Thanks for your answer.
That the Makefile, if present, should work is certainly a reasonable
expectation, but as far as I can see, it isn't a license requirement.
Note that the GPL also explicitly states that the program is provided
without warranty of any kind (clause 11 in GPLv2, 15 in GPLv3), t
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 09:50:43AM +0200, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Among those packages there is even a GPL violation in gcc-8-cross,
> as the FTBFS problem happens because the Makefile is buggy (the GPL
> says packages must be distributed with a working Makefile).
>
> I
Santiago Vila wrote:
> Among those packages there is even a GPL violation in gcc-8-cross,
as the FTBFS problem happens because the Makefile is buggy (the GPL
says packages must be distributed with a working Makefile).
I was very surprised to read that. I just reread the GPL and could not
find that
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:48:09AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> > This was automatically closed by ftpmaster because the package was
> > removed from unstable, but this still does not fix the FTBFS problem
> > in stable.
>
> Unfortunately I don't think a proper fix will be forthcoming, upstream
> h
This was automatically closed by ftpmaster because the package was
removed from unstable, but this still does not fix the FTBFS problem
in stable.
Unfortunately I don't think a proper fix will be forthcoming, upstream
has abandoned the crate in question.
Afaict the only purpose this package ser
5 matches
Mail list logo
