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 09, "J.H.M. Dassen Ray\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can see pcmcia (28-Sep-98 is needed) and netutils (so that IPv6 is
>> supported), but not "a lot of packages".
>IIRC, libc6 doesn't support IPv6; you need a beta version for that. So this
Hi, John!
Thanks for reminding me about that. Part of the reason I forgot is that there
is no direct link to it from main Web page. Perhaps FAQ-O-Matic deserved it's
place on Main page.
Sasha.
> kushni>
> kushni>If there were some Debian oriented database, where one could
> kushni>add his ex
> This is characteristic of reading and writing outside of array
> bounds. (as determined by malloc)
I linked it with Electric Fence. It didn't report anything though...
M. S.
Martin A. Soto J. Profesor
Departamento de Ingenieria de Sistemas y Comput
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
meskes>On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:19:30PM -0400, Brian White wrote:
meskes>> libmagick4-dev19332 libmagick:
ldconfig-symlink-before-shlib-in-deb LI#67 [217] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott K.
Ellis))
meskes>
meskes>I wish I would understand a message li
Marc Singer writes:
> I was under the impression that putting hooks in to use crypto was enough
> to raise the hackles of the export hounds.
Standing near the border and thinking about prime numbers is enough to
raise the hackles of the export kooks. Ihere has got to be some limit to
the amount o
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Stephen Crowley wrote:
crow>That is ridiculous, there is no reason to remove gnome before the freeze,
if you
FWIW, one of the slashdot commenters on the slink-freeze, commends
slink for including gnome ( he did install the packages, too) .
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTE
Joseph Carter wrote:
> Dpkg now does support gpg though not by default (you might have still been
> away at the time this came up) and it was planned to modify dinstall to
> support both. Did the dinstall mod not happen or something?
Indeed not. It turned out that gpg was not consistent enough
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
kushni>
kushni>If there were some Debian oriented database, where one could
kushni>add his experience about installation of Debian on some
kushni>unusual hardware, I would add mine about ThinkPad 380XD.
THERE IS ! FAQ-O-MATIC !
(Ex
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Really? I use cvs, and hence all my packages are indeed built
> from scratch. I was under the impression that more and more people
> are etting converted to CVS, but I guess that is wishful thinking.
Well I don't use cvs, but my hand-crafted version control and pa
James Troup wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > James Troup wrote:
> > > They don't compile from freshly unpacked source.
> >
> > How odd. Other maintainer must work substantially differently than I, then.
>
> If you're building foobar 1.1-3, do you really recompile from a
> fre
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:29:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> theone wrote:
> > Names after Slink is very simple. They should just be named after
userfriendly characters.
Great - I liked the penguin idea, but the names aren't very practical
for directories... pity... Anyway - are we going to
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:29:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> theone wrote:
> > Names after Slink is very simple. They should just be named after
> > userfriendly characters.
>
> Oooh.. that means our releases would even have their own geek code blocks
> (http://www.userfriendly.org/cast/) ;-)
> "David" == David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Well, what happens when lots of people try it, see that it
David> is broken, and associate Gnome with being broken and
David> unstable? That said, I don't think that will happen if it
David> is loudly declared to be *
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:14:20PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main?
> > There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and
> > code to run pgp or gnupg.
> >
> > (Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version
> > t
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> I think that keeping it on the CD is spurious because the CD
> represents what we know works. Packages that don't work can be
> downloaded from the FTP servers by the people who want to fuss with
> them. Gnome is high profile because it has fancy scre
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:23:38PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard.
> > I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6...
>
> 2.x; we don't accept later stuff.
Dpkg
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard.
> I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6...
The Debian standard is RSA/IDEA (2.6.x compatible) keys, though Debian is
slowly adjusting to
theone wrote:
> Names after Slink is very simple. They should just be named after
> userfriendly characters.
