Bug#906222: gdal: undeterministically broken python packages

2018-08-20 Thread Niko Tyni
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > So far I've not been able to reproduce this issue. > > How massively parallel are your builds? Looks like they have parallel=4. But the sid s390x build that encountered this only has parallel=2. https://buildd.debian.or

Processed: Re: Bug#906222: gdal: undeterministically broken python packages

2018-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #906222 [src:gdal] gdal: undeterministically broken python packages Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. -- 906222: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906222 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debia

Bug#906222: gdal: undeterministically broken python packages

2018-08-20 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo On 8/15/18 5:38 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 08/15/2018 05:15 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: >> I haven't located the cause yet; diffing build logs makes me wonder if >> the 'generate' target of swig/python/GNUmakefile is getting erroneously >> run in parall

Bug#906222: gdal: undeterministically broken python packages

2018-08-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/15/2018 05:15 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > I haven't located the cause yet; diffing build logs makes me wonder if > the 'generate' target of swig/python/GNUmakefile is getting erroneously > run in parallel with targets compiling the files that 'generate' modifies. > So maybe it's just a case of fra

Bug#906222: gdal: undeterministically broken python packages

2018-08-15 Thread Niko Tyni
Source: gdal Version: 2.3.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, it looks like the build system of the gdal Python bindings will undeterministically produce truncated or broken f