Bug#892096: gcc-snapshot: AddressSanitizer uses glibc internal functions

2018-03-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2018-03-20 01:06:50 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761 > Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream > > in the sense that this will be OK at least up to glibc 2.27. > > See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761#c9 > > Aut

Bug#892096: gcc-snapshot: AddressSanitizer uses glibc internal functions

2018-03-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761 Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream in the sense that this will be OK at least up to glibc 2.27. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761#c9 Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 19 20:47:29 2018 New Revision: 258663 URL:

Bug#892096: gcc-snapshot: AddressSanitizer uses glibc internal functions

2018-03-14 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: reopen -1 On 2018-03-14 10:27:35 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-03-14 09:20:17 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > now built using glibc-2.27. > > Which version? FYI, I still obtain a crash with 201803012-1. Reopening since 201803012-1 depends on libc6 (>= 2.27), thus has presumel

Bug#892096: gcc-snapshot: AddressSanitizer uses glibc internal functions

2018-03-14 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2018-03-14 09:20:17 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > now built using glibc-2.27. Which version? FYI, I still obtain a crash with 201803012-1. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer a