Bug#889710: it's the -mingw not binutils- part

On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 20:47:20 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > Some recent change in unstable makes arch-test FTBFS: > > > > > This might be a regression somewhere in the MinGW packages, > > > maintainer is Cc'ed. > > > Thanks for the report, this is indeed a recent regression in binutils

Bug#889710: it's the -mingw not binutils- part

> > Some recent change in unstable makes arch-test FTBFS: > > > This might be a regression somewhere in the MinGW packages, > > maintainer is Cc'ed. > Thanks for the report, this is indeed a recent regression in binutils > (2.29.1-10 works, 2.29.1-13 doesn’t). On the other hand, taking Stretch'