Bug#425093: Fix imminent

2007-07-18 Thread Neil Williams
libeventdb2 and libgpevtype1 have now been uploaded to Debian (thanks, Moray) and I'm just waiting for libgpevtype1 to move out of Incoming before completing gpe-calendar 0.90. I expect to upload tomorrow or Friday this week. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://ww

Bug#416731: marked as done (depends on non-essential package initramfs-tools in postrm)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416731: fixed in bootcd 3.07 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#433608: bug-triage: missing dependency on python-glade2

2007-07-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: bug-triage Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious $ bug-triage Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/bug-triage", line 32, in ? import ui.gtk.core File "/usr/share/bug-triage/ui/gtk/core.py", line 22, in ? import gtk.glade ImportError: No module named glade $ -- Syst

Bug#321676: marked as done (Dummy bug; emacs-snapshot is not for testing)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:45:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#433505: sun-java5-jre_1.5.0.12-1 missing dependency sun-java5-bin_1.5.0.12-1 in amd64

2007-07-18 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 433505 wishlist thanks please stop filing crap reports like this one. The only reason that the package is currently not installable is that it is not yet built by a buildd. wait until it is, or don't use unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Processed: Re: sun-java5-jre_1.5.0.12-1 missing dependency sun-java5-bin_1.5.0.12-1 in amd64

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 433505 wishlist Bug#433505: sun-java5-jre_1.5.0.12-1 missing dependency sun-java5-bin_1.5.0.12-1 in amd64 Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#431806: ptex-bin: Installation fails while processing a script

2007-07-18 Thread Kimikazu KATO
Frank Küster wrote: > Kimikazu KATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Package: ptex-bin >> Version: 3.1.10~beta3+0.04b-4 >> Severity: grave >> Justification: renders package unusable >> >> *** Please type your report below this line *** >> Installation fails. >> The attached is all the log of "aptit

Processed: forcibly merging 423742 395386

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > forcemerge 423742 395386 Bug#423742: avifile: FTBFS: i386: ../../include/avm_map.h:220: error: 'struct avm::avm_map End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#431806: ptex-bin: Installation fails while processing a script

2007-07-18 Thread Frank Küster
severity 431806 important thanks Kimikazu KATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for your reply. >> fmtutil --byfmt latex > fixed it. > > Now everything is working, so I have no problem. I don't think this command solved anything, but anyway it's probably impossible to debug it now: Your s

Processed: Re: ptex-bin: Installation fails while processing a script

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 431806 important Bug#431806: ptex-bin: Installation fails while processing a script Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Processed: severity of 433597 is important

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > severity 433597 important Bug#433597: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Panic with CR2: 00100108 on SATA with software raid-1 Severity set to `important' from `critical' > End of

Bug#428945: diff for 2.2.2a-7.1 NMU

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
Hi, Attached is the diff for my mrt 2.2.2a-7.1 NMU. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org diff -u mrt-2.2.2a/src/lib/kernel/linux.c mrt-2.2.2a/src/lib/kernel/linux.c --

Bug#433583: marked as done (libcairo-ocaml-dev: Errors when linking with cairo.cma)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433583: fixed in cairo-ocaml 20070306-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#432378: tagging 432375, tagging 432376, tagging 432378, tagging 432420

2007-07-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 tags 432375 pending tags 432376 pending tags 432378 pending # Being fixed in SVN. tags 432420 pending -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 432375, tagging 432376, tagging 432378, tagging 432420

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > tags 432375 pending Bug#432375: octave2.1-forge: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 432376 pending Bug#432376: semidef-oct: F

Bug#424026: diff for 0.3.2-7.2 NMU

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
Hi, Attached is the diff for my python-scipy-core 0.3.2-7.2 NMU. diff -u python-scipy-core-0.3.2/debian/changelog python-scipy-core-0.3.2/debian/changelog --- python-scipy-core-0.3.2/debian/changelog +++ python-scipy-core-0.3.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +python-scipy-core (0.3.2-7.2) unst

Bug#424026: marked as done (python-scipy-core: FTBFS: Numeric (http://www.numpy.org/) module not found.)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424026: fixed in python-scipy-core 0.3.2-7.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: closing 427598

