On 2/19/20 2:02 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:10:27AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> Thanks, but I don't need you to micro-manage the bugs in the BTS for me.
>
> I'm not really micro-managing anything for you. I'm just making sure
> that the information in the BTS is co
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:10:27AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Thanks, but I don't need you to micro-manage the bugs in the BTS for me.
I'm not really micro-managing anything for you. I'm just making sure
that the information in the BTS is correct. Not necessarily for you,
but for anybody work
On 2/18/20 1:26 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> reopen 949227
> found 949227 4.5.0-4
> fixed 949227 4.5.0-7
> retitle 949227 python-pysaml2: FTBFS in buster because of expired certificate
> thanks
>
> Reopening because packages in stable *must* build in stable.
> In fact, it fails right now, without wa
reopen 949227
found 949227 4.5.0-4
fixed 949227 4.5.0-7
retitle 949227 python-pysaml2: FTBFS in buster because of expired certificate
thanks
Reopening because packages in stable *must* build in stable.
In fact, it fails right now, without waiting to 2020-11-28.
Error message says something like t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 949227
Bug #949227 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:python-pysaml2] python-pysaml2 FTBFS after 2020-11-28
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-a
5 matches
Mail list logo
