On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Does the attached patch fix it?
It appears so. (Though I did have to apply it by hand as there was no
"clientsession" line for patch to sync to in hunk #2.)
--
Daniel Schepler
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:14:45AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Is that reproducible?
>
> Yes, it's definitely reproducible on my machine.
Does the attached patch fix it?
Kurt
>From b72668a0d3586ee2560f0536c43e18991a4cfc6f Mon Sep 17
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Is that reproducible?
Yes, it's definitely reproducible on my machine.
--
Daniel Schepler
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:18:32PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Source: openssl
> Version: 1.1.0f-3
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log (on amd64):
>
> ...
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> ../../test/recipes/70-test_sslrecords.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 0)
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
