Bug#718272: Processed: reopening 718272

close 718272 thanks Quoting Moritz Mühlenhoff (2021-01-27 20:03:40) > reopen 718272 > thx > > Reopening. The reasons are listed in the bug log and were given by > the upstream developers. If you want to provide it to bullseye > stable users, get it into fasttrack.debian.net. Thanks for sharing y

Processed: Re: Bug#718272: Processed: reopening 718272

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 718272 Bug #718272 [src:bitcoin] upstream does not support stable releases (block migration to testing) Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 718272: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Bug#718272: Processed: reopening 718272

reopen 718272 thx Reopening. The reasons are listed in the bug log and were given by the upstream developers. If you want to provide it to bullseye stable users, get it into fasttrack.debian.net. Cheers, Moritz

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Processed: reopening 718272

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 718272 Bug #718272 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [src:bitcoin] upstream does not support stable releases (block migration to testing) Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #718272 to the same values previously set > thx

Bug#718272: Processed: reopening 718272

FWIW, I brought this up at our weekly developer meeting, and there was also another concern about apt upgrades across softforks: It could be problematic to not deploy a softfork, and problematic to deploy one without the user's consent. I think I recall Debian has a way for packages to interact

Bug#718272: Processed: reopening 718272

Quoting Luke Dashjr (2021-01-07 18:26:43) > We (upstream) already elaborated many years ago, copied here: > > http://luke.dashjr.org/tmp/code/20130723-linux-distribution-packaging-and-bitcoin.md.asc > > At a minimum, to be safe, Debian would need to: > > 1) Either: > 1a) Build with the bundled L

Bug#718272: Processed: reopening 718272

We (upstream) already elaborated many years ago, copied here: http://luke.dashjr.org/tmp/code/20130723-linux-distribution-packaging-and-bitcoin.md.asc At a minimum, to be safe, Debian would need to: 1) Either: 1a) Build with the bundled LevelDB statically linked. 1b) Guarantee LevelDB package re

Processed: reopening 718272

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 718272 Bug #718272 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [src:bitcoin] upstream does not support stable releases (block migration to testing) Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #718272 to the same values previously set > tha

Processed: reopening 718272

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 718272 Bug #718272 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [src:bitcoin] upstream does not support stable releases (block migration to testing) Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #718272 to the same values previously set > tha