Control: severity -1 important
Ok, as we have a new bug now, I am setting the severity accordingly.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Circumventing the required *-rc.d policy layers like this is a
serious policy violation. (9.3.3)
No, it is a "should"-clause and according to 1.1
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #850762 [setserial] setserial: directly invokes init scripts, should use
invoke-rc.d
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
850762: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850762
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bu
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #850762 {Done: Thorsten Alteholz } [setserial]
setserial: missing dependency on lsb-base
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longe
Control: reopen -1
Control: retitle -1 setserial: directly invokes init scripts, should use
invoke-rc.d
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:54:08PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2017-01-27 17:09, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > Hello Thorsten Alteholz, Andreas Beckmann.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 22
On 2017-01-27 17:09, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello Thorsten Alteholz, Andreas Beckmann.
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 03:50:31PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> [...]
>>* debian/control: add dependency to lsb-base (Closes: #850762)
> [...]
>
> This change is WRONG. You're now depending on
Hello Thorsten Alteholz, Andreas Beckmann.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 03:50:31PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
[...]
>* debian/control: add dependency to lsb-base (Closes: #850762)
[...]
This change is WRONG. You're now depending on something which you don't
actually need!
(I'm not sure what t
6 matches
Mail list logo
