Hi lynxis,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:04 PM Alexander Couzens wrote:
> > I'm playing with the different patched versions for hours now.
> > Indeed, it seems with your latest patch the memory leak is bearable.
>
> Nice to hear. I compressed a 8GB tree of toolchains and rootfs with
> valgrind (too
Hi Laszlo,
> I'm playing with the different patched versions for hours now.
> Indeed, it seems with your latest patch the memory leak is bearable.
Nice to hear. I compressed a 8GB tree of toolchains and rootfs with
valgrind (took > 10h ;) without any noticable leaks.
> I've never tested CPU usa
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:50 PM Alexander Couzens wrote:
> Here is an updated patch to match debian's state of squashfs-tools.
I'm playing with the different patched versions for hours now.
Indeed, it seems with your latest patch the memory leak is bearable.
I've never tested CPU usage before. I'
Hi lamby,
> Alas, I don't think I will be able to get to writing a patch/fix today
> as I don't fully understand the leak (or, actually, the original
> patch!) just yet.
>
> Lynxis, do you have any quick pointers, however?
original, my patch had the problem, that it use the
same stream (compres
Dear lynxis,
> original, my patch had the problem, that it use the
> same stream (compressor context) as the main thread. This seems to be
> ok, as long the compression is not lzo (I tested with lzma).
>
> After your patch to fix lzo, the compressor will be initialized with a
> new context on ev
> Laszlo, would you like any assistance with a debdiff or is lynxis'
> patch sufficient asis? You will have to patch the existing patch, if
> you see what I mean...
Here is an updated patch to match debian's state of squashfs-tools.
Best,
lynxis
Index: squashfs-tools-4.3/squashfs-tools/mksquashfs
Hi László,
> Am I right that this isn't going to be fixed soon? I will remove this
> patch on Monday in the afternoon as the release of Buster is getting
> close.
Alas, I don't think I will be able to get to writing a patch/fix today
as I don't fully understand the leak (or, actually, the origi
Hi all,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 7:33 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> Looks like a few other folks have hit this issue:
> https://redmine.tails.boum.org/code/issues/16457
>
This is also the case why not all CPU cores are used during the run of
mksquashfs.
Am I right that this isn't going to be fixed s
8 matches
Mail list logo
