Bug#4332: Vulnerability in the Xt library (fwd)

1996-09-03 Thread Owen Dunn
On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote: > Package: xlib > Version: 3.1.2-7 > > It seems there is a buffer overrun in libXt, which may be a security > hole (some programs using libXt, such as xterm, are setuid root). > I haven't tried to exploit it, but xterm -fg very_long_string > segfaul

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-03 Thread Stuart Lamble
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) wrote: [snipped] >Ouch! > >What I object to is another question in the postinst. I installed several >Debian systems last week, and there were too many questions - the effect >was that you could not let the installation run unattended. What's worse, >some maintaine

Bug#4390: xpdf doesn't set itself up to be launched

1996-09-03 Thread Michael Shields
Package: xpdf Version: 0.5-0 Until adding the appropriate entries to ~/.mime.types and ~/.mailcap, Mosaic does not know to launch xpdf for a PDF file. It would be nice if the postinst added this to /etc/mime.types and /etc/mailcap. -- Shields, CrossLink.

Re: shlibdeps

1996-09-03 Thread Owen Dunn
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >Are we supposed to use dpkg-shlibdeps for all dependecies upon shared libs? I believe so, yes. >Or is it just for the three (or so) installed in /etc/dpkg/shlibs.default? Ian will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think (under the New Scheme of Things) pac

Re: Checking on possible bug in mt...

1996-09-03 Thread Brian Mays
> Rob Browning writes: Rob> I'm trying to decide if this is a bug in mt, or my relative Rob> inexperience with tape drives. If it's a bug I'll report it, Rob> and it'll probably have to go to the upstream maintainers. Rob> # mt --file /dev/nst0 tell Rob> mt: /dev/nst0: Fu

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-03 Thread Bruce Perens
Bruce: > Let's please not add unnecessary questions in the postinst. > I think /usr/local should be a symbolic link to /local, but it should > always exist. From: Dominik Kubla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > We will not gain anything with this! I am sure if you think about it > you will recognize that this

Re: 96 New Debian i386 Packages

1996-09-03 Thread Guy Maor
On Sun, 1 Sep 1996, Michael Meskes wrote: > 'Distribution: experimental' means unstable, doesn't it? Or do you really mean > the experimental subtree under project? No, `experimental' means the experimental subtree under project. `unstable' is unstable. Guy

Bug#4190: serious security hole in libc (resolver)

1996-09-03 Thread David Engel
On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote: > David Engel wrote: > > About the best I can do, without further guidance, is make libc not > > echo the problem lines to stderr. Is that acceptable? > > I'm not sure. Someone could still read special files as root > (they would not see the conten

Bug#4384: gcc_2.7.2.1-1.deb & g77_0.5.18-2.deb incompatible

1996-09-03 Thread joost witteveen
Alan (g77 maintainer) writes: > > I'm planning to do a new release of g77 which will include the gcc source to > try > and solve this problem. The idea was suggested to me by Joost. The > fundamental Probably you are right, but I don't quite understand what you mean. At the moment, gcc is g7

Bug#4378: incomplete Packages files and incomplete distributions

1996-09-03 Thread Guy Maor
On Mon, 2 Sep 1996, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Right now, the contrib and non-free trees are, by definition, "unstable" > since they aren't frozen at release time. I don't think this is very nice > for folks who are trying to run "latest stable" bits all the time. There are prominent notices in both

New X Set-Up

1996-09-03 Thread Bruce Perens
The XF86 3.1.2F set-up needs the VGA server and TCL/TK to run. Bruce

Bug#4389: your mail

1996-09-03 Thread llucius
On Tue, 3 Sep 1996, Milan Hodoscek wrote: > > in debian/rex/base dialog package has wrong Package entry (misc) > I will be fixing this when I repackage Dialog with the new standards. Thanks, Leland __ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth! oo o oo o o |

Bug#4386: debian/rex/texbin_3.1415-5.deb is missing manfnt.mf file

1996-09-03 Thread llucius
On Tue, 3 Sep 1996, Milan Hodoscek wrote: > > In texbin_3.1415-5.deb there is a request for manfnt.mf font which is > not there. I linked it to some other file and then dpkg -i works fine. > This was corrected with the latest mfbasfnt (1.0-5). I would think it to be at the mirrors since the up

shlibdeps

1996-09-03 Thread Michael Meskes
Are we supposed to use dpkg-shlibdeps for all dependecies upon shared libs? Or is it just for the three (or so) installed in /etc/dpkg/shlibs.default? So what do I do with xpm for instance? Michael -- Michael Meskes |_ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// __

