Bug#893221: knopflerfish-osgi FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-03-30 Thread Felix Natter
Emmanuel Bourg writes: hello Emmanuel, > Le 30/03/2018 à 09:41, Felix Natter a écrit : > >> Is the following ok for getting rid of the -java-doc package >> (I don't think it makes sense to keep an older doc package)? >> >> Package: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java >> Architecture: all >>

Bug#893221: knopflerfish-osgi FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-03-30 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 30/03/2018 à 09:41, Felix Natter a écrit : > Is the following ok for getting rid of the -java-doc package > (I don't think it makes sense to keep an older doc package)? > > Package: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java > Architecture: all > Depends: ${misc:Depends} > -Suggests: libknopflerfi

Bug#893221: knopflerfish-osgi FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-03-30 Thread Felix Natter
Emmanuel Bourg writes: > Le 28/03/2018 à 21:40, Felix Natter a écrit : > >> I tried several variations of javadoc's -exclude parameter: >> >> -exclude "org.knopflerfish.framework.bundlestorage.dex" >> -exclude "org.knopflerfish.framework.bundlestorage.dex.DexArchive" >> -exclude "org.knopflerfis

Bug#893221: knopflerfish-osgi FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-03-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 28/03/2018 à 21:40, Felix Natter a écrit : > I tried several variations of javadoc's -exclude parameter: > > -exclude "org.knopflerfish.framework.bundlestorage.dex" > -exclude "org.knopflerfish.framework.bundlestorage.dex.DexArchive" > -exclude "org.knopflerfish.framework.bundlestorage.dex.*"

Bug#893221: knopflerfish-osgi FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-03-28 Thread Felix Natter
Adrian Bunk writes: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:35:48AM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: >> hello Adrian, > > Hi Felix, hello Adrian, >> thank you very much for the report. >> >> I am not sure that this is a Java9 issue, lookls more like some classes >> (org.osgi.annotation.versioning.*) were dropp

Bug#893221: knopflerfish-osgi FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-03-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:35:48AM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: > hello Adrian, Hi Felix, > thank you very much for the report. > > I am not sure that this is a Java9 issue, lookls more like some classes > (org.osgi.annotation.versioning.*) were dropped from a package I depend > on. the relevant

Bug#893221: knopflerfish-osgi FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-03-24 Thread Felix Natter
hello Adrian, thank you very much for the report. I am not sure that this is a Java9 issue, lookls more like some classes (org.osgi.annotation.versioning.*) were dropped from a package I depend on. I will look into this soon (Friday, start of Easter weekend, at the latest). Can we change the pri

Bug#893221: knopflerfish-osgi FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-03-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: knopflerfish-osgi Version: 6.1.1-1 Severity: serious https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/knopflerfish-osgi.html ... javadoc -locale en -encoding "UTF-8" -sourcepath osgi/framework/src -d api -subpackages org.knopflerfish:org.osgi Loading source files for pa