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > close 427598 2.0.1-16 Bug#427598: toshutils: FTBFS: hotkey.c:89:19: error: asm/io.h: No such file or directory 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing

Bug#427989: rdesktop: Install broke apt

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
severity 427989 important tag 427989 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks not to mention that user does stupid things with APT and does not wants to be contacted it seems. On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:46:06PM +0100, Conor Paterson wrote: > Package: rdesktop > Severity: critical > Justification: break

Processed: Re: Bug#427989: rdesktop: Install broke apt

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 427989 important Bug#427989: rdesktop: Install broke apt Severity set to `important' from `critical' > tag 427989 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#427989: rdesktop: Install broke apt There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible >

Processed: r973 - octave2.1-forge/trunk/debian

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 432375 pending Bug#432375: octave2.1-forge: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin Tags were: pending patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admi

Bug#289300: marked as done (xcin: Please Build-Depend on a newer version of Berkeley DB)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289300: fixed in xcin 2.5.2.99.pre2+cvs20030224-1.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#429010: diff for 1.07-11.1 NMU

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
Hi, Attached is the diff for my rio 1.07-11.1 NMU. diff -u rio-1.07/rio.cpp rio-1.07/rio.cpp --- rio-1.07/rio.cpp +++ rio-1.07/rio.cpp @@ -80,8 +80,12 @@ // Changed per bug Debian bug 88779 #if !defined(__alpha__) + #if __GLIBC__ + #include + #els

Bug#432971: Similar issue, but solved

2007-07-18 Thread Guido Trotter
I had a similar problem for 2.6.20 and 2.6.21, but it was solved for me in 2.6.22... Does this work for you too? Can this be closed? Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: closing 427447

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > close 427447 Bug#427447: ttf-opensymbol: postinst script fail 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Chr

Bug#429010: marked as done (rio: FTBFS: rio.cpp:83:21: error: asm/io.h: No such file or directory)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429010: fixed in rio 1.07-11.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#423382: Problem occuring again

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
severity 423382 important tag 423382 + moreinfo unreproducible kthxbye On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 10:43:48AM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > Package: fontconfig > Version: 2.4.2-1.2 > Followup-For: Bug #423382 > > It's come back again, same errors. please provide some kind of backtrace, and/or l

Bug#429285: marked as done (aptitude_0.4.5.2-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: build-deps too weak)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:28:41 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429285: aptitude_0.4.5.2-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: build-deps too weak has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Re: Bug#423382: Problem occuring again

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423382 important Bug#423382: crashes when updating fonts Severity set to `important' from `critical' > tag 423382 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#423382: crashes when updating fonts There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible >

Processed: severity of 422208 is important

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > severity 422208 important Bug#422208: /etc/init.d/collectd doesn't stop all the daemons Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#433633: gnat-4.2 - FTBFS: multiple definition of `convert_addresses'

2007-07-18 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: gnat-4.2 Version: 4.2-20070712-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gnat-4.2_4.2-20070712-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by > sbuild/s390 98 [...] > g-trasym.o convert_addresses.o \ > -Wl,-soname,libgnat-

Processed: block 430245 with 430241

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > # alps-light depends on lam > block 430245 with 430241 Bug#430241: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390 Bug#430245: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390 Wa

Bug#336705: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-386)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:41:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#323742: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to find gcc-3.3)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:41:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Processed: severity of 433486 is normal

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > # libsuitesparse provides libufsparse > severity 433486 normal Bug#433486: depends on removed libufsparse Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processin

Processed: Re: notfound 367645 in 0.9-1

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > fixed 367645 0.9-1 Bug#367645: regexxer: Segmentation Fault on amd64 Bug marked as fixed in version 0.9-1. > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian B

Processed (with 1 errors): bug-triage bugs

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 433591 python-btsutils Bug#433591: Doesn't show reports for anything but bug number Bug reassigned from package `bug-triage' to `python-btsutils'. > tag 433591 + pending Bug#433591: Doesn't show reports for anything but bug number There were n

Processed: Re: Bug#428946: ohphone: FTBFS: /usr/share/openh323/include/ixjlid.h:277:28: error: linux/compiler.h: No such file or directory

