Bug#996276: foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0

2022-05-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 07:25:45PM +0300, Andriy Grytsenko wrote: > >You can test it by installing the version from unstable. > > It is not in unstable yet, see That should have said experimental. Kurt

Bug#996276: foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0

2022-05-11 Thread Andriy Grytsenko
>You can test it by installing the version from unstable. It is not in unstable yet, see https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libssl-dev and https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openssl

Processed: Re: Bug#996276: foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0

2022-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 996276 - bookworm-ignore experimental + bookworm sid Bug #996276 [src:foxeye] foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 Removed tag(s) bookworm-ignore and experimental. Bug #996276 [src:foxeye] foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 Added tag(s) sid and bookwor

Bug#996276: foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0

2022-05-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
tags 996276 - bookworm-ignore experimental + bookworm sid thanks This is affecting the bookworm release. The release managers approved the upload to unstable and marked it as serious/release critical. You can test it by installing the version from unstable.

Bug#996276: foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0

2022-05-11 Thread Andriy Grytsenko
control: tags -1 - bookworm sid + bookworm-ignore experimental Could you explain, please, how this issue is an RC bug if sid contains version 1.1.1o and 3.0 version is only in experimental? And how should I do and test required changes if said version is not in sid at all?

Processed: Re: Bug#996276: foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0

2022-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - bookworm sid + bookworm-ignore experimental Bug #996276 [src:foxeye] foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 Removed tag(s) sid and bookworm. Bug #996276 [src:foxeye] foxeye: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 Added tag(s) experimental and bookworm-ignore. -- 996276: https://