Hello Chris!
On 2/7/21 3:04 PM, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>> I don't think we're doing ourselves a favor by rushing hotfixes in to get
>> these
>> packages into the next release.
>
> Given I saw you making this argument in another bug report - what
> other options do we have?
>
> For packages t
You wrote:
> On 2/7/21 2:00 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
[..]
> I previously thought that libburnia is already being used by all relevant
> packages
> and that cdrkit is required only for mkisofs, in particular for creating ISO
> images with a HFS (not HFS+) filesystem.
That was also my vague un
On 2021-02-07 14:05:29 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 2/7/21 2:00 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > I'm not sure how you've reached that conclusion. dak definitely
> > disagrees:
> >
> > $ dak rm -Rn cdrkit
> > Will remove the following packages from unstable:
>
> I know what dak sa
On 2/7/21 2:00 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> I'm not sure how you've reached that conclusion. dak definitely
> disagrees:
>
> $ dak rm -Rn cdrkit
> Will remove the following packages from unstable:
I know what dak says I looked that up myself after you made that statement.
I previously thought
On 2021-02-05 11:26:28 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 2/5/21 11:11 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >> Is there a reason why this was uploaded so hastily? Is cdrkit a dependeny
> >> for anything else?
> >
> > It's a key package with an old RC bug and a trivial fix (not even
> > speaki
On 2/5/21 11:11 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> Is there a reason why this was uploaded so hastily? Is cdrkit a dependeny
>> for anything else?
>
> It's a key package with an old RC bug and a trivial fix (not even
> speaking of a bunch of important reverse dependencies). We (the release
> team) a
On 2021-02-05 10:49:54, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 2/4/21 10:58 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >> the ITA bug has been filed, but nothing happended since then. So I've
> >> prepared an NMU for cdrkit (versioned as 9:1.1.11-3.2). The diff is
> >> attached to this message.
>
> It
On 2/4/21 10:58 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> the ITA bug has been filed, but nothing happended since then. So I've
>> prepared an NMU for cdrkit (versioned as 9:1.1.11-3.2). The diff is
>> attached to this message.
It would have been nice if the package had been uploaded to DELAYED whic
Please don’t. I am planning to work on this in the following days. I was stuck
with hfsprogs.
Thanks,
Adrian
> On Feb 4, 2021, at 10:41 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> Control: tags 957074 + patch
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> the ITA bug has been filed, but nothing happended since then. So I'
Control: tags 957074 + patch
Dear maintainer,
the ITA bug has been filed, but nothing happended since then. So I've
prepared an NMU for cdrkit (versioned as 9:1.1.11-3.2). The diff is
attached to this message.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
diff -Nru cdrkit-1.1.11/debian/changelog cdrkit-1.1.11/d
10 matches
Mail list logo
