I have been off-line since Wednesday night, sorry if you've been trying to
reach me. I got a middle ear infection that deleted my sense of balance for
most of Thursday. I'm still a bit woozy today. I'll never ignore a sore throat
or earache again.
Bruce
--
Clinton isn't perfect, but
Hi,
I think it was on debian-devel that somebody asked about this subject. I
replied that I had a rather simple setup using the .xserverrc-file, and a
couple of people asked me to mail it to them. So I decided to send it to
the list. Here it follows:
#!/bin/sh
# Generate a random key; Mui and Pe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Douglas Bates writes:
>so after running /sbin/psupdate there is an attempt to find if
>/boot/psdatabase-2.0.12 exists. The documentation for psupdate
>indicates that it writes a new version of /etc/psdatabase. I checked
>and indeed that file was updated. Am I supp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Miquel van Smoorenburg writes:
>Which reminds me: RedHat is going to integrate PAM into their next release.
>Perhaps now is a good time to look if we should consider using that too,
>or if we think that shadow is good enough for now.
Someone's already compiled libpa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>> echo $HOME/Mailbox >$HOME/.forward
>
>Richard Kettlewell:
>>This is a bad idea if the home directory is NFS-mounted from a remote
>>system; IME file locking under NFS is very easy to get wrong. (Not
>>that all mailers get locking right even on local file systems.
Package: kernel-package
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: misc
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: kernel-package
Version: 2.03
Depends: perl (>= 5.002-8)
Recommends: libc-dev, gcc
Suggests: kernel-source
I am installing a custom kernel using kernel-pack
You (Michael Meskes) wrote:
> I'm currently trying to finish the work on the shadow package. However,
> there are some decision to make:
>
> 1) Should we change the login package to be shadow aware? Or should shadow
> come with its own login (that works with and without shadow password files)?
> O
I'm currently trying to finish the work on the shadow package. However,
there are some decision to make:
1) Should we change the login package to be shadow aware? Or should shadow
come with its own login (that works with and without shadow password files)?
Or should we use the shadow login as stan
As of 1.14.6-4, this bug is still there... maybe
$ type echo
echo is a shell builtin
$ echo foo >/dev/full
$ echo $?
0
$ cat /dev/zero >/dev/full
cat: write error: No space left on device
$ echo $?
1
$ /bin/echo foo >/dev/full
$ echo $?
0
$ file /bin/echo
/bin/echo: ELF 32-bit LSB executable,
I'm looking at the backlog of forgotten bugs, and have verified that
this one still exists.
The original report was for gdb 4.12, but Ian Jackson verified
that the problem exists under 4.14, and I just verified that it
exists for 4.15.1-1.
Should this be forwarded to the upstream maintainers of g
The following problem reports have not yet been marked as `taken up' by a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or or `forwarded' by a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OVER 16 MONTHS OLD - ATTENTION IS REQUIRED:
Ref PackageKeywords/Subject Package maintainer
660 gdbGDB gets addr
Luckily I can provide you with a patch:
diff -Nur orig/nn-6.5.0.b3.linux.1.1/db.c nn-6.5.0.b3.linux.1.1/db.c
--- orig/nn-6.5.0.b3.linux.1.1/db.c Thu Nov 25 10:39:33 1993
+++ nn-6.5.0.b3.linux.1.1/db.c Sat Aug 17 00:46:41 1996
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@
actfp = nntp_fopen_list("LIST");
} else
Package: grep
Version: 2.0-5
Reproduce by:
# grep foo /proc/kcore
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
While grepping on /proc/kcore is something you would not ordinarily
do, grep should still not dump core. I originally stepped on this
with "find / | xargs grep foo".
Sys
Package: nn
Version: 6.5.0.b3.linux.1.1-01
Debian's INN has its active file located in /var/lib/news/active.
The nn newsreader mentioned above unfortunately tries to read it
from /usr/lib/news/active.
Here's an strace excerpt:
wazergate!joey:~> strace nn
[...]
uname({sys="Linux", node="wazergat
Uploaded to master.debian.org.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 16 Aug 96 21:05 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Robert Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: zsh
Version: 3.0.0-1
Binary: zsh
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
zsh: A shell with lots of f
Hi,
this is not a bug. Due to copyright reasons the dc fonts, which use
the T1 encoding, are no more in the mflib package. You got to get the
package "mfdcfnt_1.0-1_all.deb"; It's on "Incoming/" right now (at
least in our mirror here).
Ciao, Emilio.
> "RK" == Richard Kaszeta <[EMAIL PROTECT
16 matches
Mail list logo
