On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:21:21AM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2018-01-27 8:48 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk :
>
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 08:20:11PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > >...
> > > as you see there is ongoing process of removing of old libs in debian.
> > > invada-studio-plugins-lv2 packa
2018-01-27 8:48 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk :
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 08:20:11PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> >...
> > as you see there is ongoing process of removing of old libs in debian.
> > invada-studio-plugins-lv2 package depends on one of them unfortunately.
> >...
>
> Is there actually any r
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 08:20:11PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>...
> as you see there is ongoing process of removing of old libs in debian.
> invada-studio-plugins-lv2 package depends on one of them unfortunately.
>...
Is there actually any reason why the package does depend on libgnome?
No plu
2017-12-29 19:27 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Bicha :
> Source: invada-studio-plugins-lv2
> Version: 1.2.0+repack0-7
> Severity: serious
> User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: oldlibs libgnome
> Tags: sid buster
>
> As announced [1], we do not intend to release Debian 10 "Buster" wi
Source: invada-studio-plugins-lv2
Version: 1.2.0+repack0-7
Severity: serious
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: oldlibs libgnome
Tags: sid buster
As announced [1], we do not intend to release Debian 10 "Buster" with
the old libgnome (and related) libraries. These librari
5 matches
Mail list logo