Package: mime-support
Version: 2.02-1
Downloads of .exe (DOS *sigh*) files doesn't work correctly
without it.
Thanks,
Martin
You (David Engel) wrote:
> Was this intended for me? If so, I don't remember seeing it before.
> Please remember that I've fallen of the -devel list and can't get back
> on.
Partly, I ment to contact you but somehow it slipped through. Oh well.
You still aren't back on debian-devel? Hmm.. I under
On Thu, 12 Sep 1996, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
> If you'd just like to convert the existing postscript files (which
> were formatted for A4 paper) to letter paper, then you can use:
>
> psresize -Pa4 -pletter < policy.ps > policy.letter.ps
Thanks Susan! The first example in the psresize manpage
Hi,
I noticed that in the rex/source archive there is currently only the
complete XFree-3.1.2 source tree. Are there any means to get ahold of
just the Debian specific diffs for it, even if they are quite a lot?
We need to get X11 for m68k debianized, but having to extract the changes that
were m
Hi,
there is one file in the rex/binary-m68k archive which has a wrong name
(base/tar_1.11.8-5_m68k.deb, where the _m68k is wrong). This is
probably so because it was moved in manually instead of being checked
in by Guy's scripts. Is it ok to manually rename this file, or will that
cause some othe
Miquel van Smoorenburg writes:
> You (Frank Neumann) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > there have been newer versions of these two programs out for some time
> > now:
> > gdb-4.16 (current in Debian: 4.15)
> > binutils-2.7 (current in Debian: 2.6)
> >
> > David, are you working on debianizing the newer versions?
Herbert> Package: apmd
Herbert> Version: 2.4-1
Herbert>
Herbert> The prerm script of the apmd package executes
Herbert>
Herbert> /etc/init.d/kerneld stop
Herbert>
Herbert> Instead, it should call
Herbert>
Herbert> /etc/init.d/apmd stop
Gosh, how ugly! I'll fix t
The same happens to messages sent by faxq:
Transcript:
---
Subject: your fax to 9808557
From: root (Fax Subsystem),\n
Your fax has been sent successfully at: \c
Fri Sep 13 15:06:51 MET DST 1996
\n\nJob / Log file:
phone 9808557
user joey
input faxtest.txt
pages f1.g3
Status Fri Sep 13 15:06:51 M
You (Frank Neumann) wrote:
>
> Hi,
> there have been newer versions of these two programs out for some time
> now:
> gdb-4.16 (current in Debian: 4.15)
> binutils-2.7 (current in Debian: 2.6)
>
> David, are you working on debianizing the newer versions? I'm pretty much
> interested in a newer bin
Package: apmd
Version: 2.4-1
The prerm script of the apmd package executes
/etc/init.d/kerneld stop
Instead, it should call
/etc/init.d/apmd stop
Regards
Herbert.
You (Bruce Perens) wrote:
> Who is doing the libc6 package? It would be interesting to see how
> much of our stuff builds and runs off of this, and how much trouble
> it has with shadow password, etc.
Me. On the Alpha, that is. It uses libc6 as its primary libc, and
the Alpha patches are 30% 64-bi
Package: mgetty
Version: 0.99-3
There is a useless '\n' in front of a line:
Transcript:
troi!joey(tty4):/tmp> faxspool 1234567 faxtest.txt
spooling to /var/spool/fax/outgoing/F02.1206...
spooling faxtest.txt...
faxtest.txt is format: ascii
Initializing... done.
Ghostscript 2.6.2 (4/19/95)
Co
On Fri, 13 Sep 1996, Mr Stuart Lamble wrote:
> Would it perhaps be reasonable to package up 4.2, and place it in the
> non-free section, especially considering that 4.3 (currently in beta
> test) will remove that condition?
It is ok to have multiple versions of a package in different
distribution
On Thu, 12 Sep 1996, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
>
> Hello. I would like to generate ps versions of the new
> policy and programmer manuals which are formatted for letter
> size. I notice that sgml2latex does not work on the .sgml
> files in the dpkg source, and that Ian uses a modified
> debiand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 23:44:04 +0200
Source: dupload
Binary: dupload
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
dupload- Utility to upload debia
Install the sources of the hello package and look at changelog, that's what
i did. Apparently the format is
() ;urgency=
*
*
--
with <..> to be replaced by the proper values.
Later,
Dominik
The text above is my personal opinion and does not reflect the official
position of my em
I've received a few emails since I took over vim, asking if vim 4.2
has yet been packaged in debian format. The stock response has been
that, since 4.2 introduced a condition - "distribute vim on a CD-ROM,
and you should/must send me a copy of that CD-ROM" - I decided not to.
Would it perhaps be r
Package: auctex
Version: 9.4g-1
Auctex installation fails on a fresh "rex" system as the line
(require 'tex-site.el)
is written to /etc/site-start.el. With emacs-19.34 and the new /etc/emacs/
directory, it should be written to /etc/emacs/site-start.el.
--
Dirk Eddelb"uttel
Hi Syrus --
You said:
>
> I would like to generate ps versions of the new
> policy and programmer manuals which are formatted for letter
> size. I notice that sgml2latex does not work on the .sgml ...
If you'd just like to convert the existing postscript files (which
were formatted for A4 paper
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.4.0
s/not// in programmer's manual 3.1.4:
Usually, neither of these fields should not be used unless removing a
package really will completely hose the system, making it impossible to
recover by (re)installing packages with dpkg.
Guy
Hello. I would like to generate ps versions of the new
policy and programmer manuals which are formatted for letter
size. I notice that sgml2latex does not work on the .sgml
files in the dpkg source, and that Ian uses a modified
debiandoc2html command. Ian, is there a debiandoc2latex
program av
Hi,
there have been newer versions of these two programs out for some time
now:
gdb-4.16 (current in Debian: 4.15)
binutils-2.7 (current in Debian: 2.6)
David, are you working on debianizing the newer versions? I'm pretty much
interested in a newer binutils, because the current Debian version doe
On 8 Sep 1996, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Maor) wrote on 05.09.96 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Is the essentialness of a package a sufficient condition for using
> > pre-depends?
>
> The difference in functionality between depends and pre-depends, as I
> understand it, ar
23 matches
Mail list logo