Oooh.. that means our releases would even have their own geek code blocks
(http://www.userfriendly.org/cast/) ;-)
dust_puppy
pitr
aj
chief
cobb
erwin
greg
hillary
mike
smiling_man
stef
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:39:05PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> "Scott K. Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 07:14:20PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > > I'm a little confused. freetype2-dev conflicts with freetype1 (<=
> > > 1.0.0.1998-03-22-1) yet freetype1 is nowhe
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:24:23PM -0700, David Welton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 12:18:21AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Marc Singer wrote:
> > > I installed it yesterday to get a glimpse at what they are doing. I'd
> > > say it should be left out because it doesn't really work. It is
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 12:18:21AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Marc Singer wrote:
> > I installed it yesterday to get a glimpse at what they are doing. I'd
> > say it should be left out because it doesn't really work. It is a
> > fine demonstration, but it doesn't add value to Debian until it
Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> I've traced the problem to splogger blocking. If I kill splogger,
> everything is happy, but no qmail messages get logged.
The problem is that no new unix domain sockets are accept()'ed. I don't
know why.
> Furthermore, I've found that qmail writes to the l
Marc Singer wrote:
> I installed it yesterday to get a glimpse at what they are doing. I'd
> say it should be left out because it doesn't really work. It is a
> fine demonstration, but it doesn't add value to Debian until it can be
> used either a) to hack against, or b) to provide a workable des
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 October 1998, at 12 h 19, the keyboard of Brian White
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The following are packages I feel we can remove:
> ...
> > netatalk 25598 netalk: several problems (and the solution) [64]
> > (Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PR
Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > > The Gnome 0.30 stuff is still under rather heavy development. The
> > > current packages in Slink are pretty much alpha-quality. Lots of
> > > things don't work. It sounds like there will probably be a 1.0
> > > release coming up in a few months that will be thoroughly
Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 14 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Thomas Lakofski wrote:
> > >
> > > Seems that the latest sysklogd package breaks sendmail's (and cron's, just
> > > checked) logging to syslog -- it works for a few minutes, and then no more
> > > logs. I don't know if this is u
Hi,
just in case you haven't noticed yet, I've uploaded a fixed
sysklogd package which is already installed in the archive.
I've reverted a patch that caused problems.
You can also find the package from:
ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-28_i386.deb
Michael Sobolev
"Scott K. Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 07:14:20PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > I'm a little confused. freetype2-dev conflicts with freetype1 (<=
> > 1.0.0.1998-03-22-1) yet freetype1 is nowhere to be found in slink,
> > and the latest version in hamm is 1.0.0
Robert Woodcock wrote:
> As featured on Bugtraq and recently Freshmeat, slocate is a replacement for
> locate/updatedb. It keeps track of UID's for files so that people can't see
> other people's hidden stuff, while still seeing their own.
>
> I'll have it create a diversion for /usr/bin/locate an
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 02:29:04PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Are there any plans to merge this with apt? Seems gdselect has the frontend,
> and apt has the backend.
Well, I could do with some apt in-built dependency handling :) There isnt
time before the freeze, and AFAIK there are no plans now (w
Quoting Stephane Bortzmeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Yes, the current Debian system is really inconvenient. Each time you
> want to do something useful with a documentation (print it, grep it,
> glimpse it, vi it, remember that not every program is able to read
> compressed files and "zcat file.gz |
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:09:23PM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> The intel version of debian packages are in some directory path
> downstream from ../../i386/.. and the package names also carry i386.
> While this is technically correct, it can be missleading to some that
> the package only runs
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 04:02:41PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:32:02AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > > What do you think we should do with the Gnome stuff?
> > >
> > > The Gnome 0.30 stuff is still under rather heavy development. The
> > > current packages in Slink
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 06:55:36PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main?
> There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and
> code to run pgp or gnupg.
>
> (Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version
> to main, I h
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:09:23PM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> The intel version of debian packages are in some directory path
> downstream from ../../i386/.. and the package names also carry i386.
> While this is technically correct, it can be missleading to some that
> the package only runs
The intel version of debian packages are in some directory path
downstream from ../../i386/.. and the package names also carry i386.
While this is technically correct, it can be missleading to some that
the package only runs on an 80386 cpu. The current name for the cpu
family from intel (and cl
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:07:19PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> I've been considering packaging snes9x, and was just wondering whether it
> had already been done.
Yeah, they're done. the package names are snes9x-x, snes9x-svga and
snes9x-server
-- Stephen Crowley (Crow- on IRC)
-- "Ambition is a p
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:32:02AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > What do you think we should do with the Gnome stuff?
> >
> > The Gnome 0.30 stuff is still under rather heavy development. The
> > current packages in Slink are pretty much alpha-quality. Lots of
> > things don't work. It sounds l
On 15 Oct 1998, Andy Mortimer wrote:
> Also, another data point (and BTW, please don't think I'm being
> defensive) is that last time I looked at it, apt still required a
> fairly clean system to start with. Hopefully this has changed while
> I've been out of touch.
