[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> will NOT HAVE KILLALL. I think this is probably a Bad Thing.
>
> Two options:
> I merge the psmic into procps
> I create a new package called psmisc.
The second, and make procps recommend or suggest the new psmisc package.
--
see shy jo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM T
[I emailled the talk about procps and colors on debian-private, but on second
thoughts it probably should go here]
Ok, so I have patched procps so it now does colors, and compiles and works.
But, killall is no longer in procps. It is now part of a package called
psmisc. This was done by the aut
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 08:23:04PM +0100, Meskes, Michael wrote:
> libc5-dev for hamm??? And what's wrong with libc5 in hamm?
>
> IMO it's a waste of time to upgrade the bo version now that we're close
> to completing hamm.
No it's not. If we don't have a working libc5 for hamm people
can't upgr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eloy A. Paris) wrote on 01.01.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Kai Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : Well, when the original maintainer asked on -devel, I said that I'd take
> : it over, and I did. I have no idea why it landed on that list.
>
> Did you let the maintainer
> 18970 pacman_10-4.1_i386.deb Libc6! and doesn't segfault!
> There was an error in the source. A struct was referenced after it was freed.
> I am surprised that it worked on libc5. It should have segfaulted with that.
> Maybe that is a bug with libc5? I am in win right now,
What's going on is that we will have an alpha-testable system by the weekend
with any luck, and we can then set deadlines.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Actually, I'm not sure there is a problem with libc5-altdev. There definitely
is a dependency clash between libc5 and libc6, which David Engel thinks we
should patch by producing an upgrade for libc5. This will have to be installed
before hamm. It's not yet clear to me that we can make this automat
On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam> | On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 3:17:38 PM | Boris wrote about
Adam> "My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give me an
Adam> account on master!" > On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam>
Adam> Adam>> wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb
| On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 3:17:38 PM
| Boris wrote about "My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give
me an account on master!"
> On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam>> wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb Libc6! 88624 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i386.deb
Adam>> Libc6! New upstream version
On 1 Jan 1998, James Troup wrote:
Troup> > And if there was a deadline for me to convert my packages I
Troup> > would of made it.
Troup>
Troup> Ah of course; it's our fault for not setting a deadline. Silly
Troup> me.
Listen, I am not looking for somebody to blame. I am just saying:
On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam> wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb Libc6! 88624 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i386.deb
Adam> Libc6! New upstream version
I think I already told you. Xinetd is not orphaned, I am going to
release the libc6 package in a few.
thks,
borik
__
Boris D. Beletsky
| On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 10:34:00 AM
| Guy wrote about "My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give me
an account on master!"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
> It's going to get rejected if his key isn't in the keyring.
YEs, that is th
I'm sorry, but where's the problem with libc5-altdev?
Also, the kernel. I think we should do our best to get a 2.0.33 kernel
into hamm ASAP.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROT
libc5-dev for hamm??? And what's wrong with libc5 in hamm?
IMO it's a waste of time to upgrade the bo version now that we're close
to completing hamm.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[
Richard,
Is libc5-altdev OK in its present state?
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
> "adavis" == adavis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adavis> I was able to install using
adavis> --ignore-depends=linux-kernel-headers-2.0.32.
I had to do the similar thing, and found that I also had to update
the symlinks "/usr/include/{asm,linux}" by hand. I have the symlink
"/usr/
I started compiling libc5 with Ray Dassen's patch. It will probably
take a few hours to complete.
I changed the patch a bit more. I added the following lines to the
control entry for libc5-dev:
Conflicts: libc (<<4.6.27-11), libc-dev
Provides: libc-dev
Replaces: ppp (<<2.2.0f-22)
I took
Am 31.12.97 schrieb borik # isracom.net.il ...
Moin "Boris!
"BDB> Do we have any dates for Debian 2.0
"BDB> release/code-freze/dead-line/anything?
No.
"BDB> If not, shouldn't we schedule one already. What are we waiting for?
Are really good question. We should hurry a litte bit.
cu, Marco
--
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 05:58:30PM +, James Troup wrote:
> > > Oh really? What about such inessentials and trivialities such as
> > > our default MTA?
> >
> > Well... Please take a look at
> > ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/soenke/debian-beta/ and
> > test the smail inside.
>
> Woul
Kai Henningsen writes:
> Plus, dpkg isn't thorough enough with dependencies. This is what leads to
> dselect install-configure-remove-install-configure-remove cycles, and
> sometimes to installs breaking the system - dpkg doesn't take into account
> how dependencies etc. change during pac
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oh really? What about such inessentials and trivialities such as
> > our default MTA?
