Are there any alternatives to rsync that don't use as much memory?
andrew 21911 0.6 19.5 24596 12252 ? S12:05 1:49 rsync
That's prettty high (and I've seen higher).. I think I will email the
author.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Hi,
my package ncpfs provides a shared library (libncp). When trying to
build using dpkg-buildpackage, debstd gives several errors about not
being able to find dependencies for the binaries in the package. The
problem goes away if I provide a shlibs.local file like this:
libncp 1 ncpfs (>=
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Jim Pick writes:
> > I must admit, I've been entirely negligent in following the policy
> > discussions - due to lack of time, I've skipped them entirely.
>
> Me too.
>
> > I suspect that most of the other "older" maintainers are the same way
> > - the
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 11:28:20AM -0400, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> I have been working on the xfstt package to take it over. Until a few
> days ago there was only one bug of "Wishlist" priority filed against
> it which is now ready to close as soon as I am able to upload
> files (ie am finished r
I'm having a problem sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
the host name doesn't have an MX record, and appears to have
a dynamic ip address. The mail relay being used
(mail.rdu.bellsouth.net) also doesn't appear to know anything
about this host name.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 01:52:25AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > I expect that everyone who has sent email to debian-devel this
> > weekend will have been unsubscribed.
>
> [Er... probably not everyone: the "too many bounces" mechanism
> probably won't knock off people who posted just a few times.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Joel Klecker, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
> less (332-2.1) frozen unstable; urgency=high
> .
> * Non-maintainer release.
I had thought I had uploaded this but I don't see it anywhere on
master. I guess it was part of the master problem? Exp
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems to me that we have accepted non-modified source as DFSG compliant
> > as long as modified binaries are not restricted.
>
> We allow exceptions to point 3, as long as point 4 is satisfied
> (explicit perm
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that we have accepted non-modified source as DFSG compliant
> as long as modified binaries are not restricted.
We allow exceptions to point 3, as long as point 4 is satisfied
(explicit permission to distribute software built from
modified so
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Jules Bean wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just installed apt_0.0.8. My impression is that it is significantly faster
> than dpkg-ftp. Could be pyschological, though ;)
No, it probably is. It advoids alot of the time consuming steps, read the
status file faster, and with HTTP downloads f
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm happy that we can work with this license, as we distribute diffs.
> > Thomas thinks otherwise. Thoughts?
>
> This license conflicts with point 3 of DFSG. We can't distribute
> modified versions under the s
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm happy that we can work with this license, as we distribute diffs.
> Thomas thinks otherwise. Thoughts?
This license conflicts with point 3 of DFSG. We can't distribute
modified versions under the same terms as the original.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSC
[ Forwarded to debian-devel to see what other people think. ]
The copyright for seyon says:
==
Seyon is Copyright (c) 1992 of Muhammad M. Saggaf. Seyon is not
public domain. Permission is granted to use and distribute Seyon
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *** interpre Opt blt2 2.1-6
>
Superseded by blt4.2, presumably.
> *** non-free Xtr ckermit 192-5
>
In project/orphaned, don't know why. Seems to be missin
Sorry if this has already been discussed but I have been away for a
week and off the list. I notice that the Packages file for
slink/main/binary-i386 is empty whereas binary-alpha, binary-powerpc,
and binary-sparc all look as I would expect them to. Is this a subtle
hint that I should switch arch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Manoj Srivastava) wrote on 03.05.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Sendmail configuration is tough but it is also the best documented
> >> MTA bar none!
Raul>> Please don't
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> picons packages (why are they marked obsolete)? What about ckermit?
Yes, I need a kermit, too.
> *** ?? sambades 1.9.17p2-1
This one is really obsolete since samba contains the relevant code now.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project
Does anyone object if I package UMB-Scheme (yet another scheme
distribution...). This package is needed if you want to play with much
of the Gnome-Project stuff...
-Brent
> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 1998 9:53 AM
> To: D
The auto-pgp package has been touched since November 1995, and has currently
seven open bugs filed against it.
