Unanswered problem reports by date

1996-08-30 Thread Ian Jackson
The following problem reports have not yet been marked as `taken up' by a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or or `forwarded' by a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OVER 17 MONTHS OLD - ATTENTION IS REQUIRED: Ref PackageKeywords/Subject Package maintainer 660 gdbGDB gets addr

Re: CC's on this mailing list

1996-08-30 Thread Chris Fearnley
'Lars Wirzenius wrote:' > >Spam does make furious, extra Cc's from mailing lists don't. They >just annoy me (see signature), and in theory they do cost me a bit. >Not enough to make me worry about it, but enough to write kilobyte after >kilobyte about it. > >I do wish that people wouldn't Cc me whe

Bug#4349: dpkg-source has misleading warning message

1996-08-30 Thread Owen Dunn
Package: dpkg Version: 1.3.9 sfere:~$ dpkg-source -b procmeter-2.0 procmeter-2.0.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: warning: .orig.tar.gz name procmeter-2.0.orig.tar.gz is not -.orig.tar.gz (wanted procmeter_2.0.orig.tar.gz) This should read `... is not _.orig.tar.gz ...' (S)

Re: dpkg-buildpackage and -source questions

1996-08-30 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Fri, 30 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote: > If you get this message: > > dpkg-source: error: tarfile `./exmh_1.6.9.orig.tar.gz' contains object with > newline in its name > (exmh-1.6.9.orig/?exmh-1.6.9.orig/exmh.README?exmh-1.6.9.orig/COPYRIGHT?exmh-1.6.9.orig/e...(rest > of output deleted) > >

Bug#4348: smartlist.postinst fails

1996-08-30 Thread Christoph Lameter
Dont know what kind of "hostname" tool you got installed on your machine. It works on my Debian 1.1 system. On Fri, 30 Aug 1996, Douglas Bates wrote: bates>Package: smartlist bates>Status: install ok half-configured bates>Priority: optional bates>Section: mail bates>Maintainer: Christoph Lameter

Bug#4348: smartlist.postinst fails

1996-08-30 Thread Douglas Bates
Package: smartlist Status: install ok half-configured Priority: optional Section: mail Maintainer: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version: 3.10-1 Depends: smail | sendmail | mail-transport-agent, procmail, libc5 (>= 5.2.18-1) Description: Versatile and Fast List Processor -- Clip here

Bug#4346: Essential LaTeX style files missing

1996-08-30 Thread Dirk . Eddelbuettel
Thomas> Package: ltxmisc Thomas> Version: 1.0-1 Thomas> Thomas> In 1.1.7, Debian's TeX is unusable for somebody who wants to do Thomas> serious work with it, at least for me (I work in German). Hardly Thomas> any of the often - used packages is there (this starts with a4.sty, Th

Bug#4347: emacs html-mode + font-lock highlights too greedily

1996-08-30 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Package: emacs Version: 19.31-2 I have the following line in an HTML document: deny_sender in the restrict.options file and the email However when font-lock mode is turned on, everything from deny_sender to restrict.options is highlighted, whereas the right to do is to only highlight the con

Re: New virtual package names.

1996-08-30 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 30 Aug 1996, Mark Eichin wrote: > > Emacs also has conditions > > where it calls an outside editor... > > Interesting. I'm aware of cases where it will call outside *viewers* > (mostly mime/web stuff) but I can't think of what outside editors it > would call. Could you perhaps expand on thi

Bug#4346: Essential LaTeX style files missing

1996-08-30 Thread Thomas Koenig
Package: ltxmisc Version: 1.0-1 In 1.1.7, Debian's TeX is unusable for somebody who wants to do serious work with it, at least for me (I work in German). Hardly any of the often - used packages is there (this starts with a4.sty, which is required by the documentation of german.sty, missing). The

Re: dpkg-buildpackage and -source questions

1996-08-30 Thread Ian Jackson
If you get this message: dpkg-source: error: tarfile `./exmh_1.6.9.orig.tar.gz' contains object with newline in its name (exmh-1.6.9.orig/?exmh-1.6.9.orig/exmh.README?exmh-1.6.9.orig/COPYRIGHT?exmh-1.6.9.orig/e...(rest of output deleted) You should upgrade your cpio. Unfortunately the (Debian

metamail_2.7-8 corrected

1996-08-30 Thread Michael Meskes
Just in case someone checks the md5sums in this announcement here's the correct one: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.5 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 17:11:43 +0200 Source: metamail Binary: metamail Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.7-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mich

sudo_1.5-1

1996-08-30 Thread Michael Meskes
Now that I finished this version, Bdale take over sudo. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.5 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 11:44:22 +0200 Source: sudo Binary: sudo Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Descript

metamail_2.7-8

1996-08-30 Thread Michael Meskes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.5 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 17:11:43 +0200 Source: metamail Binary: metamail Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.7-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: metamail - An implementation of MIME.

