Bug#858525: libjack-jackd2-dev: Depend on jackd2

2017-03-29 Thread James Cowgill
Control: forcemerge -1 715088 Hi, On 29/03/17 01:23, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On 2017-03-28 04:04, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:22:41PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>> I think the approach of adding a 'depends' to jackd2 is the simplest. >>> Moving the shared library to

Processed: Re: Bug#858525: libjack-jackd2-dev: Depend on jackd2

2017-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forcemerge -1 715088 Bug #858525 [libjack-jackd2-dev] libjack-jackd2-dev: broken symlink: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjackserver.so -> libjackserver.so.0.1.0 Bug #858525 [libjack-jackd2-dev] libjack-jackd2-dev: broken symlink: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjackserv

Bug#858525: libjack-jackd2-dev: Depend on jackd2

2017-03-28 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On 2017-03-28 04:04, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:22:41PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I think the approach of adding a 'depends' to jackd2 is the simplest. Moving the shared library to the -dev packages doesn't work, because /usr/bin/jackd2 and netserver.so link against it

Bug#858525: libjack-jackd2-dev: Depend on jackd2

2017-03-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:22:41PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > I think the approach of adding a 'depends' to jackd2 is the simplest. > Moving the shared library to the -dev packages doesn't work, because > /usr/bin/jackd2 and netserver.so link against it. Why not moving the file to libjack-ja

Bug#858525: libjack-jackd2-dev: Depend on jackd2

2017-03-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
tags 858525 patch stop Hi, I think the approach of adding a 'depends' to jackd2 is the simplest. Moving the shared library to the -dev packages doesn't work, because /usr/bin/jackd2 and netserver.so link against it. The downside of this patch is that every package that depends on libjack-jackd2-