>
> Well... Please take a look at
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/soenke/debian-beta/ and
> test the smail inside.
Wouldn't that be better tested if it w
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 05:10:09PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Oh really? What about such inessentials and trivialities such as our
> default MTA?
Well... Please take a look at
ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/soenke/debian-beta/
and test the smail inside.
> > And if there was a deadline
Kai Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Well, when the original maintainer asked on -devel, I said that I'd take
: it over, and I did. I have no idea why it landed on that list.
Did you let the maintainer of the list (I think it was Phillipe Troin)
know you were taking maintenance of this p
Hi Marco,
On 31 Dic, Marco Budde wrote:
> Moin Moin!
>
> Today I've released the latest version of my HTML online help system for
> Debian. Bugs reports are welcome :).
>
> dhelp
I like it but...
1) How about dwww? (Yes, I know dwww needs a web server...)
Hi Adam,
> 418408 tkdesk_1.0b4-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
1.0b5 is out, and has some nice stuff added.
Why don't you package that?
> Please someone give me an account on master so that I can spread my work to
> the
> debian public.
Why dont you upload to chiark? If you PGP is in maintai
"Boris D. Beletsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Gee, I dunno, maybe it's, at least in part, for the developers who
> > still haven't upgraded their packages to libc6, despite it being
> > available since April.
>
> It will be available in the next few days,
Like Jed was going to be done "thi
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 07:08:44AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We need someone to do a non-maintainer upgrade of libc5-altdev, installing
> the patch in David Engel's mail. I'm busy with boot floppies. Can someone
> pretty please do this?
I've tried to, but it missed a description for the -d
Hi Adam,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Heath) wrote on 31.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | On Wednesday, 31 December 97, at 2:18:00 PM
> | Kai wrote about "My own Libc6 progress and package adoption drive, and I
> > need a mas" Hi Adam,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Heath) wrote on 31.12.97 in
> > <[EM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please be aware that the GIF patent issue is for WRITERS only. Readers
> do not use the patented algorithm. Often you can put the writer in non-free
> and leave the rest of the program in main.
Indeed.
The problem is the compression
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 07:34:00AM -0800, Guy Maor wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
>
> It's going to get rejected if his key isn't in the keyring.
He has already submitted his new-maintainer request. Please
wait until has been finished.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
It's going to get rejected if his key isn't in the keyring.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 16391 patch
Bug#16391: Patching the kernel leads to segmentation fault
Bug assigned to package `patch'.
> reassign 16439 general
Bug#16439: dselect removed nolonger available
Bug assigned to package `general'.
> merge 16440 16444
Bug#16440:
I apologize profusely for this posting. Here it goes again. Before I get
started, yes, I have read the nice mail from Linux about the kernel headers,
and I have respectfully read the many emails I have received on this topic
from thoughtful developers. But I am still confused. I am sorry, but I
Please pardon the cross-posting to two unrelated lists, but I'm not
sure if this is a mysql problem or a libc6 problem. I suspect the latter.
After working just fine with libc6-2.0.5c, I'm not able to compile
mysql under the new libc6-2.0.6 packages. The first noticable symptom
is that the configu
We need someone to do a non-maintainer upgrade of libc5-altdev, installing
the patch in David Engel's mail. I'm busy with boot floppies. Can someone
pretty please do this?
Also, it looks to me as if libc6 depends on versions of kernel-headers
and kernel-source that are _not_ in hamm at the moment.
OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
13526 bulkmail_1.6-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
34084 chord_3.6.1-1.1_i386.debLibc6!
9980dbview_1.0.3-3.1_i386.deb Libc6!
290268 defrag_0.70-3_i386.deb
25474 grmonitor_0.53-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
40024 lurkftp_0.99-1.1_i386.deb
288158 majord
On 30 Dec 1997, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
: From: "Mark W. Eichin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
: Date: 30 Dec 1997 22:04:51 -0500
: Subject: libnfslock (or dftp?) install dangerous...
:
: I was just upgrading a system from [hamm a few weeks old] to [hamm
: today] using, fo
After getting in touch with Michael Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the
current maintainer of netcat, I've decided to make a non-maintainer
release of netcat with the version 1.10-3.1. It should let us close all
the distribution-specific bug reports for that package:
* #5304: missing man page
39 matches
Mail list logo
