On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:18:23 +0200
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On 03/30/2016 02:55 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > IME it's much easier to automate using VMs if possible, but I'm open
> > to being convinced otherwise.
>
> Sure, but how do I get a new VM for it? Should I write a mail t
Hi Steve,
On 03/30/2016 02:55 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> IME it's much easier to automate using VMs if possible, but I'm open
> to being convinced otherwise.
Sure, but how do I get a new VM for it? Should I write a mail to dsa@ ?
Not sure if you want more insights here, but I'll give them (as m
On Wed, Mar 30 2016, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Manoj wrote:
>>On Tue, Mar 29 2016, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> And, to make it more explicit, we're also happy/willing/wanting to get
>>> more people involved in the production of the images that we
>>> ship. Again, the "CD" team name is a really bad one
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:55 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >On 03/25/2016 11:31 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> * 3rd September: Requirements agreed for a test suite for cloud images
> >>
> >>To make sure that the images we're producing are sane with
> >>reasonable qu
Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 03/25/2016 11:31 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> * 3rd September: Requirements agreed for a test suite for cloud images
>>
>>To make sure that the images we're producing are sane with
>>reasonable quality, we'll be running tests on them. We'll need to
>>agree wh
Manoj wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 29 2016, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> And, to make it more explicit, we're also happy/willing/wanting to get
>> more people involved in the production of the images that we
>> ship. Again, the "CD" team name is a really bad one by now!
>
>Raises hand.
Woot, thanks!
O
On Tue, Mar 29 2016, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> And, to make it more explicit, we're also happy/willing/wanting to get
> more people involved in the production of the images that we
> ship. Again, the "CD" team name is a really bad one by now!
Raises hand.
Manoj
--
Got a dictionar
Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
>The people who do the work of building official release images at
>release time _is_ the "CD" team, so those who want to have images for
>their pet cloud providers built together with the other official images
>at release time and distributed through the regular Debian ch
Charles Plessy wrote:
>Hi Richard and Steve,
>
>So according to Richard, the issue is "How can Debian ensure that cloud images
>a user might use are proper Debian?" and the solution is that "trademark team
>asked the CD team if they would be willing to become a gatekeeper of sorts".
>
>Concretely,
Hi Steve,
On 03/25/2016 11:31 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> * 3rd September: Requirements agreed for a test suite for cloud images
>
>To make sure that the images we're producing are sane with
>reasonable quality, we'll be running tests on them. We'll need to
>agree what should be test
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> here are quick answers, but I will then run out of time and I am not sure
> to be able to continue the discussion on that pace in the next few days
> (which may be a good thing).
>
> Le Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 08:48:22AM -0700,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 01:29:08AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Your main concern seems to be that you will be forced to conform to an
> > arbitrary rule-set enforced top-down.
>
> My main concern is that what is being done is a strong departure from what I
> felt is a core Debian value: the p
Hi Richard,
here are quick answers, but I will then run out of time and I am not sure
to be able to continue the discussion on that pace in the next few days
(which may be a good thing).
Le Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 08:48:22AM -0700, Richard Hartmann a écrit :
>
> all teams are well within their dele
Hi Charles,
all teams are well within their delegations. If the DPL had felt that
to not be the case, I am sure he would have updated them accordingly
or created a new one.
Our main concern is that we need a way to protect our users from
unexpected behavior in a somewhat automated and scalable ma
Hi Richard and Steve,
So according to Richard, the issue is "How can Debian ensure that cloud images
a user might use are proper Debian?" and the solution is that "trademark team
asked the CD team if they would be willing to become a gatekeeper of sorts".
Concretely, the "CD team" is Steve. I st
Hi Charles,
Charles Plessy wrote:
>Le Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:31:26PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>>
>> We have a few requirements agreed for such images to be
>> classed as *official* (i.e. blessed and released by Debian), and one
>> of these is that they should be built on Debian hardware,
Hi Charles
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:41:06PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Latly, who are the decision makers, shouldn't it be the ones who does the work
> ? If the "CD team" has not been producing cloud images in the past, why is it
> getting suddenly such a central role ?
Please read
https:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am still puzzled where this requirement comes from. Can you clarify who
> is "we" ?
This most likely includes the teams listed above, the DPL, and the
attendees of the respective BoF at DC15.
> Can you also explain in more details wha
Le Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:31:26PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>
> We have a few requirements agreed for such images to be
> classed as *official* (i.e. blessed and released by Debian), and one
> of these is that they should be built on Debian hardware, controlled
> by the (increasingly inaccu
Hi folks,
There's been some discussion between various teams (the trademark
team, the CD team and debian-cloud people) about what should be done
to enable production of official Debian images for various cloud
platforms. We have a few requirements agreed for such images to be
classed as *official*
20 matches
Mail list logo