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 428946 libopenh323-dev Bug#428946: ohphone: FTBFS: /usr/share/openh323/include/ixjlid.h:277:28: error: linux/compiler.h: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package `ohphone' to `libopenh323-dev'. > reassign 429007 libopenh323-dev B

Bug#428946: ohphone: FTBFS: /usr/share/openh323/include/ixjlid.h:277:28: error: linux/compiler.h: No such file or directory

2007-07-18 Thread Julien Cristau
reassign 428946 libopenh323-dev reassign 429007 libopenh323-dev forcemerge 428946 429007 kthxbye On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:42:17 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/ohphone-1.4.5+20060204' > g++ -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/usr/share/pwlib/include -D

Bug#431721: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: security.d.o packages for etch built on sarge]

2007-07-18 Thread Marcin Owsiany
Just for the record - a fix has been bin-NMU'ed but is not available for automatic upgrade yet. See the URL in the attachment. -- Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://marcin.owsiany.pl/ GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216 --- Begin Message --

Bug#433332: checkgmail: Undefined value error

2007-07-18 Thread Lucas Di Pentima
Sandro Tosi escribió: > Hi Lucas, > upstream author suggest to test that behavior using an UTF8 locale: > could you please odd this? Hi Sandro, I'll try and let you know, thanks. Regards, -- Lucas Di Pentima - Santa Fe, Argentina - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LUNIX S.R.L. - Soluciones en GNU/Li

Bug#420342: Patch for the NMU

2007-07-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 14:26:28 +0200, Mario Iseli wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just searching a sponsor for my NMU for papaya, my changes are > attached to this mail in the form of a patch. > Hi Mario, while you're at it, it'd also be nice to replace the build-dep on tetex-bin with the appropriate te

Bug#428945: marked as done (mrt: FTBFS: linux.c:66:28: error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:47:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428945: fixed in mrt 2.2.2a-7.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#422841: How much of use is gtkmm2.0 anymore?

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:45:15PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > I think it might be better to get rid of this unbuildable package than to > fix it. gtkmm2.0 has been superseded by gtkmm2.4. there are only 4 packages > using gtkmm2.0 anymore: > > * fireflier > > gtkmm2.0 build-dep removed

Processed: closing 432326

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > close 432326 1:1.2.2.3.dfsg-5 Bug#432326: libc6-i386: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package lib32z1 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Develop

Bug#433573: amsn failed to load after upgrade to 0.97~rc1

2007-07-18 Thread Muammar El Khatib
Hi Fabiano, First of all thanks for reporting. Secondly, there is no need to write stuff like: "read INSTALL file or the instructions about how to compile". Please, when you submit a bug do it respectfully. Remember that SID is for testing and introducing new versions and revisions of software

Bug#431025: Bug#433141: Clarifications on issues for this bug

2007-07-18 Thread Michael Schultheiss
Romain Beauxis wrote: > Hope to hear so good news from you or anyone else ... I spoke with the upstream Gallery developers and they're working on getting this module relicensed under BSD or some other GPL compatible license. -- Michael Schultheiss E-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Bug#433573: amsn failed to load after upgrade to 0.97~rc1

2007-07-18 Thread Fabiano Manoel de Andrade
Em Qua, 2007-07-18 às 10:05 -0300, Muammar El Khatib escreveu: > Hi Fabiano, > > > First of all thanks for reporting. Secondly, there is no need to write stuff > like: "read INSTALL file or the instructions about how to compile". Please, > when you submit a bug do it respectfully. Remember that

Bug#427352: diff for 0.5.8-1.1 NMU

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Hi, Attached is the diff for my libdb4.3-ruby 0.5.8-1.1 NMU. diff -u libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src/common.c libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src/common.c --- libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src/common.c +++ libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src/common.c @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ } key->data = StringValuePtr(tmp); key->flags &= ~DB_D

Bug#429004: prismstumbler: diff for NMU version 0.7.0-2.1

2007-07-18 Thread Julien Cristau
tags 429004 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my prismstumbler 0.7.0-2.1 NMU. Cheers, Julien diff -u prismstumbler-0.7.0/debian/changelog prismstumbler-0.7.0/debian/changelog --- prismstumbler-0.7.0/debian/changelog +++ prismstumbler-0.7.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +prismstumbl

