Le Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 09:35:44AM +0100, Michael Crusoe a écrit :
>
> dcut dm --uid 724D609337113C710550D7473C26763F6C67E6E2 --allow last-align
Hi Michael,
I ran the commmand a bit more than one hour ago.
My Debian skills are a bit rusty; I am not sure if I should receive an
automatic email fe
I did look at the code, the AVX2 code is actually used, and I've made the
package more compatible for more architectures via the simde library at
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/last-align/tree/simde
Since I don't have upload rights to last-align, I invite sponsorship of my
changes. Or someone c
did somebody even look at the code? The AVX2 code is never used. Looks like an
unguarded include.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 upstream
Bug #946850 [src:last-align] last-align ftbfs on non-x86 architectures
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded -1 l...@cbrc.jp
Bug #946850 [src:last-align] last-align ftbfs on non-x86 architectures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'l...@cbrc.jp'.
--
9468
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 l...@cbrc.jp
Hi,
the Debian packaged version of last has received the bug report you can
read below. We are building last on several architectures which was not
a problem for previous versions. Is there any restriction to run last
only on x86 arc
Package: src:last-align
Version: 1021-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
last-align ftbfs on non-x86 architectures, and I really didn't check if it's
doing the right thing on i386 with the intrinsics ...
In file included from GappedXdropAligner.hh:49,
from GappedXdropAligner
6 matches
Mail list logo
