Hi Niko,
Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Anyone can enlighten me if this is a perl bug or, if not, which change
> > caused this difference?
>
> Seems related to
>
> https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=133301
Thanks!
> so undefined behaviour that happened to change now?
Ah, so it's probably t
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:34:08PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Perl 5.26:
>
> → perl -E 'my $i = 0 ; while ($i < 10) { $ii[$i++] = "ii[$i] = $i" ; say
> $ii[$i-1]; } '
> ii[0] = 0
> ii[1] = 1
[...]
> Perl 5.28:
>
> → perl -E 'my $i = 0 ; while ($i < 10) { $ii[$i++] = "ii[$i] = $i" ; say
>
Hi,
Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> The problem in this case might not be that hard to fix,
Basically it's patching what (so far) one test expects to output.
And I can reproduce this difference with pure perl only:
Perl 5.26:
→ perl -E 'my $i = 0 ; while ($i < 10) { $ii[$i++] = "ii[$i] = $i" ; say
Hi,
gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Is there an APT repo where I can get all the build-dependencies
> > necessary to debug this?
>
> Yup, at the same server. Details and key at the start page of
> http://perl.debian.net/
Ah, sorry, was probably to tired yesterday to try the most obvious
thing. :-) An
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:23:54AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 04:24:59 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> > Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > The upstream version of this package has not worked since 5.18, and we
> > > have had to apply several fixes in Debian since. The build h
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 04:24:59 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > The upstream version of this package has not worked since 5.18, and we
> > have had to apply several fixes in Debian since. The build has now
> > broken again with Perl 5.27:
> >
> > http://perl.debian.net/reb
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #899021 [src:libembperl-perl] libembperl-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.27,
unmaintained upstream
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
899021: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899021
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> The upstream version of this package has not worked since 5.18, and we
> have had to apply several fixes in Debian since. The build has now
> broken again with Perl 5.27:
>
> http://perl.debian.net/rebuild-logs/perl-5.27-throwaway/libemb
Hi,
sorry for the late reply, this came in during my holidays and I
noticed it today due to the testing removal.
Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Currently the package has a popcon of inst: 37 / vote: 22 / recent: 1
Of which at least two boxes are from myself.
> So I suggest that rather than spendi
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:17:43AM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Friday, 18 May 2018 17:08:38 CEST Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > Currently the package has a popcon of inst: 37 / vote: 22 / recent: 1
> > suggesting that it is barely used anywhere.
>
> Reading its features, I think this modul
On Friday, 18 May 2018 17:08:38 CEST Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Currently the package has a popcon of inst: 37 / vote: 22 / recent: 1
> suggesting that it is barely used anywhere.
Reading its features, I think this module may have been a good idea when it
was created back in 1997, but I'm afrai
Source: libembperl-perl
Version: 2.5.0-11
Severity: serious
Justification: unmaintained upstream, and will shortly break in Debian
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.28-transition hh2018
The upstream version of this package has not worked
12 matches
Mail list logo