If nobody objects, I will adopt auto-pgpt by uploading a version which
corrects the 7 bugs and updates the package from Debian 1.1 to Debian 2.0
standards.
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 04:35:28PM +0200, Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
> Anybody knows why dpkg-buildpackage jumps with a:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/hello/hello-1.3# dpkg-buildpackage
> no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("root") at
> /usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 16.
>
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You suddenly seem to be arguing that policy never be amended
> since we may just be screwing it up.
Er... no. Not even close.
Later,
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> The issue isn't trust. The issue is understanding.
I think I am willing to give new maintainers the benfit of
doubt as to whether they can excercise enough judgment to know if
they understand a subject well enough to go and
This may not be your problem, but when I get this error it means I am in
the debian/ directory and not in the root of the package. i.e
imlib-1.3/debian instead of imlib-1.3. Or in some other subdirectory.
When the builder statrs it looks in ./debian/{changelog,rules,control}
so if you are in de
what about /usr/share/ttf or /usr/share/ttfonts. My understanding is
that /usr/share is for any architecture independent data. This seems
appropriate.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anybody knows why dpkg-buildpackage jumps with a:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/hello/hello-1.3# dpkg-buildpackage
no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("root") at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line
16.
parsechangelog/debian: error: unable to open substvars file debian/substvars:
No ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> Hi,
> some time ago I expressed the intent to package fontinst
> (a TeX/LaTeX package). I asked the author about the licence
> and here's what I got. It is not DFSG but we *do* have latex
> in tetex. So is
I have been working on the xfstt package to take it over. Until a few
days ago there was only one bug of "Wishlist" priority filed against
it which is now ready to close as soon as I am able to upload
files (ie am finished registering as a debian package maintainer et al)
It now makes a pid file in
--On Mon, May 4, 1998 4:09 pm +0200 "Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
>>
>> I assume the point is that it will only execute applications listed in
>> /etc/mailcap, which is fine.
[chomp]
> It doesn't touch
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> I assume the point is that it will only execute applications listed in
> /etc/mailcap, which is fine.
>
> He didn't provide a URL, so I can't check..
>
> Jules
>
>
Sorry, I forgot. Im putting up a checksite at
ftp
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raul> You honestly think this is good enough for new developers? I
> Raul> must confess that I'm not really in touch with the sort of
> Raul> things they would think.
>
> Of course. You gotta trust people some time. I think we give
> folks the
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 03:22:42PM +0100, Martin Read wrote:
> Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a writes:
> This sounds distressingly like a serious security hole - unless it refuses
> requests resembling "xterm -e foo". It's not quite as bad as "xhost +",
> I'll admit, but it does sound like a majo
>I'm collecting names of those who have either emailled me or mentioned
>interest in seeing Debian a little easier on the novice user (but without
>getting annoying to the experienced user!) and will be in the next day or
>two trying to see if maybe we can get some projects organized to make
Debia
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 09:44:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> While we are talking about obsolete packages, what is the
> story on these? I mean, I would not like to just remove all the
> picons packages (why are they marked obsolete)? What about ckermit?
> How many of these ar
Martin Read wrote:
> Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a writes:
> > Xswallow is a plugin for Netscape that allows ANY X-based application
> > tu run inside Netscape. This allows you to run a VRML browser
> > (vrwave,vrweb..) or
> > a midi application inside Netscape without having to expressel
Hi,
While we are talking about obsolete packages, what is the
story on these? I mean, I would not like to just remove all the
picons packages (why are they marked obsolete)? What about ckermit?
How many of these are actually obsolete, and how many just have been
yanked from hamm?
-
--On Mon, May 4, 1998 3:39 pm +0100 "James Troup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Should the first two have been "Replaces: "'ed by their successors?
>
> Package: timezones
> [...]
> Conflicts: timezone
> Replaces: timezone
>
> Package: locales
> [...
