On 5 December 2016 at 21:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Thomas--
>
> On Sat 2016-12-03 10:33:11 -0500, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>> I can reproduce this on sid. It appears that GnuPG has started
>> reporting incorrect error values. I have reported it here:
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 gnupg
Bug #846675 [src:zeroinstall-injector] zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS: Test
failures
Bug reassigned from package 'src:zeroinstall-injector' to 'gnupg'.
No longer marked as found in versions zeroinstall-injector/2.12-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
Control: reassign -1 gnupg
Control: forcemerge 846834 -1
Control: affects -1 src:zeroinstall-injector
Control: severity -1 serious
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:25:58PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Thomas--
>
> On Sat 2016-12-03 10:33:11 -0500, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> > I can reproduce thi
Hi Thomas--
On Sat 2016-12-03 10:33:11 -0500, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> I can reproduce this on sid. It appears that GnuPG has started
> reporting incorrect error values. I have reported it here:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846834
>
> If that doesn't get fixed soon, I cou
On 3 December 2016 at 07:44, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: zeroinstall-injector
> Version: 2.12-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161202 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid,
Source: zeroinstall-injector
Version: 2.12-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161202 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
