On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
I'm uploading this fix in deferred/10, please Thorsten let me know if I can
speed it up!
yes, please do as fast as you want to.
I also rebased the patch and forwarded it upstream, since nobody did it so far.
Thanks a lot.
Thorsten
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 907348 patch pending
Bug #907348 [src:dateutils] dateutils FTBFS on 32bit: test failures
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
907348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/hroptatyr/dateutils/pull/103
Bug #907348 [src:dateutils] dateutils FTBFS on 32bit: test failures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/hroptatyr/dateutils/pull/103'.
--
907348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/hroptatyr/dateutils/pull/103
On Wed, 8 May 2019 01:01:24 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_=c3=9cbelacker?=
wrote:
> Control: tags 907348 + patch upstream
>
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I tried to have a look and tracked it down into the file
> lib/leap-seconds.def whi
Control: tags 907348 + patch upstream
Dear Maintainer,
I tried to have a look and tracked it down into the file
lib/leap-seconds.def which is generated by ltrcc.
Unfortunately this generator seems not prepared for at least i386.
With attached patch the generated file is equal to one
generated a
Processing control commands:
> tags 907348 + patch upstream
Bug #907348 [src:dateutils] dateutils FTBFS on 32bit: test failures
Added tag(s) patch and upstream.
--
907348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Control: reopen -1
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:33:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>...
> dateutils (0.4.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* New upstream release (Closes: #907348, #909031)
>...
Still FTBFS:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dateutils&suite=sid
cu
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #907348 {Done: Thorsten Alteholz } [src:dateutils]
dateutils FTBFS on 32bit: test failures
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No lon
8 matches
Mail list logo