--On Mon, May 4, 1998 3:22 pm +0100 "Martin Read"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a writes:
>> Xswallow is a plugin for Netscape that allows ANY X-based application
>> tu run inside Netscape. This allows you to run a VRML browser
(vrwave,vrweb..) or
>> a midi appli
--On Mon, May 4, 1998 6:38 am -0700 "Joel Klecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:24 +0100 1998-05-04, Jules Bean wrote:
>>The following packages on my system are in bo but not in hamm:
>>
>>--- Obsolete and local packages present on system ---
>>- Obsolete/local Required packages
X-URL: mailto:debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Mailer: Lynx, Version 2.4-FM
X-Personal_name: Sam
X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you please send me a link to download debian. I have looked for 3hrs.
Please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would be willing to say that we leave determination of the point
>> when following policy is detrimental to the package to the
>> maintainers themselves; so Dale could decide that strip
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a writes:
> Xswallow is a plugin for Netscape that allows ANY X-based application
> tu run inside Netscape. This allows you to run a VRML browser
> (vrwave,vrweb..) or
> a midi application inside Netscape without having to expressely save to disk
> and then run
At 12:24 +0100 1998-05-04, Jules Bean wrote:
>The following packages on my system are in bo but not in hamm:
>
>--- Obsolete and local packages present on system ---
>- Obsolete/local Required packages -
>--- Obsolete/local Required packages in section base ---
> *** Req
Xswallow is a plugin for Netscape that allows ANY X-based application
tu run inside Netscape. This allows you to run a VRML browser (vrwave,vrweb..)
or
a midi application inside Netscape without having to expressely save to disk
and then run it aside. It works with tags and /etc/mime.ty
Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a bit frustrated with hamm right now. As of just before hamm went from
> 'unstable' to 'frozen' almost every upgrade on my PC box 'breaks something'.
> I was literally 'spoiled' by the fact that during the last 6+ months of
> development under unstable
'From Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 04:19:31AM +, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 11:40:45PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > We are probably wasting everyone's time now by not looking to see just what
> > fetchmail/procmail interface actually i
I am one of those 'not a developer, hamm users'. I have been using 1PC type
and three 68k type Debian hamm boxes since sometime around the middle of
last year.
I am a bit frustrated with hamm right now. As of just before hamm went from
'unstable' to 'frozen' almost every upgrade on my PC box 'b
Mark W. Eichin wrote:
> someone on tcsh-dev found that bug - I sent in the particular patch as
> a bug report, but haven't heard anything (on this or on the
> history-lines 2*longer than the buffer problem either, though I
> haven't dug through and sent that upstream myself...)
TCSH was orphaned fo
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raul> I've mostly agreed with (Buddha and Philip's) statement you
> Raul> quoted a few days ago which talks about what to do when policy
> Raul> doesn't apply properly. I think it has a weakness: in creating
> Raul> the rules for how "debian-policy" is
G John Lapeyre wrote:
> Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > I recall there being a discussion on this some time ago, I just noticed on
> > master,
> Luis tried to upload a fix (from a debian maintainer) to chiark,
> but it got lost. I can't find it. Luis inquired about it a while ago and
> was i
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 07:34:10AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > SmartList removes addresses after it has received 4 bounces per list
> > per address. Sometimes it's confused though.
>
> I take it, SmartList isn't using VERP but is instead trying to
>
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SmartList removes addresses after it has received 4 bounces per list
> per address. Sometimes it's confused though.
I take it, SmartList isn't using VERP but is instead trying to
decipher the bounce message?
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Hi!
Just installed apt_0.0.8. My impression is that it is significantly faster
than dpkg-ftp. Could be pyschological, though ;)
The default apt sources.list doesn't include a reference to bo - and in any
case, since we're undergoing a symlink transition, I haven't been had bo in
my dselect for
Hi folks,
I'm sorry to say but new-maintainer acceptances are partially
stalled due to severe proplems on pgp.net the public pgp key
servers. They seem to drop newly added keys for at least two
weeks. After some more investigation from us the maintainers
are informed. I hope this will be fixed
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 01:34:35AM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
> I just was un-subscribed from debian-user for generating too many
> bounced mails. I have now problems with my mail. I have received some
> 400 e-mails in the last day and a half and sent around twenty. I work
> for the ISP, our mail serv
On Sat, May 02, 1998 at 09:43:42AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
:
: Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: > The discussions of the last days have shown me clearly, that I can't
: > implement my ideas WRT policy/QA anymore.