Bug#425093: marked as done (gpe-calendar: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425093: fixed in gpe-calendar 0.90-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: prismstumbler: diff for NMU version 0.7.0-2.1

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 429004 + patch Bug#429004: prismstumbler: FTBFS: /usr/include/linux/wireless.h:886: error: 'IFNAMSIZ' undeclared here (not in a function) Tags were: sid lenny Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#427352: marked as done (libdb4.3-ruby - FTBFS: error: 'struct RString' has no member named 'len')

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427352: fixed in libdb4.3-ruby 0.5.8-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#433573: amsn failed to load after upgrade to 0.97~rc1

2007-07-18 Thread Muammar El Khatib
Hi Fabiano, No problem. Yes, it was a confusion. Now I have seen the popup error. I am sorry about the inconvenient with amsn. I will fix it. Regards, Muammar El Khatib

Bug#429004: marked as done (prismstumbler: FTBFS: /usr/include/linux/wireless.h:886: error: 'IFNAMSIZ' undeclared here (not in a function))

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:47:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429004: fixed in prismstumbler 0.7.0-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#427754: marked as done (soundtouch - FTBFS: /bin/sh: @mkdir_p@: command not found)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:00:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427754: soundtouch - FTBFS: /bin/sh: @mkdir_p@: command not found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: severity of 433650 is serious

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > severity 433650 serious Bug#433650: cmigrep: Should depend on libpcre-ocaml Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#428994: diff for 0.2.1-5.1 NMU

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Hi, Attached is the diff for my shaperd 0.2.1-5.1 NMU. diff -u shaperd-0.2.1/debian/changelog shaperd-0.2.1/debian/changelog --- shaperd-0.2.1/debian/changelog +++ shaperd-0.2.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +shaperd (0.2.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Urgency

Bug#431054: aptitude: Still another confirmation

2007-07-18 Thread Michael Ekstrand
Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.5.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #431054 Kernel: 2.6.18-4-686 CPU: Pentium-D 3GHz I'm also seeing this bug. Earlier, I had believed it to only be appearing when I was using an X terminal (either xterm or xfce4-terminal), but testing today indicates it happening in the Linux

Bug#428994: marked as done (shaperd: FTBFS: main.cpp:600: error: 'UTS_RELEASE' was not declared in this scope)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428994: fixed in shaperd 0.2.1-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#433456: dh-make-php: phppkginfo does not open package.xml properly

2007-07-18 Thread Uwe Steinmann
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:49:09PM +0200, Rafal Krypa wrote: > Package: dh-make-php > Version: 0.2.3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I'm sorry for reporting bug in yet unreleased package version, but the > 0.2.2 version is almost unusable because of bug #432880 and

Bug#432003: marked as done (gclcvs: installation fails)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated 18 Jul 2007 10:28:12 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432003: gclcvs: installation fails has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#433127: system unbootable after update to linux-image-2.6.21-2

2007-07-18 Thread Ralph Rößner
Hello, "/dev/hda1 does not exist" is a wide field but since I encountered the same symptoms and worked around them, I can hopefully narrow it down a bit. I encountered the problem on two machines out of eight after upgrading (2.6.18-4 worked fine on both). One is an old P2-300 box with soft RAID

Bug#428928: marked as done (jfbterm: FTBFS: fbdpsp.c:830:20: error: asm/io.h: No such file or directory)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428928: fixed in jfbterm 0.4.7-7.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: fdkdk

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > fixed 432326 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-5 Bug#432326: libc6-i386: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package lib32z1 Bug#432262: libc6-i386 is uninstallable Bug#432330: libc6-i386: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package lib32z

Bug#428920: marked as done (brltty: FTBFS: ../../Programs/usb_linux.c:33:28: error: linux/compiler.h: No such file or directory)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:12:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414068: brltty: diff for NMU version 3.7.2-7.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processed: Re: Bug#414068: brltty: diff for NMU version 3.7.2-7.2

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 414068 Bug#414068: brltty: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: porting needed 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > fixed 428920

