Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2018 13:48:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#890907: fixed in cjose 0.6.1+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #890907,
regarding cjose FTBFS on big endian: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 03 Aug 2018 15:19:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#890907: fixed in cjose 0.6.0+dfsg1-2~exp2
has caused the Debian Bug report #890907,
regarding cjose FTBFS on big endian: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi Adrian,
yeah, that didn't work out...
If you have time, would you mind looking at our analysis at
https://github.com/cisco/cjose/issues/70 where we gathered our findings?
Best wishes,
Moritz
On 20.05.2018 15:36, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:39:03PM
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #890907 {Done: Moritz Schlarb } [src:cjose] cjose
FTBFS on big endian: test failure
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reope
Control: reopen -1
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:39:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>...
> cjose (0.6.0+dfsg1-2~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
>...
>* Test upstream patch from
> https://github.com/cisco/cjose/pull/71 (Closes: #890907)
>...
Seems this didn't work:
https://
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2018 20:36:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#890907: fixed in cjose 0.6.0+dfsg1-2~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #890907,
regarding cjose FTBFS on big endian: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Source: cjose
Version: 0.6.0+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cjose&suite=sid
...
FAIL: check_cjose
=
Running suite(s): CJOSE
version
util
base64
concatkdf
jwk
jwe
jws
header
95%: Checks: 62, Failures: 3, Errors: 0
check_version.c:1
7 matches
Mail list logo