:
: > Therefore, I've decided to leave the Debian project.
:
: Sor
Hi,
some time ago I expressed the intent to package fontinst
(a TeX/LaTeX package). I asked the author about the licence
and here's what I got. It is not DFSG but we *do* have latex
in tetex. So is it right for main? Thanx, federico.
- Forwarded message -
The fontinst package is d
Jim Pick writes:
> I must admit, I've been entirely negligent in following the policy
> discussions - due to lack of time, I've skipped them entirely.
Me too.
> I suspect that most of the other "older" maintainers are the same way
> - they've skipped the policy discussions altogether - which woul
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Chris> Debian's [...] Chris> and adding the requirement for PGP (which I
> Chris> never needed before) plus my growing involvement in small start-up
> Chris> businesses (mostly Debian Linux based) have consumed all my time.
> FUD.
> I created PG
Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> Policy SHOULD be followed, in the general case. I'd even agree
Raul> that in a large number of specific cases (but not all), policy
Raul> MUST be followed. You're the one that has decided that this
Raul> means that it SHOULD NOT be foll
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I expect that everyone who has sent email to debian-devel this
> weekend will have been unsubscribed.
[Er... probably not everyone: the "too many bounces" mechanism
probably won't knock off people who posted just a few times.]
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just was un-subscribed from debian-user for generating too many
> bounced mails. I have now problems with my mail. I have received some
> 400 e-mails in the last day and a half and sent around twenty. I work
> for the ISP, our mail server is stable. Otherwi
I just was un-subscribed from debian-user for generating too many
bounced mails. I have now problems with my mail. I have received some
400 e-mails in the last day and a half and sent around twenty. I work
for the ISP, our mail server is stable. Otherwise our customers would
be ripping the door
Watch out, folks. There's something bogus going on with bounce handling,
and people may be dropping off the list due to problems in the bms.com
domain.
--
Raul
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> I recall there being a discussion on this some time ago, I just noticed on
> master,
There is a bit of dicussion on it in the bug system. I
corresponded with the debian mainainter (Luis Gonzales) and the upstream
author. They think it is a pretty tough problem.
On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 11:40:45PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are probably wasting everyone's time now by not looking to see just what
> fetchmail/procmail interface actually is...
>
> As I understand it, the fetchmail/procmail interface is a kludge.
No, actually it's a pipe.. =>
On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 11:45:24PM +0400, Amos Shapira wrote:
> |Sendmail configuration is tough but it is also the best documented MTA
> |bar none! The O'Reliey book alone on sendmail is 2 1/5" thick. Probably
> |close to everything that has ever been done with mail has been done with
> |sendma
>Could anyone tell me why premail is in non-free? I've read the license a
>couple of times, and I really don't see anything that would prevent it
> from=
>=20
>being in main (or at least contrib). Am I missing something?
>
> I see nothing that would make me object to its inclusion
On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 07:10:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Rev> How did you get sendmail to cooperate with dialup?
>
> What do you mean by cooperate? I send mail using sendmail
> whenever I want to. On up-up, I do a sendmail -q. I download messages
> using fetchmail. As to my send
'From Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
On Sat, May 02, 1998 at 11:39:44PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > 'From Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> >
> > I don't think so Jason...
> >
> > Fetchmail is also pretty robust about mail handling but i
'From Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
I don't see why either but it sure has not been done.
[snip]
> I don't see why it shouldn't be possible to make configuration just
> as easy for a dial-up case. We need to figure out what the typical dial-up
> cases look like and integrate them into the confi
Hi all.
I've noted that debian doesn't have the tool to manage the EQL
network device. After a bit of ftping I've found eql-1.2.tar.gz in
sunsite.unc.edu, compiled and tested it. Maybe eql is not very used
(I used it some years ago and it worked fine!), but anyway it's
silly to have EQL support i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are several problems with the packaging of enlightenment. It's
> menuing system is *not* easy to integrate with debian menu. This is simply
> because of the flexible and highly detailed syntax it uses. It is not
> modular in any way.