Bug#425716: tdb-dev: Fails to open "previous" databases

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
tag 425716 + patch thanks On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:14:44PM +0200, Ludovic Courtes wrote: > Package: tdb-dev > Version: 1.1.0-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > Hi, > > The latest `libtdb' from SID fails to open databases created by the version > previously ava

Processed: Re: Bug#425716: tdb-dev: Fails to open "previous" databases

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 425716 + patch Bug#425716: tdb-dev: Fails to open "previous" databases There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#428949: ocfs2-tools: FTBFS: include/ocfs2_fs.h:538: error: expected expression before 'struct'

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
tag 428949 - patch thanks On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 12:37:05PM +0200, Michael Mende wrote: > tags 428949 +patch > thankyou > > Hello David, > > please add linux-kernel-headers to your build dependencies. This will > solve the problem. it wont, l-k-h is removed. > > -- > Kind Regards, > Michae

Processed: Re: Bug#428949: ocfs2-tools: FTBFS: include/ocfs2_fs.h:538: error: expected expression before 'struct'

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 428949 - patch Bug#428949: ocfs2-tools: FTBFS: include/ocfs2_fs.h:538: error: expected expression before 'struct' Tags were: sid lenny patch Tags removed: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#428949: marked as done (ocfs2-tools: FTBFS: include/ocfs2_fs.h:538: error: expected expression before 'struct')

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:47:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428949: fixed in ocfs2-tools 1.2.1-1.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#433657: contains /etc/defoma/config, as does gs-common

2007-07-18 Thread Joe Drew
Package: libpango1.0-common Version: 1.16.4-1 Severity: serious dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libpango1.0-common_1.16.4-3_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/etc/defoma/config', which is also in package gs-common This has been the case for a few days now. I don't see the bu

Bug#404304: marked as done (xmms2-plugin-faad: faad2 needs to be removed from testing)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:54:30 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#425716: tdb-dev: Fails to open "previous" databases

2007-07-18 Thread Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s
Hi, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem is because of the deactivated spinlock code. The following > patch seems to fix the problem, but I'm unable to understand the > consequences properly (e.g. on a system where things using the old tdb > library could still exist, and b

Bug#428949: diff for 1.2.1-1.4 NMU

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Hi, Attached is the diff for my ocfs2-tools 1.2.1-1.4 NMU. diff -u ocfs2-tools-1.2.1/debian/changelog ocfs2-tools-1.2.1/debian/changelog --- ocfs2-tools-1.2.1/debian/changelog +++ ocfs2-tools-1.2.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +ocfs2-tools (1.2.1-1.4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintain

Bug#404304: marked as done (xmms2-plugin-faad: faad2 needs to be removed from testing)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:48:21 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#404304: marked as done (xmms2-plugin-faad: faad2 needs to be removed from testing)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:04:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line really fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#425716: tdb-dev: Fails to open "previous" databases

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:55:42PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The problem is because of the deactivated spinlock code. The following > > patch seems to fix the problem, but I'm unable to understand the > > consequences properly (e.g

Processed: gkrelltop: diff for NMU version 2.2.9-1.1

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 425320 + patch Bug#425320: gkrelltop: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to generate shared library. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#433650: marked as done (cmigrep: Should depend on libpcre-ocaml)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433650: fixed in cmigrep 1.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#425320: marked as done (gkrelltop: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to generate shared library.)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425320: fixed in gkrelltop 2.2.9-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#425320: gkrelltop: diff for NMU version 2.2.9-1.1

2007-07-18 Thread Julien Cristau
tags 425320 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my gkrelltop 2.2.9-1.1 NMU. Cheers, Julien diff -u gkrelltop-2.2.9/debian/changelog gkrelltop-2.2.9/debian/changelog --- gkrelltop-2.2.9/debian/changelog +++ gkrelltop-2.2.9/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gkrelltop (2.2.9-1.1) unstable;

Bug#433667: silo-installer: Misses copyright file

2007-07-18 Thread Frans Pop
Package: silo-installer Version: 1.10 Severity: serious Tags: pending Chris Andrews noticed that a copyright file is missing in the source package for silo-installer. As Ben Collins is the original author of this udeb, I have drafted a copyright file with the content as listed below and asked h