Try -f
Jason
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there's a way of making multi CD installs work, then I'm all for it.
>
> One thing: Do people think it's important to keep the possibility of doing a
> one CD install, and still ending up with a useful system ?
"Useful" as in "boots", yes! But you
Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main?
There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and
code to run pgp or gnupg.
(Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version
to main, I hope Brian will let it slip past the freeze, there are no
other differences
> "Michael" == Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:19:30PM -0400, Brian White
Michael> wrote:
Brian> libmagick4-dev 19332 libmagick:
Brian> ldconfig-symlink-before-shlib-in-deb LI#67 [217]
Brian> ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott K. Ellis
I originally meant this mail to deb-dev to get feedback about this
issue, but it seems I did not.
Winfried Truemper writes:
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.10-17
>
>
> The version of fsck.ext2 segfaults in criticial cases (complete garbage on
> the harddisk, left from a previous crash).
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:19:30PM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> libmagick4-dev19332 libmagick: ldconfig-symlink-before-shlib-in-deb
> LI#67 [217] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott K. Ellis))
I wish I would understand a message like that. :-)
> libpgjava 27753 libpgjava: depends on jdk1.1-r
Hi,
I build packages with "build -rfakeroot". I get this:
lincity_1.10-4_i386.changes 1.9 kB #, ok (1 s, 1.94 kB/s)
announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED])... Unbalanced ')'
Goerzen)... User unknown
, failed ]
-- Generating marker debian/RELEASED
-- Package successfully released
Mark Bug# 16416, me
Hi,
>
> Therefore, I don't think this is laptop installation problems in
> general. I think that this may be specific to some laptops, but not all.
>
> -Seth
Agree.
If there were some Debian oriented database, where one could add his
experience about installation of Debian on some unu
Ola Joao,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
> "JC" == Joao Cardoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JC> I know nothing about copyrights, so I include none in the
JC> sources. My intention is that plplot_octave could be available
JC> in a future release of Octave, if Octave's author wants
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:49:19PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
>
> : Hi,
> :
> : > I have an IBM ThinkPad 380XD. I have found that 2.0.x kernels just don't
> : > work properly, my machine will crash or shutdown during boot. I believe
>
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
> This is my fault, I should have had more time to fix this (move it
> into non-free) with a new upload, but I don't know how to do this? File a
> bug against ftp.debian.org?
Just upload the package with section non-free/whatever, and it will be
taken care of
Hartmut Koptein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. binary-only NMUs breaks policity
> 2. every NMU must be with source
> 3. Porters needn't to ask maintainers for permission
> 4. a NMU fixes bugs; no need to forward this to the BTS or the maintainer
>
> ok for all ?
That would be a big
Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard.
> I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6...
2.x; we don't accept later stuff.
--
James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > binary-only MNU hits only one arch
> > normal NMU hits possible all archs=20
>
> A binary-only MNU violates the GPL, end of story.
FUD, FUD, FUD and more FUD. The source changes for our binary-only
NMUs are _always_ sent to the BTS.
Also, please get over this GPL
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
: Hi,
:
: > I have an IBM ThinkPad 380XD. I have found that 2.0.x kernels just don't
: > work properly, my machine will crash or shutdown during boot. I believe
that
: > the best thing that can be done to support laptops is to create boot
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 11:36:47AM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > "Dave" == Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dave> Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de
> Dave> facto standard. I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a
> Dave> number of people use 2.6.
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:19:30PM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> vrwave23436 vrwave should maybe go in contrib? [124] (Javier
> Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> xswallow 25932 Xswallow should be in contrib [55] (Javier
> Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROT
Hi,
> I have an IBM ThinkPad 380XD. I have found that 2.0.x kernels just don't
> work properly, my machine will crash or shutdown during boot. I believe that
> the best thing that can be done to support laptops is to create boot disks
> with 2.1.125 kernels. 2.1.125 works well on my laptop in e
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, David Welton wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:31:59PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > "What would you like to see on the first CD"?
>
> Why don't we look at what the most popular downloads have been? [...]
Good idea!
