Bug#984614: snort in Bullseye

2021-04-10 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 20:10, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Control: found -1 2.9.15.1-2 > > Hi, > > it appears this conffile handling problem is caused by a not good > enough attempt to move the old conffile /etc/cron.daily/5snort to > /etc/cron.daily/snort-common. > You are correct. > It would

Bug#984614: snort in Bullseye

2021-04-09 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Control: found -1 2.9.15.1-2 Hi, it appears this conffile handling problem is caused by a not good enough attempt to move the old conffile /etc/cron.daily/5snort to /etc/cron.daily/snort-common. This was introduced in version 2.9.15.1-2 commit 8780db8c, to snort-common.preinst: +# renam

Processed: Re: Bug#984614: snort in Bullseye

2021-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 2.9.15.1-2 Bug #984614 [snort-common] snort-common: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/cron.daily/snort-common Marked as found in versions snort/2.9.15.1-2. -- 984614: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#984614: snort in Bullseye

2021-03-30 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi, would it be possible to resolve this RC-bug and keep snort available in Bullseye? Thorsten