Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-03-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi Santiago, On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 09:41 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > Hi Ritesh, > > When trying to upload I realized the format of the package is that of > a > native package, but the version has a revision at the same time. > Which I > think it is unusual. > I don't understand how the packa

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-03-05 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 26/02/20 a las 11:10, Santiago R.R. escribió: > Hi Ritesh, > > I've just made another MR to modify the changelog entry. > > Also, please, remember to create a tag for the release once it get > approved (and uploaded). Hi Ritesh, When trying to upload I realized the format of the package is t

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-02-26 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi Ritesh, I've just made another MR to modify the changelog entry. Also, please, remember to create a tag for the release once it get approved (and uploaded). Cheers, -- Santiago signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-02-24 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 24/02/20 a las 15:29, Ritesh Raj Sarraf escribió: > Sorry. I hadn't realized that you already had MRs on Salsa. But I > wasn't aware of the extra configuration needed for notifications. Mmm, maybe I had to continue using the BTS, instead of the MR. At least for communicating with you. > > Ple

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-02-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Sorry. I hadn't realized that you already had MRs on Salsa. But I wasn't aware of the extra configuration needed for notifications. Please go ahead with the upload. Thanks, Ritesh On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 15:16 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hi Santiago, > > Do you have the MR ready ? > > Yo

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-02-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi Santiago, Do you have the MR ready ? Your bug report against the package in Buster has caused a trigger to auto-remove UML from Debian Testing. I don't know how removing the package from testing solves any problem with the package in Buster. If you have the MR done, can we please get it merg

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-02-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi Santiago, On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 15:46 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote: > BTW, I will prepare a git branch in my personal salsa namespace. But > I > am not sure against which branch should I propose a MR. Thank you for taking care of the packages in Buster. I just created a branch for Buster. You ca

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-02-14 Thread Santiago R.R.
Package: user-mode-linux Version: 4.19-1um-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Dear maintainer, The current user-mode-linux package in buster fails to build the latest linux kernel in buster due to the fix-port-helper-path.patch: Applying patch /build/user-mode-linux-4.19-1um/debian/patches/fix-por