Bug#4339: no free pine package available

1996-08-30 Thread Buddha Buck
> I rarely use pine myself (usually only when I have to read some > MIME-encrypted mail :-), but I know it's quite popular. It would > be a pity if we can't ship a MIME-aware mailer with the standard > distribution. How odd... I seem to have a /usr/bin/exmh, and exmh isn't in my /usr/local/bin.

Re: Do we ever retire packages?

1996-08-30 Thread Guy Maor
On 29 Aug 1996, Kai Henningsen wrote: > So, I'd propose a new directory, parallel to contrib and non-free. We > could call it "dropped" or "orphaned" and include a README saying that > these are packages that are no longer supported by the Debian project in > any way, and are not recommended

Bug#4331: linux-security] [linux-alert] SECURITY FIX/UPDATE: anonftp (fwd)

1996-08-30 Thread Marek Michalkiewicz
> AFAIK it is along the line wit > > "site exec tar cvzf -rsh-command blafasel host:tar.tgz" Probably something else - I don't believe Red Hat would have that nice old _PATH_EXECPATH bug for so long :-). It might be related to the feature that wu-ftpd can send you a tar of a directory if you do

Bug#4341: no man page

1996-08-30 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Package: hello Version: 1.3-11 there is no man page. ok, i don't need a man page for hello, and there is a big info file, but as far as i understand debian, a missing man page is considered a bug. :-) Regards, Andreas

Bug#4344: trn should provide news-reader

1996-08-30 Thread Michael Shields
Package: trn Version: 3.6-5 trn should provide the virutal package `news-reader'. -- Shields, CrossLink.

uploading gs-4.01-4

1996-08-30 Thread joost witteveen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Date: 29 Aug 96 21:19 UT Format: 1.6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: Low Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source: gs Version: 4.01-4 Binary: gs Architecture: i386 source Description: gs: Postscript interpreter with X11 and svgalib preview suppo

Bug#4342: pgp command : add '+clearsig=on'

1996-08-30 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Package: dpkg Version: 1.3.10 you should add +clearsig to the pgp paramterers (pgp is callen when i start dpkg-buildpkg). on my system, pgp doesn't create clear sigs, and changing /etc/pgp-i.conf doesn't help. but that's a diffrent problem. dpkg should use +clearsig in any case, because it doesn'

Bug#4334: squid should not run as root by default

1996-08-30 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
You (Marek Michalkiewicz) wrote: > Package: squid > Version: 1.0.beta16-1 > > In the default configuration, squid runs as root. While it can be > changed in the config file, someone might forget to configure it > after installation, so I think the default should be secure. The > permissions/owne

Bug#4190: serious security hole in libc (resolver)

1996-08-30 Thread Marek Michalkiewicz
David Engel wrote: > About the best I can do, without further guidance, is make libc not > echo the problem lines to stderr. Is that acceptable? I'm not sure. Someone could still read special files as root (they would not see the contents, but merely reading them might sometimes cause troubles t

Bug#4339: no free pine package available

1996-08-30 Thread Guy Maor
On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote: > The current version of pine is in non-free because the copyright > is not clear. The onus rests on the pine maintainer, not me, so I'm reassigning this to pine. Guy

new maintainer for wu-ftpd wanted

1996-08-30 Thread Peter Tobias
Hi, I'm searching for a new maintainer for the wu-ftpd package. You should be able to program in perl (addftpuser is written in perl). Thanks, Peter -- Peter TobiasEMail: Fachhochschule Ostfriesland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fachbereich Elektrotechni

Bug#4339: no free pine package available

1996-08-30 Thread Marek Michalkiewicz
Dale Scheetz wrote: > The copyright is quite clear. You can not distribute this package for a > fee without first getting permission from the pine developers. According > to our policy this requires it go into non-free. Now I noticed that the copyright has changed, the new one (same in version 3.9

Bug#4190: Bug4190: serious security hole in libc (resolver)

1996-08-30 Thread David Engel
This is why I really wish H.J. Lu would make pure, bug-fix only releases for the current, stable libcs. Yes, I know Debian isn't using the latest, stable libc, but this paritcular bug isn't fixed in the current beta version either. Marek Michalkiewicz writes: > I think there are two possible ways

Bug#4343: ssh binaries are not stripped

1996-08-30 Thread Marek Michalkiewicz
Package: ssh Version: 1.2.14-1 The binaries in this package are not stripped, and they should according to the packaging guidelines. Marek

Re: Bug#4339: no free pine package available

1996-08-30 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > > The current version of pine is in non-free because the copyright > is not clear. We really should talk to the maintainers - perhaps > we can get permission to distribute the package as part of the > distribution? (FYI

gs-3.33 + gsfonts

1996-08-30 Thread joost witteveen
Please blame me for all of this, and not the archive maintainer, but if you try to install gs-3.33 from the unstable tree, (the GNU version of gs), you'll notice it depends on gsfonts-4.01. Next you'll notice, gsfonts is in non-free and you cannot install it (as you're a "pure-gnu"). Fortunately,