Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> iiuc, getmail6 is not a "hostile fork".
It is; I could explain it, but I already have. Quoting from the getmail
documentation:
Why do I say it's a "hostile" fork? Because I have communicated with the
maintainer and indicated I would be thrilled to accept their
On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 11:39 PM Charles Cazabon
wrote:
>
> Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
>
> So, my preference is:
>
> 1. rename the package and executable. As I have pointed out, this is the
> normal, polite, accepted best practice when forking a project. The fact that
> Roland claims to have
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> 1) The Debian maintainers of getmail have offered to help with
> supporting python3 and have even submitted patches or pointed to their
> wip branches in github which I think were all rejected.
I have not rejected anything. I have asked questions of people who submitt
I have thought about it again while going through all the old mails of
getmail mailing list and also https://bugs.debian.org/936604 and these
are my thoughts:
1) The Debian maintainers of getmail have offered to help with
supporting python3 and have even submitted patches or pointed to their
wip b
I'd like to strongly object to the removal of this package from Debian.
As per the Debian social contract: "4. Our priorities are our users and free
software. We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software
community. *We will place their interests first in our priorities*".
It
5 matches
Mail list logo
