On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:51:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> this bug report is from 24 Dec, so the breakage was not caused by the
> libsbml 5.19 upgrade.
>
> python-cobra seems to have been broken by Python 3.8 -> 3.9
Yes, but it seems cobra 0.20 is broken by libsbml 5.19 which is no
real los
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:04:03PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Andreas,
>...
> I'm not sure whether this is related to libsbml 5.19 upgrade (I admit I
> failed to
> realise that upgrading libsbml might mean a transition since I lived under the
> impression that libsbml has no rde
Hi Adrian,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:07:27AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > __ ERROR at setup of TestManipulation.test_escape_ids
> > __
> >
> > filename = '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cobra/test/data/textbook.xml.gz'
> > number =
> > f_replace = {'F_GENE': ,
> > 'F_G
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 09:58:57PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Source: python-cobra
> Version: 0.19.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: regression
>
> Hi Maintainer
>
> The autopkgtests of python-c
Source: python-cobra
Version: 0.19.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
The autopkgtests of python-cobra recently started to fail in testing [1].
I've copied what I hope is the relevan
5 matches
Mail list logo
