> I'd have been happy to, but at the time, DPMT was using git-dpm and it
> didn't seem worth learning to use an unmaintained tool just to package a
> couple of python modules.
yeah, i feel you, and since then we migrated to salsa and a plain gbp
+ pristine-tar workflow
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My
On ٨/٦/١٤٤١ هـ ١٢:١٥ م, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Control: tags 937738 + patch
>
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for python-et-xmlfile (versioned as 1.0.1-2.1). The diff
> is attached to this message.
>
> Consider maintaining this package with the DPMT
>
I'd have been happy to,
Control: tags 937738 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for python-et-xmlfile (versioned as 1.0.1-2.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Consider maintaining this package with the DPMT
Regards.
diff -Nru python-et-xmlfile-1.0.1/debian/changelog python-et-xmlfile-1.0.1/debian/c
3 matches
Mail list logo