Bug#4387: mirror doesn't provide do_unlinks as executable

1996-09-03 Thread Dirk . Eddelbuettel
Martin> Package: mirror Martin> Version: 2.8-6 [...] Martin> The Debian mirror package only provides this script as an example. Martin> I would appreciate movin it into the /usr/lib/mirror direcotory and Martin> linking it to /usr/bin/do_unliks. No, because you need to first edit do_de

Bug#4384: gcc_2.7.2.1-1.deb & g77_0.5.18-2.deb incompatible

1996-09-03 Thread Alan Bain
I'm planning to do a new release of g77 which will include the gcc source to try and solve this problem. The idea was suggested to me by Joost. The fundamental problem is that g77 requires gcc to be g77 aware, and this changes with the versions of gcc. At the moment I'm not in the best position

Bug#4254: msql config problems

1996-09-03 Thread Martin Schulze
Hallo Brian! }Version: 1.0.16-2 } }After upgrading from v1.0.14... I have tried this, too, but haven't had any problems. }The /var/log/msql directory is: } }drwxr-x--- 2 operator msql 1024 Aug 23 15:11 /var/log/msql/ } }It should be owned by "root.msql" and have the permissions "775".

Bug#4388: emacs mail-mode fails RFC822 section 3.4.7

1996-09-03 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Package: emacs Version: 19.34-2 I'm using Emacs under X and font-lock mode is turned on. If you write `cc:' or `Cc:' in the headers it appears in black (or the default face); however if you write `CC:' then it appears in purple. However, RFC822 headers are case-independent, so it should be the s

Bug#4387: mirror doesn't provide do_unlinks as executable

1996-09-03 Thread Martin Schulze
Package: mirror Version: 2.8-6 If you configure your mirror to be careful with deletes (e.g. max_delete=20%) you might get the following messages: NEED TO unlink /pub/buzz-fixes/disks-i386/1996_7_14/kernel-headers-2.0.6-0.all.deb NEED TO unlink /pub/buzz-fixes/disks-i386/1996_7_14/kernel-image-

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-03 Thread Dominik Kubla
Dear Bruce, you wrote: > Let's please not add unnecessary questions in the postinst. > I think /usr/local should be a symbolic link to /local, but it should > always exist. We will not gain anything with this! I am sure if you think about it you will recognize that this will just shift the prob

Bug#4297: msql 1.0.16 cannot connect to remote DBs

1996-09-03 Thread Martin Schulze
Hallo Brian! }When I try to run any of the msql programs, it fails to connect to remote }databases. Connecting to these from a 1.0.14 client works fine. } }$ relshow -h gate }Connect: Connection refused Could you please give me more information? What you gave me, isn't enough. I work with the m

Bug#4386: debian/rex/texbin_3.1415-5.deb is missing manfnt.mf file

1996-09-03 Thread Milan Hodoscek
In texbin_3.1415-5.deb there is a request for manfnt.mf font which is not there. I linked it to some other file and then dpkg -i works fine. -- Milan Hodoscek (http://www.ki.si)

Bug#4385: (no subject)

1996-09-03 Thread Milan Hodoscek
in debian/rex/base dialog package has wrong Package entry (misc) $ dpkg -I dialog_0.9a-5.deb new debian package, version 2.0. size 64034 bytes: control archive= 789 bytes. 1277 bytes,23 lines control Package: dialog Version: 0.9a-5 Architecture: i386 Section: mi

Bug#4384: gcc_2.7.2.1-1.deb & g77_0.5.18-2.deb incompatible

1996-09-03 Thread Milan Hodoscek
gcc_2.7.2.1-1.deb & g77_0.5.18-2.deb are incompatible. g77 package puts f771 compiler to the /2.7.2 directory instead to .../2.7.2.1 Milan

Re: Shared libraries and symbols

1996-09-03 Thread Michael Meskes
Hi Dominik, > > /lib/libc.so.5.4.4: no symbols > > This is most certainly a bug! Why? It works without a problem. I got this libc by using David's Debian files with HJ's sources. > Try debug a dynamically linked binary using gdb and you will see lots of > messages about loading symbols from the

Re: /usr/local (again)

1996-09-03 Thread Bruce Perens
> At installation time ask the installer where the local directory is > located and make create a link /etc/local/ to the location > given by the installing person. Let's please not add unnecessary questions in the postinst. I think /usr/local should be a symbolic link to /local, but it should alw