Bug#932320: [Cross-toolchain-base-devs] Bug#932320: Bug#932320: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen FTBFS in unstable

2019-07-18 Thread Matthias Klose
On 18.07.19 12:53, Esa Peuha wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:40 PM Matthias Klose wrote: >> >> please see >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2019/07/msg1.html > > Well, if you don't want to fix c-t-b-mipsen, would you agree to have it > removed from testing? That should allow binutils

Bug#932320: [Cross-toolchain-base-devs] Bug#932320: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen FTBFS in unstable

2019-07-18 Thread Esa Peuha
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:40 PM Matthias Klose wrote: > > please see > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2019/07/msg1.html Well, if you don't want to fix c-t-b-mipsen, would you agree to have it removed from testing? That should allow binutils and gcc to migrate.

Bug#932320: [Cross-toolchain-base-devs] Bug#932320: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen FTBFS in unstable

2019-07-17 Thread Matthias Klose
On 17.07.19 18:19, Esa Peuha wrote: > Source: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen > Version: 4 > Severity: serious > > Current version of cross-toolchain-base-mipsen FTBFS with binutils from > unstable (version 2.32.51.20190707-1). This is blocking binutils from > migrating from unstable to testing (which

Bug#932320: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen FTBFS in unstable

2019-07-17 Thread Esa Peuha
Source: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen Version: 4 Severity: serious Current version of cross-toolchain-base-mipsen FTBFS with binutils from unstable (version 2.32.51.20190707-1). This is blocking binutils from migrating from unstable to testing (which transitively blocks migration of a bunch of other