Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> The buildds are using the aspcud sbuild resolver for experimental
I'm using mk-build-deps w/--no-install-recommends. It does not get
installed with that (and therefore I did not see the build failures
prior to uploading).
> Anyhow, if a package causes the build to fail it
tags 857940 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=d03037820c34ddd168d6ce5d000e5a5dbcbf4e7f
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:40:46PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Assuming this is from...
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=diffoscope&arch=all&ver=79&stamp=1489658432&raw=0
yes.
> ... it appears to be caused by "graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat"
> package being installed. Wi
Hi Mattia,
> […]
Assuming this is from...
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=diffoscope&arch=all&ver=79&stamp=1489658432&raw=0
... it appears to be caused by "graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat"
package being installed. With this package installed locally I can
reproduce the test
Source: diffoscope
Version: 79
Severity: serious
=== FAILURES ===
test_diff_meta
differences_meta = []
@skip_unless_tools_exist('img2txt', 'identify')
@skip_u
5 matches
Mail list logo