--
"1df9795f6d2984efc8f37c0f0fda9b32" (a truly random
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Martin Alonso Soto wrote:
masoto>to find anything wrong in the code. However, at a given time I added
masoto>some printf statements to the code (to print certain values the
masoto>debugger was not getting right) and the problem disappeared (!).
Th
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:31:59PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> "What would you like to see on the first CD"?
Why don't we look at what the most popular downloads have been? Some
Perl/Python type person ought to be able to parse them nicely, include
information about relative sizes of things,
Hi James,
> Who said they were bad? They are very rarely necessary however, since
> 99.5% of the time (the only exception I know of is Hartmut's packages)
yes, my packages are the only one that test masters scripts for non-i386
maintainer source uploads. :-)
This is now possible but it was not
> "Dave" == Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de
Dave> facto standard. I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a
Dave> number of people use 2.6...
Debian uses 2.6 for now. 5 is a bit incompatible with other versions,
> "Dave" == Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> I've been considering packaging snes9x, and was just
Dave> wondering whether it had already been done.
It's been done. :)
--
Brought to you by the letters Q and Z and the number 1.
"Ha ha! I have evaded you with the aid of th
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Philip Hands wrote:
> Is something like ``Anything with a priority of extra gets put on the second
> CD'' a reasonable guess ?
Only in part.
Some packages should definitely be on the first CD even if they are extra,
namely the ones that are extra because they conflict with
> If we call it something like a 'developer' release, or an 'early-access'
> release, then it sounds like a great idea, yes... as long as people don't
> get the impression that it is a full 2.1 release.
Ok, under this impression powerpc is ready to go.
I'll upload 2.1 kernel source and images
Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard.
I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6...
Cheers
Dave
I've been considering packaging snes9x, and was just wondering whether it
had already been done.
Also, are there any developers in the Southampton (UK) area? I could do
with someone to sign for me (no, I don't have access to a scanner).
Cheers
Dave
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Hurrying before the slink freeze, here is my intention
to package:
===
Package: octave-plplot
Version: 0.3-1
Section: math
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.0.7u),
> "Michael" == Michael Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Same things happens to me. Today I upgraded two things
Michael> sendmail and syslogd (what a coincidence! :). After few
Michael> minutes I found that `ps ax' shows a lot of sendmail
Michael> processes. Everyt
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 04:26:21PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I'm still amazed by the development of strace.. basically it's a nightmare
> to work on. Upstream version are _extremely_ rare and there are literaly
> dozens of patches floating around, but nobody collects them. I think
> Debian
Ok,
let us a little bit summarize:
1. binary-only NMUs breaks policity
2. every NMU must be with source
3. Porters needn't to ask maintainers for permission
4. a NMU fixes bugs; no need to forward this to the BTS or the maintainer
ok for all ?
If the answer is 'yes' i agree !
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:15:02AM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote:
> At 12:30 +0200 1998-10-14, Paul Slootman wrote:
> >On Mon 12 Oct 1998, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> >> :-) debian/i386 is also a port!
> >
> >No. For 90% (I think more) of the packages it is the primary architecture.
> >The word "port"
--On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 5:43 pm +0100 "Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hermes for mail (but you could use cus), with PGP support.
Doh.
Hermes *without* PGP support, I meant.
/+---+-\
| Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 4:46 pm +0100 "M.C. Vernon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I have a slight problem with PGP: I do my development on pick and can post
> from there (but don't) - all my email is done from cus (and I'm not sure
> if it can cope with PGP)
>
> So do I:
>
> po
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 05:56:42PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Is something like ``Anything with a priority of extra gets put on the second
> CD'' a reasonable guess ? or should we make a list of stuff to go on the
> second CD based on some sensible criteria (if anyone can think of some
> wit
Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> The last time I tried (about 10 sec. ago, on a.d.nl :-):
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/extra/home/debian/psl/kernel/linux/drivers/net'
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/extra/home/debian/psl/kernel/linux/include -Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strength-
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 09:33:22PM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay, everybody... It's that time again. I've gone through the bug logs
> > and made my list of packages to keep/remove should they still have
> > release-critical (i.e. critical, grave,
Craig Sanders wrote:
> On 15 Oct 1998, Paul Crowley wrote:
>
> > Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > anyone know what it is in slink which is enforcing idle-timeout and daily
> > > time limits on serial lines?