A prelimina
Could anyone tell me why premail is in non-free? I've read the license a
couple of times, and I really don't see anything that would prevent it from=
=20
being in main (or at least contrib). Am I missing something?
I see nothing that would make me object to its inclusion in main.
--
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> In any case, policy is not meant to be followed anyway.
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Raul> Cut it out, Manoj.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? You should be happy I'm on your side now. Were you not objecting
> to th
I have libc6 2.0.7pre3-1 installed. libc6-dev is unhappy -- all I can
find is the 2.0.7pre1-4 of it. apt is kinda of cure here. It wants to
remove my libc6-dev and all dependant packages (-: Glad I have it held.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Looks good. We have needed a progress meter for a long time. Cant wait
for the GUI !!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Test $DISPLAY, it's the Right Way to test for X.
On Sat, May 02, 1998 at 08:24:50PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > But not the right way to test for xterm.
Rev. Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If $DISPLAY is set you're either in an xterm, rxvt, or kvt. As far as ae
> would care,
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my opinion, sendmail is well documented *and* has lots of
> documentation. I also fail to find sendmail.cf obfuscatory -- but
> then, I have been writing sendmail.cf files since 1992.
Depends what you're trying to do, I suppose.
When I wan
[Sorry to be so late reading debian-devel. Please cc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> next time. I just don't always have time
to keep up on this list.]
Elie Rosenblum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Folks, make sure your prerm scripts don't fail if the install-docs doesn't
> want to uninstall docs that are
On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 07:38:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Rev> The script didn't deal with the fact that I didn't have a static
> Rev> IP/name.
>
> Hmm. I don't quite understand that -- I think I just had my
> machine set up as 127.0.0.2 or something (I could also have used
> 192
On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 10:41:10AM +0200, Hugo Haas wrote:
> > > root: The person who gets root's mail (also daemons', etc).
> > > This userid (on the mailhub) get all mail sent to
> > > local adressees with userids less than 10. In other
> > > words, she gets mail
Hi,
>>"Rev" == Rev Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rev> The script didn't deal with the fact that I didn't have a static
Rev> IP/name.
Hmm. I don't quite understand that -- I think I just had my
machine set up as 127.0.0.2 or something (I could also have used
192.168.1.10 or s
On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 12:54:20AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think I'm confused too thought that is not such an unusual state latesly...
> Fetchmail IS POP (or IMAP and somthing else but definately NOT smtp) for
> __getting__ the mail. It IS also smtp for handing the mail to the machine
On Sat, May 02, 1998 at 08:34:28PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I haven't looked at it. It's only 15k! That would be a really good
> > choice if it actually does the job. :-)
>
> One large problem with ssmtp is that it has no queueing. If you try to send
> mail offline, it gets lost.
Does ssmtp
On Sat, May 02, 1998 at 08:39:25PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > slrnpull should probably be seperated from slrn simply because there's
> > nothing in it that REQUIRES slrn other than that it puts things in
> > /var/spool/slrnpull (can be changed) and if you don't LIKE slrn you can
> > still have slr
> > [1] I don't why my system always reboots in "read-only" mode now;
>
> Umm, what kernel were you running before?
Debian 1.3, from a Walnut Creek CD-ROM dated late last year. It
was one of those "6-CD set!" deals; I bought the bundle so I could
install the best on my personal systems, yet sti
Hi,
>>"Rev" == Rev Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> manoj who is happy with sendmail and does have a dialup connection
>> and diald
Rev> How did you get sendmail to cooperate with dialup?
What do you mean by cooperate? I send mail using sendmail
whenever I want to. On up-up,
On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 11:27:29AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > smail is NASTY to configure over dialup links. And getting worse it seems.
> > I couldn't do it. sendmail is clearly not suited for the task.
> ^^^
>
> why?
>
> sen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 3 May 1998, Jules Bean wrote:
> --On Sun, May 3, 1998 5:26 pm +0100 "Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi there...
> >
> > Anyone out there already grabbed the enlightenment package, or have a
> reason
> > why it shouldn't be in slink? I
89 matches
Mail list logo