Bug#427892: diff for 1:2.3.14-1.1 NMU

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Hi, Attached is the diff for my xinetd 1:2.3.14-1.1 NMU. diff -u xinetd-2.3.14/debian/xinetd.prerm xinetd-2.3.14/debian/xinetd.prerm --- xinetd-2.3.14/debian/xinetd.prerm +++ xinetd-2.3.14/debian/xinetd.prerm @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ #!/bin/sh -e # xinetd prerm -if [ -x /etc/init.d/xinetd ]; then +if [

Bug#427892: marked as done (circumvents invoke-rc.d (and thus policy-rc.d) in postinst)

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427892: fixed in xinetd 1:2.3.14-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#432323: Patch

2007-07-18 Thread Jiří Paleček
tags 432323 +patch thanks Hello, I've found out the bug was in fact caused by treating EINTR from select as an error instead of retrying. The attached patch fixes it. PS: reindent it as you wish. Your indentation style (spaces combined with tabs) is really awful. Regards Jiri Palece

Bug#427892: closed by Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#427892: fixed in xinetd 1:2.3.14-1.1)

2007-07-18 Thread Andrew Schulman
Thank you! Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Patch

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 432323 +patch Bug#432323: aptitude: doesn't react to keys after viewing changelog Tags were: unreproducible Bug#431054: aptitude doesn't respond to keyboard after installing/upgrading a package Bug#431688: aptitude do not react to keys after runni

Bug#433667: Please OK licence change for silo-installer udeb

2007-07-18 Thread Frans Pop
(Contributors to silo-installer BCC'ed.) We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer udeb did not include a copyright file. After checking with Ben Collins, the original author, I have added a copyright statement as in [1] in the D-I SVN repository (gpl version 2 or

Bug#433667: Please OK licence change for silo-installer udeb

2007-07-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-18 19:38]: > As this can be considered a licence change and as you have contributed to > silo-installer in the past, please OK this licence change by replying to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a short statement of your agreement. ok -- Martin Michlmayr http:/

Bug#433667: Please OK licence change for silo-installer udeb

2007-07-18 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As this can be considered a licence change and as you have contributed to > silo-installer in the past, please OK this licence change by replying to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a short statement of your agreement

Bug#433667: Please OK licence change for silo-installer udeb

2007-07-18 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frans Pop wrote: > (Contributors to silo-installer BCC'ed.) > > We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer > udeb did not include a copyright file. After checking with Ben Collins, > the original author, I have added a c

Bug#433667: Please OK licence change for silo-installer udeb

2007-07-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:38:05PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer > udeb did not include a copyright file. After checking with Ben Collins, > the original author, I have added a copyright statement as in [1] in the > D-I SVN repo

Bug#433667: [D-I] Announcing licence change for silo-installer udeb

2007-07-18 Thread Frans Pop
We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer udeb did not include a copyright file. This has now been corrected [1]. The new copyright statement is in line with those for other components of the installer (gpl version 2 or later). As this can be considered a licence c

Bug#433500: libc6-dev uninstallable

2007-07-18 Thread Luk Claes
Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Claudio Saavedra wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 18:48 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >>> linux-kernel-headers does not exists, you have to install >>> linux-libc-dev now. Maybe sth is not resolved properly by your apt for >>> one

Bug#433667: Please OK licence change for silo-installer udeb

2007-07-18 Thread Joey Hess
I never intended my contributions to silo-installer to be anything other than GPLed. Version 2+ is fine. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#431054: And it's back

2007-07-18 Thread Steve Greenland
You will no doubt be delighted to know that the lock up is still happening, despite my previous report. It's definitely not tied to the particular 'g,g' sequence; I can trigger it just by starting aptitude and then navigating (e.g. using '[', arrow keys, etc.). Multithreading sucks. Steve --

Bug#422479: libemail-mime-perl: FTBFS: tests failed

2007-07-18 Thread Niko Tyni
tags 422479 patch fixed-upstream thanks On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:21:35PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: libemail-mime-perl > Version: 1.857-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else > Usertags: grid5000 rebuild > # Failed test in t/2.t

Processed: Re: Bug#422479: libemail-mime-perl: FTBFS: tests failed

2007-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 422479 patch fixed-upstream Bug#422479: libemail-mime-perl: FTBFS: tests failed Tags were: sid lenny Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

  1   2   >