> >
> > I don't have this problem, and I haven't installed idled:
> >
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On 15 Oct 1998, Paul Crowley wrote:
>
> > Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > anyone know what it is in slink which is enforcing idle-timeout and daily
> > > time limits on serial lines?
> >
> > I don't have this problem, and I haven't
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > What do you think we should do with the Gnome stuff?
> >
> > The Gnome 0.30 stuff is still under rather heavy development. The
> > current packages in Slink are pretty much alpha-quality. Lots of
> > things don't work. It sounds like there will pro
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 09:33:22PM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
> What do you think we should do with the Gnome stuff?
Keep it in!
> The Gnome 0.30 stuff is still under rather heavy development. The
> current packages in Slink are pretty much alpha-quality. Lots of
> things don't work. It sounds lik
The following is quoted from the column Business Bulletin on the
front page of today's Wall Street journal, which is probably the most
widely read newspaper by corporate America:
'FREEWARE' STIRS debate while entrepreneurs find a nice niche.
Advocates prefer to call the free softwa
I have a slight problem with PGP: I do my development on pick and can post
from there (but don't) - all my email is done from cus (and I'm not sure
if it can cope with PGP)
So do I:
post from pick, and hope no-one sends me encrypted mail
or what?
I need to sort this out befo
On Friday 2 October 1998, at 11 h 55, the keyboard of Peter S Galbraith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To me, a uncompressed version of a file is still the same file.
> To me, copying an uncompressed info file to /usr/local/info *is* leaving
> crud all over the disk.
Yes, the current Debian system
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same problem here. I spent a little time trying to debug
> it, but never finished due to a lack of time. It might have something
> to do with gtk and themes, but I'm not sure.
Where are the segfaults happening? I found a pretty nasty one with
the
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 05:03:22PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I was told recently that people might be interested in some screenshots
> of the program. The following page contains three images.
>
> http://www.infodrom.north.de/~joey/Linux/Debian/gdselect.html
Does anyone else has the problem
On Thu 15 Oct 1998, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > There is one, MAJOR, huge, massive, 'program' which egcs will not
> > properly compile, this is the kernel, 2.0.x is officially not going to
> > operate 100% correctly when compiled with gcc 2.8.
On Thu 15 Oct 1998, J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 01:50:33PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > I last compiled (with success) 2.0.36pre2 with "gcc version egcs-2.90.29
> > 980515 (egcs 1.0.3 release)" (according to /proc/version). That works
> > perfectly with ISDN and all, and
On 14 Oct 1998, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
> Quick question: When two bugs are merged, do I need to close both
> or will one closing close both, and send a message to both the
> submittors?
The documentation for the bug system says:
[...] When reports are merged
opening, closing, marking or unmark
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> anyone know what it is in slink which is enforcing idle-timeout and daily
> time limits on serial lines?
>
> i've hunted all over (even to the point of grepping every file in /etc,
> /bin, /usr/bin, /sbin, /usr/sbin) for it and can't find it anywhere.
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 11:49:59PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> --On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 12:14 am +0200 "Christian Meder"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:05:25AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >> > "Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> Bri
--On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 1:12 pm +0200 "Christian Meder"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > * if there's a stabilized snapshot newbies will get (hopefully) a
>> > softer introduction in the wonders of the Linux-Sparc/Powerpc/Arm/...
>> world
>>
>>
>> I see your argument. I'm worried that we might be
On 15 Oct 1998, Paul Crowley wrote:
> Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > anyone know what it is in slink which is enforcing idle-timeout and daily
> > time limits on serial lines?
>
> I don't have this problem, and I haven't installed idled:
>
> Description: Idle Daemon. Removes id
> On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:19:30PM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > strace26065 strace confused about sigaction flags [51]
> > (Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> Hmm. Why is this bug important anyway? I've looked at the bug report and
> found no explanation.
Darn. I downgra
> > > Oh, i can generate a kernel-image_2.1.125-1_powerpc.deb along with source
> > > and dsc files and upload it to master, but will you and the other arch
> > > maintainer agree with this??
> >
> > If it's a powerpc package only, I don't see why there would be a problem.
> > It should get install
Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 04:59:42PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> > > Hmm, so I just updated the syslogd on my system yesterday (using
> > > dselect, slink 2.1 i386 system). Then I stopped receiving mail completely
> > > via qmail. About 4 h
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
