Hi Ole,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:14:07PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> I have a fix for both, and after a final test build, I will upload.
Thanks a lot. BTW, I'm fine if you close / lower severity of #849177.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Control: tags 848112 pending
Hi all,
On 23.12.2016 10:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Ole, if you would please commit the patch you named in #848112 and
> upload the package to make sure it can migrate right in time and will
> enable other packages to migrate as well?
>
> HOWEVER, we have another pro
Processing control commands:
> tags 848112 pending
Bug #848112 [python-skimage] Python-skimage depends on unavailable package
python-dask
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #848112 to the same tags previously set
--
848112: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848112
Debian Bug T
Processing control commands:
> tags 848112 pending
Bug #848112 [python-skimage] Python-skimage depends on unavailable package
python-dask
Added tag(s) pending.
--
840589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840589
848112: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848112
Debi
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:04:22PM -0700, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> OK by me, too.
>
> On December 22, 2016 9:45:10 PM Yaroslav Halchenko
> wrote:
>
> >On December 22, 2016 4:52:41 PM EST, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >>place were people who intend to help can effectively join the effort.
> >
OK by me, too.
On December 22, 2016 9:45:10 PM Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
On December 22, 2016 4:52:41 PM EST, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi folks,
can we please, pretty please start acting now and move this package to
a
place were people who intend to help can effectively join the effort.
This
On December 22, 2016 4:52:41 PM EST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>can we please, pretty please start acting now and move this package to
>a
>place were people who intend to help can effectively join the effort.
>This package is blocking invesalius from migrating to testing and
>chances are l
Hi folks,
can we please, pretty please start acting now and move this package to a
place were people who intend to help can effectively join the effort.
This package is blocking invesalius from migrating to testing and
chances are low that it will reach stretch. So if the problem is to
pick a tea
On 14/12/16 19:58, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
I would have absolutely no problem moving skimage to team maintenance.
If Yarik agrees, I'd appreciate some pointers on how to move forward
with that. What I would like is to remain in the loop w.r.t. packaging
changes. python-dask should be package
I would have absolutely no problem moving skimage to team maintenance.
If Yarik agrees, I'd appreciate some pointers on how to move forward
with that. What I would like is to remain in the loop w.r.t. packaging
changes. python-dask should be packaged now, I think Diane Trout of one
of the teams
On 14/12/16 09:59, Ole Streicher wrote:
Since skimage is one of the central packages, I would again ask to put
it under science|python team maintenance. Especially when under some
time pressure (upcoming freeze, combined with autoremovals of packages)
it would help a lot if the problems could be
package: python-skimage
version: 0.12.3-2
severity: serious
The Python 2 version of skimage depends on a package "python-dask" that
is not available in Debian.
There is a patch that make the dependency optional; however the
dependency was not removed afterwards. For Python 3, this seems to work.
12 matches
Mail list logo
